<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Vad&apos;s Best Ideas</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286</id>
   <updated>2008-01-27T14:17:11Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 1.53</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Apples and Oranges</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/apples_and_oranges_1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2451</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-27T03:45:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-27T14:17:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Millions saw the apple fall, and only Newton asked why.&quot; Bernard Baruch I remember taking a close look at AAPL back in October of 2007 as the stock was rapidly closing in on the magical $200 level... I liked the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="aapl" label="AAPL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="dell" label="DELL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="grmn" label="GRMN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="sne" label="SNE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="tivo" label="TIVO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Millions saw the apple fall, and only Newton asked why."<br />
Bernard Baruch</p>

<p>I remember <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/10/never_trouble_trouble_till_tro.php">taking a close look at AAPL back in October of 2007</a> as the stock was rapidly closing in on the magical $200 level... I liked the company products, business model, management and the only real negative noted was the hefty price... Here is a quote of my rationale from that post: "I think AAPL is a great company with unmatched products, shrewd management and loyal customers but, at the time of this writing at $171 a share, I personally do not believe that the risk/return tradeoff for this stock (not a company) is favorable. It is quite possible that given some luck and momentum, the market could carry AAPL another 5-10% higher, but at this price just as easily any negative news could easily lead to a gap down that could be quite severe"</p>

<p>Rereading my <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/10/never_trouble_trouble_till_tro.php">original thoughts on the subject</a> it is hard not to notice that my rationale turned out to be on target (I am considering that may be I should doing this for living some day soon) and even "the original target" market cap of $120B is awfully close to Friday's price of $114B. I am not sure whether it was simply a lucky call, brilliant insight :) or merely a coincidence, but there where quite a few occasions in the last several weeks when "driven by populist pressure" (yes I even received some "hate" emails from Mac lovers)  I considered jumping in and buying some shares on the way down. But every time I thought about finally pulling the trigger, my skeptical mind has intervened. And now here is the "why I didnt'" part...</p>

<p>First, I do think Steve Jobs is a genius. There are only few people in the technology world whose words arguably carry similar weight (Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, Larry Page and Sergey Brin) and he probably has no equals in his ability to market products. In addition- the ingenuity of AAPL's R&D team, the "simple and brilliant" design of AAPL's products still remains an envy of the entire IT world. The loyal customers of AAPL are willingly shelling out ever larger sums of cash for never slowing flurry of newer and better products. But this is precisely where AAPL got in trouble and why it is so vulnerable today...</p>

<p>AAPL simply defines what "consumer discretionary" term means. It is also quite clear, unfortunately, that timing for significant growth in consumer discretionary purchases is not that great. With US economy on the way to recession or may be even already there, there is simply not enough discretionary spending out there for all the new and improved iPods and iMacs. As the anemic 5% growth rate in number of iPods sold last quarter shows -not even AAPL's unmatched innovation could force the consumers to substitute their perfectly good iPods with iTouches...And when recession fears become an acknowledged reality - iMacs (which by the  way deliver most of the financial benefit) might just become another target for slowing growth. HP and Dell by the way have souped up the design of their products recently and can offer cash strapped consumers a healthy high double digit discount for the comparable performance vs Macs...</p>

<p>Things are a just a little brighter on the iPhone side... It is certainly true that buying an unlocked iPhone in most BRIC countries is not only a habit; it is rather a must for any "new middle class" wannabe. But AAPL's iPhone business model is quite heavily reliant on the commissions from the Mobile carriers which are not going to materialize when phones are not activated on the partner networks. It is widely acknowledged that almost 25% of the iPhones purchased, end up being unlocked on the other networks. In that case AAPL only earns one time cash payment albeit at a healthy margin. But absent major announcements from more carriers in Russia, Brazil and China, the iPhone current partners alone can't quite deliver the growth in earnings high enough to justify the still hefty multiple and still high growth expectations...</p>

<p>Here is another concern for shareholders- while AAPL is arguably more innovative than Microsoft it is certainly behaves as a less mature company, and I don't quite mean that in a "good" way.  I personally still can not quite comprehend why would a company with $18B (15% of the market cap) in cash on the balance sheet does not deploy it in a productive way. Steve Jobs needs to swallow his pride and do the right thing- buy back stock, pay a dividend or at the least make a smart acquisition... Hint, investing in clean energy at stupid multiples like Google is not a smart way to achieve dominance in the consumer device space, but may be buying something reasonably priced like GRMN or TIVO might just do the trick..</p>

<p>To sum it up, absent good news on the economic front and smart capital allocation announcements AAPL is at best a good "hold" here.</p>

<p>P.S. Here is a re priced high level "Vad's sum of the parts valuation" for AAPL:</p>

<p>"PC Unit- value no more than DELL= $45B; iPod/iTouch with iTunes- value no more than the entire Sony Corp=$47B; iPhone value no more than a 1/3 of RIMM based on the number of subscribers of 3M vs 11M growing at roughly the same unit value or roughly=$16B. So even this very rough but generous new total target price comes out to roughly $108B which is now a roughly 5-7% discount to today's price. </p>

<p>Stay safe and cheers,<br />
Vad <a href="http://www.skepticalcapitalist.com">www.skepticalcapitalist.com</a><br />
former "Dishwasher"<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Helicopter Ben...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/helicopter_ben.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2448</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-27T01:58:19Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-27T02:02:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Most of us can read the writing on the wall; we just assume it&apos;s addressed to someone else&quot; Ivern Ball It has been a only few days since the event that might go down in history as a day &quot;when...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Most of us can read the writing on the wall; we just assume it's addressed to someone else" <br />
Ivern Ball</p>

<p>It has been a only few days since the event that might go down in history as a day "when Federal Reserve has finally acknowledged the existence of the former "Greenspan or now Bernanke put". By cutting rates by 75BP Fed has in effect told the investing world- "we will do whatever it takes to prevent a severe decline in the financial markets..." Whether it was a wise move is still open for debate, but one thing is clear to me personally- nominal stock price levels will be defended at all costs even if it requires "inflating" away the "real" savings.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/fear_is_better_than_greed.php">I guess I was right to predict last Monday night</a>, that the group of Fed governors was quite "weak in the knees" and thus was very likely to intervene with some kind of remedy to prevent another decline in the stock indices. And sure enough just 12 hours after my post, they cut rates abruptly :) While one might say it was a lucky coincidence, I think it wasn't at all surprising. What's more, this move was very typical of what we came to expect from the US Fed over the last twenty years- in the battle of fear and greed- Fed will always err on the side of greed, because battling fear is easy and makes them look smart in the short term, while battling greed is something "that Federal Reserve can not control" and is almost certain to cause some serious political pressures...</p>

<p>I remember how the surprise rate from Bernanke in August has for a short while forced me to question my understanding and logic of how the financial markets function in general and what role should Fed's play in the economy... </p>

