InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.
As mentioned in a previous post, I try to use a disciplined method for selling stocks. It is not always easy to maintain the discipline and it is not a method recommended by Ken Kam (marketocracy leader), who tends to stay with his stock picks and looks for "doubles" and better. In a similar way, I do try to invest in stocks I think will move up a minimum of 30% up to 60%. However, in a contest timed over only 6 months, there may not be enough time to realize the higher percentage gains looked for by Ken Kam and even the more modest ones I try to capture.
This is one of the main reasons that, in this competition, I have carefully looked at my stocks that have rapidly gained and considered "rebalancing" them back to full positions. I have done that with RIMM, AAPL, and FCX. This method allows me to "lock in gains" and still have a full position for appreciation to my price targets.
When I purchase a stock, I try to set two price targets for each stock based on my valuation measures, 52 week stock ranges, and analyst targets. As the stock reaches the initial price target, I sell 1/2 of my position and let the rest "ride". If the stock reaches the second or "final" price target, I will usually sell the entire position unless there has been a fundamental change in the company or it's stock such that my initial targets should be revised.
Thus far, only one position (LVS) has reached my initial price target and then my final price target. The interesting thing about Las Vegas Sands is that it reached my initial price target on Sept. 11 ($105) and my final price target ($120) on Sept. 14th. Thus, in four days I sold half of my position and then all of it. In my experience, without substantial news, upgrades or earnings "beats", this is rather unusual. The percentage difference between the initial target and final target was 14.29%. With an appreciation that fast, it might have been a stock to stick with for longer than my final target. However, I realize that LVS is not universally felt to be a strong stock (rated low by Charles Schwab and others) and is driven by speculation that Macau will be a fantastic gaming area (and I think it will be). That "news driven" appreciation can leave as rapidly as it occurs. Thus, I felt that I should certainly stick with my price targets and sell the stock. Whenever this disciplined sell method is used, you run the risk of missing a further run up of the stock. One way to deal with this possibility is to sell only 1/2 of your remaining position when it reaches the final target. That is a reasonable approach, but I felt my risk of holding a stock that drops soon after reaching my target was greater than the risk of lost opportunity for further upside. Thus, LVS is no longer an active position in my account.
|