<p>But after reading Greenspan's book my original views of benefits of less frequent interventions from the Fed have been reinforced and now more than ever I believe that US Fed has a lot to learn from ECB's Trichet... As far as Greenspans's legacy goes, even today I still have a lot of respect for him personally as well as for his deep understanding of the world economy. It is also true, that his ultra low, arguably unreasonably so, interest rate levels helped to trigger the real estate bubble... But it will be Bernanke's hasty rate cuts that are likely to determine whether US will go through a short term, mild recession or rather something more significant, something we have not seen since early 80s- a period of potentially anemic growth and stubbornly high inflation...</p>

<p>It is popular to say now that if Greenspan was at the helm of Federal Reserve today he would have dealt with it similarly to how Bernanke is responding. But I am not so sure -if you read his book carefully, he states clearly that situation surrounding us today is quite different from anything he had to ever deal with. The disinflationary influence of Chinese, Indian and former Soviet labor force entering the world economy has now diminished.</p>

<p>What's more, with the continued rapid wage inflation in these countries and rapid appreciation of "real asset" prices, these economies are now likely to cause just the opposite effect- more inflation. As Milton Friedman famously said-"Inflation always and everywhere is purely a monetary phenomenon"... Thus while it is quite simple to blame high food and oil prices for the latest inflation spike, it is simply a side effect of excess liquidity. And thus injecting more money into the economy in the face of the highest inflation level in 17 years is almost a "guaranteed" recipe for another bubble somewhere and in something...</p>

<p>Hence there lies an underlying opportunity. Where will this excess liquidity show up? I am going to watch the developments closely and will deliver my thoughts as they come in... :) For now, with mortgage rates closing on 5% and a potential refinancing surge only two more 25BP cuts away, Ben and Co might just succeed in slowing the declines of housing prices and potentially even lead to a short term revival of the financial sector, but the truth of the matter is simple- even if the nominal value of your house goes up, the real "inflation adjusted" value is likely to continue sliding lower. However, I am currently in the process of studying several closed end mortgage ETFs that are selling below NAV. If someone has ideas please feel free to send them over to me at <a href="mailto:skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com">skepticalcapitalist@gmail.com</a></p>

<p>But anyway, once again- enough rambling- back to stock picking. The main purpose of this blog should be helping investors make money, not arguing about Fed's actions... So here is a quick recap of what I have done last week- I sold my ultra short ETFs on Tuesday and jumped onto the long side the next day... I have bought a number my  former "oversold" favorites- MGI, ETFC, GEOY, PTNR, CEL, HOLX, CTCM, RIG, CHNG. I still think that markets are likely to head lower in the next few months but with another potential rate cut in the works - this "dead cat bounce" rally might just keep us trading water in a narrow range of a 12000 +/- few hundred points for a short while... </p>

<p>I will do my final analysis and selection for the MSN contest this weekend, and will post my picks early next week But I still think that regardless of where the US markets head in the coming weeks- current prices for FXP (ultra short China) and EEV (ultra short emerging markets) now once again offer a good risk /reward trade off and represent a great hedge for almost any investor.</p>

<p>But as with any short positions- cap your losses to no more than 10% and take your gains on any double digit moves up :) You can't go broke taking profits :)</p>

<p>Stay safe,<br />
Vad<br />
<a href="http://www.skepticalcapitalist.com">www.skepticalcapitalist.com</a><br />
 <br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Fear is better than greed</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/fear_is_better_than_greed.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2392</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-22T04:48:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-22T04:52:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually fearing you will make one&quot; Elbert Hubbard Here it comes... Bloodshed and fear have finally visited the &quot;new leaders&quot; of the world economy. I guess it might be...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"The greatest mistake you can make in life is to be continually fearing you will make one" 							Elbert Hubbard</p>

<p>Here it comes... Bloodshed and fear have finally visited the "new leaders" of the world economy. I guess it might be the right time for me to claim <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/10/the_wordly_bubble_part_2.php">that I did get it right after all</a>, but on the other hand it is also unfortunate that many of the poor Chinese retail investors are learning in a very hard way that nothing ever goes up forever...</p>

<p>Greed can force people to do stupid things and the "this time will be different" speech is almost always a "sure thing" sell signal. But I wonder what will all the China bulls are going to say now? I guess we might just hear another reason why the Chinese stocks are so ridiculously cheap and why was PetroChina worth more than GE and Exxon combined... One thing is a fact -Hang Seng has declined an astounding 11% in only two days and no one can say for sure just how much lower it could go...</p>

<p>I have been a China "Bear" since late October of 2007 and have endured some serious pain from Ultra Short China ETF (FXP) being one of the only few significant decliners in my SLO-1 fund. My rationale for being short China has been very simple-it has simply gone too far too fast. Irrational behavior of Chinese corporations making almost a third of their profits from investments in other companies, astounding real estate price gains etc just simply could not continue forever...</p>

<p>The real question now is how fast the pain from the stock market decline in the emerging economies would transfer to the hard issues like real estate bubbles, manufacturing overcapacity, rampant inflation and lack of sound market principle based economic foundation. I think that China is positioned somewhat better than Japan was during the last "New Deal" bubble due to the huge $1T "foreign-exchange" reserve that could be used to shore up the onslaught of "bad loans"; but driven by the recent "irrational exuberance" attached to anything with the name China in it, by the time its over -the US sub prime fiasco might just look like a joke...</p>

<p>The latest question of the week asked what an average investor should do when markets decline as severely as they have in the last several weeks- my answer to this question is simple- when fear takes such a firm control of the market- the safest bets are shorting and protecting principal by investing into agency bonds... As I mentioned during the last few weeks - ultra short ETFs like FXP, EEV and TWM as well as some bond fund ETFs (TLT,TIP, SHY) could just do the trick...</p>

<p>P.S. I am willing to bet that after looking at the Asian market declines Bernanke and Co are probably now meeting in the "war room" and trying to arrange some kind of remedy before the market opens tomorrow... Otherwise we might just see another "Black Tuesday" decline that could make some kind of history :)</p>

<p>Stay safe and short :)<br />
SkepticalCapitalist.com<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The world is round...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/the_world_is_round_1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2385</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-20T16:27:25Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-24T23:56:49Z</updated>
   
   <summary> &quot;The world is round and the place which may seem like the end may also be only the beginning&quot; Ivy Baker Priest It seems like we finally starting to see a healthy amount of fear in the market place...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="bbb" label="BBB" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p> "The world is round and the place which may seem like the end may also be only the beginning"<br />
Ivy Baker Priest</p>

<p>It seems like we finally starting to see a healthy amount of fear in the market place and in my book it is a good sign... Dow has dropped almost all the way to the last year's low which means the "funny" gains of 2007 have been finally erased. My guess is that during the next several months there will be numerous opportunities for the long term investors to make some terrific investors. But until everyone believes that the recession is inevitable and real, markets might just continue to find another reason to sell off every week... So with the goal of principal preservation as the main goal in the short term, the question now is simply how to avoid severe losses during the next few months.</p>

<p>Here are some quick thoughts to consider before jumping in too heavily into some of the sectors that are widely being touted as extremely cheap by "historical measures":</p>

<p>-	Yes, write downs in the financial sector might seem quite severe, may be even unreasonable, but given that most ABX indexes just hit the new lows last week- expect more bad news from financials. We still haven't heard from many insurers and other firms that make their living predominately by making investments into various securities. Some states and municipalities will be forced to cut costs hence more layoffs are very likely. Asset managers held up better than most other financial stocks but with markets down in double digits since October- expect similar declines in asset driven fees and even more severe declines in performance incentive fees. Hence more lay offs again...</p>

<p>Below is an example of a BBB rated ABX Index- we are talking 13 cents on the dollar here...</p>

<p><img alt="ABX%20BBB.png" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/ABX%20BBB.png" width="500" height="360" /></p>

<p>Source: http://www.markit.com/information/products/abx.html</p>

<p>-	Decoupling of the emerging markets from the US economy seems to be a very popular theme with many people believing that even when recession in US becomes obvious emerging markets will behave differently than they have in the past. But I think one needs to look behind the hyped up stories of the booming stock markets and skyrocketing real estate prices- the truth is- boom of the emerging economies has been driven predominately by growing exports to the outside world and not their own consumers. </p>

<p>-	<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120053579654996387.html">Consider this simple fact reported in WSJ last week:</a> "...In Asia, for example, exports hit 55% of the total economic output in 2005, according to the Asian Development bank, compared with 45% output in 2002. While intra-Asian trade has grown, about 60% of Asian exports are eventually consumed in the US, Europe and Japan."<br />
So, with Japan's economy on the brink of another collapse, US economy either in recession already or almost there, and finally with European economic growth showing fresh signs of strain almost daily now, how could the emerging economies possibly hold up?</p>

<p>More to come in the next few days,<br />
Vad</p>

<p>P.S. One more little note - For all those who actually believe Chairman Bernanke, who keeps reiterating that the US Economy will somehow avoid recession. Everyone is confident that Fed actually knows something we don't. Yes, I am pretty sure with thousands of staffers on the payroll that could be the case, but consider another fact- Fed's statements about what they think the economy is going to do are not designed to be realistic. They simply can't be too pessimistic, period! Fed's job description assumes guiding the economy out of the recessions and thus any express statements supporting the view that US economy is heading into there would make it a certainty that will end up there even quicker- so my advice ignore Fed's projections and statements and look purely at actions. Cutting rates by 100BP with inflation at 17 year high is not designed to simply "provide insurance" against slowdowns...<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Part 2</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/part_2_1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2348</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-16T03:35:14Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-16T03:54:13Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Continued from &quot;Are we there yet?&quot; What came yesterday was a real shocker- not only the losses were significantly larger than expected $800M as of November 30th (could exceed $1.5B by the end of January) but the liquidity crunch got...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Continued from <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/are_we_there_yet.php">"Are we there yet?"</a></p>

<p>What came yesterday was a real shocker- not only the losses were significantly larger than expected $800M as of November 30th (could exceed $1.5B by the end of January) but the liquidity crunch got so bad that MGI had to renegotiate the debt that was put in place just a few months ago to pretty much junk rates and had to also sell over a $1.3B in securities in a "fire sale" with real losses now hitting the book and cash balances...And in addition all the equity is going to be raised at prices significantly lower than current trading price...</p>

<p>At the end MGI might have to give up and astounding 60-70%+ of the total equity to new investor just to stay alive...Case closed?</p>

<p>But what seems to be really bad, is that contrary to the common logic- it does not seem like the supposedly safer vintages are really any safer, or that the problem is only related to the residential real estate related securities, or that it is easy or even at all possible to raise relatively safe debt now, even if it is backed by an asset that consistently cash flows $200M and is growing at 20% a year...And we are talking about leverage of only 3-4 times that projected earnings stream...A year ago multiples like this were assumed to be conservative- bad news for any outstanding private equity deals out there as well as for any boought firms that did not raise debt using "covenant lite" loans...</p>

<p>Yes, it is possible that the lack of the initial disclosure of the details on the entire portfolio and the lack of response to the Euronet's offer have triggered the ensuing fiasco. And I do think that multiple lawsuits will follow within days and that CEO's days are numbered, but it won't really help the investors who have lost a fortune...Even I personally have lost some money after initially having large gains on this company in 2007.</p>

<p>I am also afraid that MoneyGram story could turn out to be a really ugly indication of things to come... Just how bad it could really get in the next few weeks is still open for discussions, but while <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/in_nature_there_are_neither.php">my forecast for 2008</a> assumed a world wide market downturn- I now think the situation might be even worse than one could have imagined...We clearly still have some severe froth in several emerging markets (main one is China). And it is still safe to assume that any stock that has a high leverage and even, God forbid, has a lot of asset based securities on the balance sheet (think banks and investment banks) could be in for a rough ride in the months to come. Stay away from financials- even though some regional banks seem like a good deal on the surface- after the MGI's fiasco- I don't think it is really possible to reliably value any complex asset backed product right now...</p>

<p>And finally let's not forget- while I believe that we have already entered or might be in the process of entering a full blown recession- not everyone is pricing in the same outcome quite yet. Only when majority of market participants agree that we are going into the "R" word- the risk/return trade off of owing stocks might finally tilt into investor's favor. For now- bonds, or bond ETFs (TLT, TIP, SHY etc), short selling individual stocks and some of the safer not leveraged non cyclical and non consumer discretionary long positions could possibly offer some safety in the weeks to come...</p>

<p>Trade safe and cheers, <br />
Vad (former "Dishwasher" now simply a "Skeptical Economist")</p>

<p>P.S. I am in the process of setting up my new blog and getting ready for the MSN contest which turns out requires a lot of writing even prior to start which means I'll probably less attention to the virtual portfolios for the next few weeks. But I'll keep posting regularly here and will share my views on any of the fun developments in the next few weeks.</p>

<p>P.S.S. Also don't forget to use trailing stop losses on any long positions- it always better to be safe than sorry... By the way, sell offs also mean better upside once market stabilizes so don't panic or worry - protect whatever gains you might have and have enough in liquid securities to jump in the high beta stocks once the right time comes.<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Are we there yet?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/are_we_there_yet.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2347</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-16T03:32:14Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-16T03:45:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;If a fellow isn&apos;t thankful for what he&apos;s got, he isn&apos;t likely to be thankful for what he&apos;s going to get.&quot; Frank A. Clark What a disastrous month has it been so far for investors...One sector after another seem to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"If a fellow isn't thankful for what he's got, he isn't likely to be thankful for what he's going to get."<br />
Frank A. Clark</p>

<p>What a disastrous month has it been so far for investors...One sector after another seem to be collapsing one day, recovering a bit the next day only to set a new low a day later. And I wish there were good news on the horizon...So far I don't see many. </p>

<p>Today's MoneyGram collapse was significant for many reasons. The scary part about the whole story is that it shows just how bad the things could get even for a company with a fundamentally great business when financial system does not function properly. I think this company offers a great look behind the current market situation...</p>

<p>Let's begin with a simple fact- according to the company's release yesterday- the underlying fundamental business of transferring money around the world can't really get much better. Revenue growth for the latest quarter was roughly 25% and agent growth about 30%. So with roughly $150M in earnings and the solidly double digit growth rate the core business alone should be worth about $3-$3.5B.</p>

<p>So far so good- so how did it get so ugly? The whole mess came from a relatively tiny business of processing official checks and money orders. The business model is quite simple - hold the funds for a few days and earn the float income why they are in process. Ok, so you might ask where is the catch and how did could the situation get so bad so quickly? Quite simple- the only way to really grow this segment for MGI was to increase the net investment margin, so that's exactly what they have done- tied the compensation of the Treasurer to the net interest spread??? Hello?? Could we get a lawyer in here? Lesson number one -people respond to incentives- they always do what's gives them a higher paycheck especially if it mean taking a lot of risk with not their own money and that's the end of story...</p>

<p>Ok, let's now shift to the second part- how could so many sophisticated investors like Blum and Co, Fidelity and many well known value hedge funds get into the red so deeply, even while knowing what was going on in the credit markets. This is were the story gets a bit murky and starts to smell like a clear lawsuit - short introduction- as of the end of the third quarter MGI held roughly $5.3B in asset backed securities out of which they classified only $1.5B as having real exposure to the lock down in the residential debt market.</p>

<p>MGI wrote down almost $300M in Q3 but never really sold any securities because according to the management the cash flows didn't really confirm the market's fears. So the rest of the portfolio was widely assumed to be relatively safe, because it wasn't tied to the residential market and also was of more conservative (as assumed by most) 2004-2005 vintages. </p>

<p>So here how the common logic worked- if one assumed that eTrade's debt sale of 27 cents on the dollar represented a theoretical floor on the valuations of most debt securities, one could have also reasonably expected that as much as 70% of the "riskier" MGI securities could be written off with $700M in paper write downs scheduled for Q4. Yes, the requirement to have a positive net worth was a well known risk, but with $400M in book value and freshly raised $150M of debt, the assumed equity need of $300-400M didn't really change the picture that much assuming they raised it at a slight discount to the trading price.</p>

<p>So all-in-all value investors like myself have calculated that even with potential $1B in total loses there was still significant upside left in the deal. Rough calculations goes like this- $3B payment transfer business valuation (lower end of the initial range because of the additional interest on the debt) minus $1B ($700M) after tax losses with debt in the sub $750M and some potential slight equity dilution, $20 a share target price did not seem unreasonable vs $13-14 a share price then trading price...</p>

<p>Continued in Part 2</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Will market ever be efficient?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/will_market_ever_be_efficient_1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2298</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-09T04:17:56Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-09T04:22:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Confidence is preparation. Everything else is beyond your control&quot; Richard Kline It is simply amazing to observe how fast human emotions could swing from one direction to another. Several months ago with markets at record high - every &quot;talking head&quot;...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Confidence is preparation.  Everything else is beyond your control" <br />
Richard Kline</p>

<p>It is simply amazing to observe how fast human emotions could swing from one direction to another. Several months ago with markets at record high - every "talking head" on TV has been screaming "Buy", analysts predicted that Fed has saved the day with prompt and aggressive rate cuts and even Fed governors themselves projected a significant economic turnaround early in 2008. Now the rhetoric has seem to have changed dramatically- the "R" word is all over the Media, Fed bashing is taking a different turn- not enough cutting instead of too much, and Philadelphia Fed's speech today has shifted the economic growth further into 2008... Markets are pricing in rate cuts as far the eye can see, but people still believe that most emerging markets will still somehow avoid the slowdown? I mean, come one- with almost a third of Chinese large company earnings coming from investment gains in other companies how could this "hyper" growth continue???</p>

<p>The more I observe the irrationality of human actions, the more confident I become that markets can not be efficient by definition. We- humans are way too emotional, and even the extreme computerization of trading that has occurred during the last few years has done little to correct the inefficiencies, and may even reinforced them as with so many people using Technical Analysis as a primary tool stocks swing even further in each direction...</p>

<p>The only good thing about this for us-regular investors is that these inefficiencies represent real opportunity to benefit in the long haul. It further confirms that most of the "investment related screaming" on TV, radio and in the news is simply "noise" that should be ignored. Data driven logic is the only thing that matters... </p>

<p>It seems like <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/do_what_you_can_with_what_you.php">some of my prediction for 2008</a> are coming together a bit faster than expected, so now back to the portfolio review part- after presenting <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/recession_is_real_and_is_just_1.php">my arguments why I believe that the recession is just around the corner</a>, I've repositioned my portfolio to what I think the appropriate stance at this time should be- capital preservation mode.</p>

<p>10% in ultra short ETFs- TWM and FXP, 15% in bond ETFs (TLT, TIP and SHY) with the remainder split up between the "key theme" 2008 sectors- Tech, Utilities, Telecom, Healthcare and "inflation hedge" sectors - O&G and Materials. However, my contrarian play - MGI has cost me quite a bit of money so far and thus mitigated some of the positives from the short hedges. I have sold some shares yesterday on strength and will buy more on weakness in the next several days, but the bad news is that from what I am hearing and seeing, financing buyouts that do not have a large tangible asset base behind them is quite difficult right now so if EEFT pulls their offer of the table- the sell off might continue, so I have so far refrained from doubling down more, but it is not out of the question in the next few sessions...</p>

<p>And finally -the important part from <a href="http://www.philadelphiafed.org/publicaffairs/speeches/plosser/2008/01-08-08_main-line-chamber-commerce.cfm">today's Plosser speech</a>- "I am concerned that developments on the inflation front will make the Fed's policy decisions more difficult in 2008. Recent data suggest that inflation is becoming more broad-based. Recent increases do not appear to be solely related to the rise in energy prices. Consequently I see more worrisome signs of underlying price pressures. Although I am expecting slow economic growth for several quarters, we should not rely on slow growth to reduce inflation. Indeed, the 1970s should be a sufficient reminder that slow growth and falling inflation do not necessarily go hand in hand. Moreover, the 1990s should remind us that we can have sustained economic growth without generating inflation.</p>

<p>Although inflationary expectations have crept up only slightly since early September based on inflation-indexed Treasury securities, my sense is that these inflation expectations are more fragile now than they were six months ago. If inflation expectations continue to rise, it will be difficult and costly to the economy to deliver on our goal of price stability and puts at risk the Fed's credibility for maintaining low and stable inflation."</p>

<p>Simply "wow"- it seems that at least of the Fed governors have finally started to pay attention to what really matters- price stability. The real question for the markets now is- what if the 50BP cut does not materialize? How much lower would the markets go? I would be hesitant to jump in into the high Beta game until we at least completely erase the gains from 2007...</p>

<p>Anyway, stay safe and cheers<br />
Vad</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Recession is real and is just around the corner- true or false?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/recession_is_real_and_is_just_1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2266</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-05T04:18:43Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-05T05:24:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Having a little inflation is like being a little pregnant.&quot; Leon Henderson My point on this subject as been relatively consistent so of instead another lengthy blog, just a few quick graphs for the few remaining &quot;bulls&quot; - little commentary...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Having a little inflation is like being a little pregnant." <br />
  Leon Henderson</p>

<p>My point on this subject as been relatively consistent so of instead another lengthy blog, just a few quick graphs for the few remaining "bulls" - little commentary needed...</p>

<p><strong>If history is of any value- housing starts have more room to go down</strong></p>

<p><img alt="housing%20starts_mod.GIF" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/housing%20starts_mod.GIF" width="373" height="280" /></p>

<p>Source: U.S. Census Bureau, drawing by VY</p>

<p><strong>Payroll figures suggest we might be quite a bit closer to a recession than many think-may be just a few months away...</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Payroll%20figures_mod.GIF" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/Payroll%20figures_mod.GIF" width="373" height="280" /></p>

<p>Source: BLS, drawing by VY</p>

<p><strong>Unemployment rate trends seem to pointing the same thing- we are almost there</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Unemployment%20rate_mod.GIF" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/Unemployment%20rate_mod.GIF" width="373" height="280" /></p>

<p>Source: BLS, drawing by VY</p>

<p><strong>So what is the solution the Wall Street is "praying for" - rate cut? what a surprise- <strong>50BP </strong>more in January?</strong></p>

<p><img alt="January%202008.gif" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/January%202008.gif" width="373" height="280" /></p>

<p>Source: http://www.clevelandfed.org</p>

<p><strong>Hmm, I wonder if these economic "professionals" are missing something important again...</strong></p>

<p><img alt="Inflation_mod.GIF" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/Inflation_mod.GIF" width="373" height="280" /></p>

<p>Source: BLS, drawing by VY</p>

<p><strong>The punch line- here is my message to the Fed- yes it is always a tough trade off between resisting the pressures to cut rates and making sure inflation stays under control. Unemployment rate is easily politicized by making it personal ("Joneses lost their jobs and their house because of the evil corporations and incompetent president etc...").</p>

<p>Inflation harm on the other hand, while definitely more severe, is also long term and thus is more difficult to blame on politicians in office today...So my advice to individual investors simple- don't trust the politicians- keep it safe, look for shorts to protect the downside, on the long side- hide in the higher yielding lower beta stocks like utilities. Here is a short list of quant selected few that you might use a basic list (MGEE, PNM, TEG, CNP, PCG, POM, POR, CNL, OKE, CPL, OKE, CPL, CHG, EDE, NWEC, FE, UIL, ENI, PEG)</p>

<p>Cheers,<br />
Vad</strong></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>A fresh start to a New Year</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2008/01/a_fresh_start_to_a_new_year_1.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2008:/users/dishwasher//286.2254</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-04T04:04:13Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-04T04:12:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;If you don&apos;t like something- change it; if you can&apos;t change it, change the way you think about it&quot; Mary Engelbreit To be honest, it is still hard for me to believe that oil is trading at $100 a barrel......</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"If you don't like something- change it; if you can't change it, change the way you think about it"<br />
							Mary Engelbreit</p>

<p>To be honest, it is still hard for me to believe that oil is trading at $100 a barrel... Yes, I am one of those non believers who never thought that there was (or is) a true fundamental reason for oil to trade this high. Yes, I did read quite a few of the "super cycle" stories, "doom and gloom" peak theories, "red hot" Chimea (China, India, Middle East and Africa) demand growth projections etc but none of them can really offer legitimate support for the $100 per barrel price. $40,$50 may be even $60 a barrel could probably be rationally explained, but not a $100...</p>

<p><a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/part_2.php">In my market projection for 2008 </a> I said that oil and commodities is likely to decline in 2008 and while I am still sticking to my rationale, the long expected jump to a $100 level certainly deserves attention. I don't argue with the Market, if I can't explain why most of my quant screeners point to O&G servicing stocks as undervalued, I'll buy them. And while my "gut reaction" is to question the validity of the O&G projections I wonder if there is a simpler non fundamental explanation of high oil prices?</p>

<p> What if oil is simply another "bubble in the making" driven by lax monetary policy and another "flight to safety" by investors fleeing yet another investment that just a few years ago has seemed so safe and bullet proof -the real estate market? It seems like we have seen all of this before. The burst of the technology bubble in 2000-2001 has shaken up the investors' belief that stocks always gone up. Many of them stopped investing altogether and simply moved their savings into the mentally safest asset out there- their own house. As Fed's rate cuts led mortgage rates to the historic lows and real estate values skyrocketed, the newly rediscovered feeling of self confidence and media induced success stories has introduced yet another group of busted "dot-com like" real estate millionaires...</p>

<p>I don't have to say much about the outcome. While we the final numbers aren't out yet, one thing is for certain- by the time this "bust cycle" is over, United States is likely to go through another painful recession, trillions of dollars in "paper" net worth will evaporate and the "usual" Fed remedy of never ending rate cuts is virtually guaranteed to create yet another "sure thing" investment opportunity. So, given all the media attention and enormous and unsustainable money inflows, I think that oil and other commodities is now the best place to look for signs of this "next sure thing" boom/bust cycle...And, while on one hand the supply/demand fundamentals can not fully support the current run up in price of oil and other commodities, the behavioral/psychological/monetary side seems to be able to offer an explanation.</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119930154139162791.html"> According to an article in WSJ today</a>, "the number of oil-future bets on Nymex has quintupled since 2001. Because the oil has been rising at the same time, the dollars at stake in the main oil-futures benchmark, not including options, rose from $7B to more than $145B". In addition, the issue of the "true moral hazard" (<a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/toma47/2007/12/the_true_moral_hazard.php">Tom Armistead has commented on it one of his posts</a>), probably helped to exaggerate the move - outstanding oil futures contracts do not require an actual delivery and thus represent just another form of "phantom electronic paper" gambling.</p>

<p>In addition as Fed reduces interest rates (pumps in the additional liquidity), the "newly created" money supply by definition has to end up somewhere. So it moves into the assets that performed best recently - oil, gas and other commodities, agricultural and alternative energy stocks, emerging markets etc...How long could this continue? I don't know yet, but with most stocks trading flat to down recently, residential real estate not performing well and emerging markets starting to turn south, "hot" money will keep looking for the returns. </p>

<p>And today only base commodities, agriculture and alternative energy related investments seem to deliver what these momentum investors are looking for. The party has to stop some day but until there is an alternative for all of that liquidity to flush out, we might be looking at more of the same...</p>

<p>So, going back to the usual staff- I reshuffled my fund a bit recently and will keep posting here at SLO regularly just as I did for the last five months. I hope many of you will stick around for the SLO-2, I am sure it will be just as much fun or may be even more <br />
P.S. Short list of trades during the first two trading days- bought SIL, CDE, UFPT, TWM, FXP, more GEOY, CEL and more MGI today...Sold TSRA, GRMN, AYE, NNDS and KBALB. Still like them all but looking for a bit more unique Alpha opportunities and downside protection...</p>

<p>Trade safe and cheers,<br />
Vad </p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Farewell to SLO Season One</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/farewell_to_slo_season_one.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2007:/users/dishwasher//286.2222</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-29T02:14:46Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-29T02:21:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated&quot; Confucius I wasn&apos;t really going to write any final messages here but given that I spent the last five months sharing my thoughts and experiences, I thought that it...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated"<br />
Confucius</p>

<p>I wasn't really going to write any final messages here but given that I spent the last five months sharing my thoughts and experiences, I thought that it would be unfair not to do so during the last day of this contest.</p>

<p>First, I wanted to repeat that I am very happy with how well my portfolio performed, and how enjoyable the whole experience has been for me so far. Secondly, I wanted to quickly eliminate the confusion that might have arisen when some of the frequent visitors (Don Ferk :)) quickly glanced at the Top 5 leaderboard from yesterday, and did not find Dishwasher's name on it- it is purely a one day glitch :). ARRS/CCBL merger corporate action has not been adjusted yet and thus my portfolio is missing roughly $110k in gains which would put me right back in the number 3 spot for yesterday :)</p>

<p>I can't stress enough the fact, that I feel to have been very fortunate to be able to share my investing knowledge and ideas here at SLO during the last 5 months. And given all the positive feedback that I received from many of you, hopefully I've done it well. As a quick glance at the Top 50 blog posts of the contest indicates, I tried to put a lot of time, energy, thought and effort into all of my posts and have been rewarded with your votes.</p>

<p>In addition to blogging successes- my fund is also the only fund in the SLO that has been in the Top 5 almost during the entire contest. It is also interesting to note, that even if I did not make any trades after the first day and simply held my initial positions all the way to the end, my fund would have returned over 16.4%, which would have likely put my portfolio all the way into the Top 10-12 compliant funds of the entire contest. That proves that it is not only my good stock picking or trading skills, but rather my whole fundamental investment strategy is what allows even my pure "buy and hold" selection to deliver superior returns.</p>

<p>To sum it up, I truly believe that I have proved my ability to deliver great returns, write well, use a consistent investment strategy, and that I do deserve to win. But while I believe that my case is very compelling, it will certainly be up to the judges to decide who would be given this unique opportunity to be featured on the MSN's Strategy Lab panel in February.</p>

<p>Once again, I enjoyed competing against all of you a great deal, and to finish off here is the repeat of two paragraphs from one of my previous posts that sums my attitude for the entire SLO contest:</p>

<p>"My personal thanks goes to many of you whose posts I enjoyed reading- the "Wildman of SLO"- Don Ferk, the "Sub Prime" king- Andrew Carlson, the "Shorting Maniac"- Jon Coyle, the "IT Slave Driver" Keith Barton, the "Mac Guy" Jeff Kalnitz, the "Trustee" Eileen Teska, the "TA Guru" Kevin Wilde, the "Man of Few Words" Kai Pettanen, the "Always Drunk Realtor" Duffbeer, the "Sailor Mate" Magickniner, the "Cut to the Chase and drop your BS" Gullapali and the "Man of convictions"- Tom Armistead and many others...<br />
Many of you are not in the Top 10 today but as I said before- the cycle right now might not favor your style- but it does not mean that you do not deserve to be a finalist as far as I am concerned. I don't know if Ken, Mark and Co agree but who knows- this is not supposed to be a shoot for the "stars" (or should I say "Sun" :) ) contest so you never know how it will end up :) "</p>

<p>Please stay safe, have many cheers and a Happy New Year, <br />
Vad</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>&quot;If opportunity doesn&apos;t knock, build a door&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/if_opportunity_doesnt_knock_bu.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2007:/users/dishwasher//286.2207</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-28T02:54:29Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-28T03:12:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;Ideas are the beginning points of all fortunes&quot; Napoleon Hill I am sure many of you have seen and heard of all kinds of opinions and investing ideas for 2008. So here is one more- a list of Vad&apos;s quant...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"Ideas are the beginning points of all fortunes"<br />
Napoleon Hill</p>

<p>I am sure many of you have seen and heard of all kinds of opinions and investing ideas for 2008. So here is one more- a list of Vad's quant selected stocks to buy long and sell short in Q1 2008. Don't consider this a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks but rather a pool of ideas to explore and decide on using your own gray substance. </p>

<p>The interesting thing to me after I did my study this weekend is the number of Oil & Gas servicing stocks that showed up... There are two possible explanations- current growth expectations are too high or these stocks are dirt cheap. I am not going to question the results quite yet and thus I picked some well known names early this week.</p>

<p>Bull ideas- diversified pool:</p>

<p>ORCL, RIG, SYK, NYX, GENZ, FCX, WFR, DO, PCP, NOV, APOL, GRMN, BCR, ESV, HCBK, WAT, ANF, NVDA, DLB, CTCM, APH, NNDS, CLB, HOLX, TDG, TSRA, PDX, ANSS, UEPS, FMR, NDAQ</p>

<p>Don't forget to complement any the above stocks with a good number of additional "Alpha" ideas as this list is a bit skimpy on flashier and riskier names required to deliver consistent 25%+ annual returns. Even though my Marketocracy portfolio created using derivatives of this approach has so far delivered returns double that of the S&P with less risk as measured by Beta...</p>

<p>Bear ideas- promptly cut losses at 10% and reinvest in winners:</p>

<p>ZQK, VICR, SWWC, CTDC, FSS, COT, GVHR, MNC, QUIX, THC, LNG, GY, COHU,ROCK, CYBX, SHFL, CVTX, MCO, WNC, FLE, PLX, XL, RSC, KBH, NCC, CHP, TIV, RZ</p>

<p>Trade safe and cheers, <br />
Vad</p>

<p>P.S. Strange sell off in GEOY today. I picked up a bunch of shares late today in my personal account and think that it might be a welcome entry point for long term investors...<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Prudent Investing as I see it Part 2</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/prudent_investing_as_i_see_it.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2007:/users/dishwasher//286.2190</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-26T22:44:50Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-26T22:56:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>&quot;October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February&quot; Mark Twain As promised before I am going to continue to explain...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p><strong>"October:  This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks.  The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February"</strong>    <strong>Mark Twain</strong></p>

<p>As promised before I am going to continue to explain fundamentals of my regular investment strategy that I try to use in my other longer term funds at Marketocracy and personally. <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/_when_somebody_buys_a.php">link to Part 1 for anyone interested</a> <br />
I am also going to do that in the same way I would, if I was having a conversation with prospective investors trying to decide whether they are going to entrust me with their hard earned capital...</p>

<p>Implementing a successful investment strategy requires more then just good stock picking. I personally divide my money management process into three core parts:</p>

<p>1.	Portfolio management<br />
2.	Stock selection<br />
3.	Trade Execution and Risk Management</p>

<p>I have already started covering my stock selection portion in some of the previous posts but today I want to cover the first fundamental part- portfolio management.</p>

<p>Here is how "the long side" of my "guideline" hedge fund should look like:</p>

<p>50% of the fund would be devoted to a core group of roughly 10 stocks with initial weighting of about 5% each. This group would be selected utilizing a group of core quant factors with main emphasis on cash flow and growth. I would only overrule this fundamental methodology if the "quant group" becomes too heavily weighted in one sector. To me the threshold for concentration is 35%. This group would be rebalanced quarterly. </p>

<p>30-35% of the fund would be devoted to "micro trends and event" picks. Basically a group of 5-6 stocks that I believe would benefit from the specific short term events or trends that I identified using on my "big picture" view of the economy in general. These stocks are likely to be turned over more quickly than the rest of the portfolio.</p>

<p>15-20% of the fund would be devoted to a "conviction contrarian" bet. This contrarian bet in addition to having a compelling story behind it, has to also make it on the least of most active highest % losers of the day on the NYSE or Nasdaq at least once, preferably several times in a short period of time. As I mentioned before - I believe that fear triggers overreaction which in turn presents a rare opportunity to make a quick double digit return on the bounce. This contrarian bet is also subject to a very quick exit once it makes a heavy volume double digit move up. In addition, the initial position in this contrarian bet is likely to be of similar size with the "event" picks or roughly 7% or so. Picking an absolute bottom is quite difficult and thus the position is expected to grow to the target 15-20% through averaging down. I usually set exit limits below my first entry price, even though most of these beaten down stocks gap up routinely.</p>

<p>To sum it up - my fund should be expected on average to consist of roughly 16-17 long positions with only one position larger than 10%. All losers with an exception of the "contrarian bet" will be eliminated mercilessly upon breaching a 7-10% loss (depending on stock's volatility) level even if that means higher turnover.</p>

<p>On the "short side"- maximum initial position is 40% of "the long side". Smaller average positions of roughly 2% each should be expected. No upper sector concentration limit, losers are mercilessly cut with maximum 10% downside. Picks will be predominately quant based on a multi-factor model with high leverage, negative cash flows and high short as a percent of float as significant drivers. I will add to the winning positions at the expense of losing but not to exceed the double of the initial position.</p>

<p>My fund should be expected to invest (both long and short) in domestic, foreign equities and any US traded ETFs. Tax considerations while important for the individual investors will not significantly influence my investment management process. I am running my portfolio with the goal of delivering above average positive returns and thus short term capital gains are to be expected.</p>

<p>To sum up the principles of my portfolio management strategy- 1.4 to 1 expected total leverage, 16-17 long positions, 15-20 short positions, no single stock over 25% of the portfolio, losses cut at 7-10% depending on individual volatility, significant short term capital gains and higher than average turnover are to be expected.</p>

<p>To be continued with more on individual stock selection...</p>

<p>Trade safe and cheers,<br />
Vad<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>&quot;Investors have very short memories&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/investors_have_very_short_memo.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2007:/users/dishwasher//286.2189</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-26T22:32:18Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-26T22:40:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I can&apos;t stop getting confused and amazed with just how silly some stocks/investors can behave in the short term. As I said in my previous posts I fully believe that stocks while semi efficient in general, tend to overshoot in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I can't stop getting confused and amazed with just how silly some stocks/investors can behave in the short term. As I said in my previous posts I fully believe that stocks while semi efficient in general, tend to overshoot in each direction when some stock or sector all of sudden gets "hot" or "cold"... Today's "craze du jour" is definitely the alternative energy field. Undoubtedly, solar is a great alternative to ethanol and many established solar companies are likely be successful in the long term. But do all the companies in the sector deserve the same fantasy valuations? I don't think so...</p>

<p>Look at the CTDC - up 70% today alone... <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ctdc">http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ctdc</a> The company has been around since the late 90s, never made any real money but recently has announced that it intends to be a "solar focused" company. Because it has bought a factory making thin film base plate and announced an agreement with a subsidiary of a bulletin board company called China Solar. Stock price of which in turn started going up after changing it's name from Deli Solar to China Solar and issuing more shares :)... Heh?  It is simply very humorous how far the excesses could go in the short term...Stocks like this are simply going to end up costing retail investors a lot of heart burn and money...</p>

<p>Here is Vad's take- most of the solar stocks flying hot today are likely to trade much lower in the next 12-18 months- some will even go out of business. Let's be realistic- it's going to be (or actually as LDK's results show) already is a pure "commodity" business. What does it mean- it means competing predominately based on price, hence lower margins and ultimately lower multiples. Yes, there are several players that actually do make money and could probably deliver solid double digit growth for years to come. But current overinvestment and hype in this solar business is simply not sustainable... Manufacturing stocks (yes solar stocks are simply manufactures albeit having a very high growth rate) trade at lower multiples for a reason-they require heavy capex to support growth and are subject to constant pressures from commodity prices, suppliers and customers. </p>

<p>Anyway, just usual ramblings here but I really do wish we could short stocks at this contest as well...</p>

<p>Disclosure- this post is not directed at any person or stock (except CTDC) specifically. I simply wanted to state my opinion and put out a red warning sign out there- "Solar overheating"</p>

<p>Trade safe and cheers,<br />
Vad</p>

<p>P.S. Here is a short term recipe for instant success for any high risk entrepreneurs out there- just open a plant in China (it could be actually even faster to buy one using investor's money :)), list on NASDAQ or may be even better in Hong Kong, call yourself something that has the word "solar" and may be even "fun" or "china" in it and go surfing on the Costa Rica :). Just hope you can get it done before the reversal unravels full speed...<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>&quot;Do what you can, with what you have, where you are&quot; T.Roosevelt</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/do_what_you_can_with_what_you.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2007:/users/dishwasher//286.2159</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-21T20:47:16Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-28T16:14:44Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We now only have one week left until this first SLO contest is finished and I thought that now might be a great time to look back at the events of the last five months. My portfolio has been fluctuating...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="aapl" label="AAPL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="bidu" label="BIDU" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="grmn" label="GRMN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>We now only have one week left until this first SLO contest is finished and I thought that now might be a great time to look back at the events of the last five months. My portfolio has been fluctuating around the 30-40% return range for a most of the last two months and absent any major events during the next three trading days I should finish the year in the Top 5... All-in-all I am extremely happy with how well my portfolio performed as well as how enjoyable the whole experience has been for me so far. I look forward to continuing with my blogging and stock picking in 2008 :)</p>

<p>Anyway, I spent most of my morning downloading all the available data on my performance and tried to identify the the causes of my largest hits and misses. The amount of data that Marketocracy can provide is truly phenomenal and it will actually even get better once the fund hits the 6 months compliant mark as some of the advanced reports need 6 months worth of data to become useful...I will detail what I found out in the next post but now I want to cover "the softer part" of this contest...</p>

<p>Let's start with a well known fact- in a short 6 months contest like this it is very difficult to separate the true investment talent from pure luck. "Get rich quick" kind of mentality is almost a must if you are trying to simply win by earning the highest return possible. That means that outsized bets, momentum darlings and/or sector funds should theoretically end up with a highest return every time.</p>

<p>The math is simple-at each point of the contest timeline there will be something that is "super hot" in the market- and being invested in just these few hot stocks or in one sector means that out of 500+ people there will be at least several, whose concentration will fall on exactly what is hot at that moment. Today it is solar and thus not surprisingly many of the top funds are heavily into the alternative energy.</p>

<p>But let's look back- during the first month and a half- sub prime ruled the SLO. Both I and "Demonhawk" Andrew have battled for the first place week after week. Then came the time of China- if you looked at most of Top 20 funds in September/October- they have been very heavily exposed to the Asian markets. Then came the time of BIDU, GRMN and AAPL, dry shippers followed ("Magickniner" made it into the TOP 5). We also had periods when Top 50 has been dominated by materials, agriculture etc... We even had three weeks when many of the Top funds have gone Short :) Now came the time of Solar energy- and while I confident it is temporarry-by coincidence it came right at the end and thus many of the previous best performing posters that have been in the Top 10 for much longer periods than the current leaders, have been now completely forgotten... </p>

<p>And it is not unusual - it is purely human of us to think that the last good movie we watched is best one we ever seen, that this latest hot electronic device we bought is something out of this world and there was nothing with an impact on the society before... But even with all of it's drawbacks this SLO contest has certainly been a terrific ride. I personally have been fortunate enough to ride through most of the "fear and greed" cycles in the Top 5 and I can state with great confidence- I enjoyed competing against all of you a great deal.</p>

<p>My personal thanks goes to many of you whose posts I enjoyed reading- the "Wildman of SLO"- Don Ferk, the "Sub Prime" king- Andrew Carlson, the "Shorting Maniac"- Jon Coyle, the "IT Slave Driver" Keith Barton, the "Mac Guy" Jeff Kalnitz, the "Trustee" Eileen Teska, the "TA Guru" Kevin Wilde, the "Man of Few Words" Kai Pettanen, the "Always Drunk Realtor" Duffbeer, the "Sailor Mate" Magickniner, the "Cut to the Chase and drop your BS" Gullapali and the "Man of convictions"- Tom Armistead and many others...</p>

<p>Many of you are not in the Top 10 today but as I said before- the cycle right now might not favor your style- but it does not mean that you do not deserve to be a finalist as far as I am concerned. I don't know if Ken, Mark and Co agree but who knows- this is not supposed to be a shoot for the "stars" (or should I say "Sun" :) ) contest so you never know howit will end up :) </p>

<p>Anyway good luck to all of you and as always, trade safe and cheers,<br />
Vad<br />
</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Part 2</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/2007/12/part_2.php" />
   <id>tag:www.investorplaceblogs.com,2007:/users/dishwasher//286.2132</id>
   
   <published>2007-12-19T04:46:11Z</published>
   <updated>2007-12-19T04:47:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Continued from the previous post US Dollar The above opinion also suggests that fears of further dollar declines are greatly exaggerated - Dollar is still a &quot;safe heaven&quot; currency and in combination with potentially more stable interest rates in the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Vad Yazvinski</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/dishwasher/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Continued from the previous post</p>

<p><strong>US Dollar</strong><br />
The above opinion also suggests that fears of further dollar declines are greatly exaggerated - Dollar is still a "safe heaven" currency and in combination with potentially more stable interest rates in the US in the short term I don't see much downside for USD here. I am not sure if a sustained rally could be in the works for the greenback, but I certainly believe that the period of severe decline is over for immediate future. USD- long</p>

<p><strong>Oil and other Commodities-short</strong><br />
If you believe in the recession outcome- Oil is a clear "sell" here, so is copper and other basic metals. Gold could hold up slightly better because of the fact that many use it as both an inflation and recession hedge. </p>

<p><strong>China-short</strong><br />
 I still think that China is a "bubble" and that it is going to burst sooner rather than later (6-12 months is my best guess). Overinvestment in capacity, obscene prices for real estate assets and equities, as well as the inefficiency of governance structure in general are almost certain to lead to an eventual severe slump. Chinese banks balance sheets are overloaded with bad assets and the simple fact that vast majority of the newly created Sovereign Wealth Fund will go towards shoring up the capital of the three large state banks, should have given all rational investors a pause. We have seen what happens when loans go bad en masse before (Japan fiasco) and while Chinese currency reserves could help protect the banking system from the complete eventual collapse they could also trigger a massive inflation spiral with potential social unrest as an outcome. FXI-short, FXP-long</p>

<p><strong>India-selective buys</strong><br />
I think that India will hold up better than most of other emerging markets because of lesser reliance on the resource sector and higher dependence on the tech sector that should hold up better in the downside scenario. Banking sector here is of a higher quality but is more concentrated with only few solid names to play with. I</p>

<p><strong>Russia- selective buys</strong><br />
My grim view of Russia turned slightly less bearish due to the fact that D. Medvedev has been in effect named as a "heir" to Putin. This is by far the BEST possible outcome for the West/Russia and will go a long way to supporting the equity markets. Real assets are certainly still way overpriced here, but assuming oil prices do not go back to $40 per barrel overnight - Russian consumers will hold up ok and thus eventual emerging market capital outflows from China could end up supporting Russian markets.</p>

<p><strong>Brazil and Latin America- selective buys</strong><br />
These markets have lagged the other emerging market economies until recently and thus on the surface are less prone to severe declines. But it is also obvious that the leftist governments of Venezuela, Bolivia and Co will end up destroying what's left of their economies relatively quickly, so I would stick with more stable countries like Brazil or Chile.  Mexico is likely to under perform due to its heavy dependence on the US in general and housing related industries in particular.</p>

<p><strong>Japan-short</strong><br />
I don't know what can help Japan in the next 10 years unless some dramatic shift in popular sentiment occurs- population is on the decline, regulatory environment is not friendly to investors etc... The era of Japan is over and the economy will continue to contract in lock step with population decline.</p>

<p><strong>Canada- short</strong><br />
Our neighbors are likely to be punished because of the deep dependence on US. Inflation has been held somewhat in check by stronger currency but that run is over now. I would look for stable/higher rates there combined with lower commodities prices.</p>

<p>In the next few days I will comment on my portfolio and continue describing my investment principles...</p>

<p>Trade safe and cheers,<br />
Vad</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
