<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>DataViews</title>
      <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:29:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>SYNM - Synthetic Petroleum fuels</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've been aquiring a bit of SYNM - Syntroleum Corporation</p>

<p>Syntroleum specializes in the technology of synthesis of hydrocarbons </p>

<p>id est: they create "synthetic petroleum" fuels</p>

<p>the company owns the Syntroleum Process for Fischer-Tropsch (FT) <br />
conversion of synthesis gas derived from biomass, <br />
coal, natural gas, and other carbon-based feedstocks <br />
into liquid hydrocarbons (like gasoline or jet fuel);</p>

<p>wow, with the price of gas so high recently, <br />
the stock of such creators of new petroleum supplies <br />
would most likely be worth their high stock price</p>

<p>well, actually SYNM stock has dropped from $20 in 2000 <br />
to recently less then $1</p>

<p>SYNM made a discounted prepayment of $3.75 million <br />
to extinguish $6 million owed to Marathon Corporation</p>

<p>id est: SYNM settled the Marathon obligation at a 38% discount</p>

<p>SYNM has sold off their interests in all international oil and gas assets <br />
resulting in a gain on the sale of discontinued operations of $10.1 million during 2007</p>

<p>SYNM has reduced cash used in operating activities <br />
from $35.8 million in 2006 to $23.1 million in 2007, <br />
and are projecting  cash used in operating activities would be <br />
$7.8 million in 2008 and $6.5 million in 2009. </p>

<p>On March 6, 2008, SYNM sold off their corporate offices and lab facilities, <br />
receiving approximately $1.3 million for the property; <br />
and SYNM has moved to leased office space in Tulsa, </p>

<p>Cost reductions associated with the sale of their office complex <br />
will result in further annual overhead reductions of approximately $250,000</p>

<p>hmmm, </p>

<p>well with the stock price so low, <br />
there wouldn't seem to be much <br />
short selling potential left</p>

<p>and besides, this contest only rates long positions</p>

<p>however actually, as I started off stating, <br />
I've recently been aquiring (long position) SYNM</p>

<p>hmmm, </p>

<p>since I've already given reason for the recent low stock price, </p>

<p>I'll now try to justify why I'm aquiring the stock for upside speculation</p>

<p>it seems that there had been some recent adverse weather in New Orleans, <br />
creating some economic distress in the region</p>

<p>in response to the devastation caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita </p>

<p>a "GO Zone" bond program provided Louisiana with $7.8 billion <br />
in tax-free borrowing capacity to distribute to private business developments <br />
to help spur growth in hurricane-impacted parishes. </p>

<p>More than $4 billion of the approved GO Zone bonds <br />
have not been issued and the allocations expire April 22</p>

<p>the Interest rates tend to be among the lowest cost available, <br />
with rates priced at approximately two-thirds of LIBOR plus a credit spread.</p>

<p>well, SYNM would seem to be liquidating everything they can <br />
so that they can put up $12 million of cash, <br />
to set up a Dynamic Fuels project which will convert <br />
poultry by-products from Tyson Foods into fuel</p>

<p>SYNM currently has a $1.1 million contract with the U.S. Air Force <br />
to create 500 gallons of Bio-Synthetic Jet Fuel. </p>

<p>Operations have started at Southwest Research Institute's <br />
1 bbl/day alternative fuels pilot plant in San Antonio, Texas.  </p>

<p>the pilot plant runs provide process design validation <br />
for the Dynamic Fuels project</p>

<p>The "feedstock" of the commercial process are duplicated at the pilot plant; <br />
consisting of 45% poultry fat, 19% brown grease, 18% yellow grease, <br />
9% floatation grease, and 9% miscellaneous fats; </p>

<p>converting the poultry byproducts into high quality jet fuel</p>

<p>oh, back to the Louisianna commercial plant</p>

<p>SYNM has hired a SunTrust Robinson Humphrey<br />
to underwrite Go Zone bonds <br />
for construction of the first plant in Geismar, Louisiana</p>

<p>SunTrust has significant experience with Go Zone bonds, <br />
having sucessfully completed 7 transactions for in excess of $800 million </p>

<p>Tyson and Syntroleum have elected to pursue Go Zone Bonds <br />
because the location of the project in Ascension Parish in Louisiana <br />
qualifies the Geismar project for these special circumstance tax exempt municipal bonds, </p>

<p>which is the lowest-cost form of financing they have encountered. </p>

<p>On March 19, 2008, Dynamic Fuels filed an application <br />
with the Louisiana State Bond Commission,  <br />
through the Louisiana Public Facilities Authority (or LPFA),  <br />
to issue Revenue Bonds for up to $135 million <br />
to finance the construction of the Dynamic Fuels plant in Geismar. </p>

<p>Upon approval, the bonds would satisfy financing obligations <br />
for 100% of the budgeted commercial plant capital costs</p>

<p>The Geismar project ranks #6 in Louisiana investment attributes, <br />
when compared to the 687 projects announced by the <br />
Louisiana Department of Economic Development in fiscal year 2006</p>

<p>at current fuel prices: the pro forma cash operating margin <br />
at the Geismar plant will be $1.10 per gallon, <br />
or annualized $81 million per year. </p>

<p>the payback period on the plant would be just 2.2 years on a pre-tax basis,<br />
so they are confident that this level of cash flow <br />
can easily service $135 million of municipal bond financing. </p>

<p>the market capitalization for the entire Syntroleum Corporation <br />
amounts to $85 million<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=SYNM">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=SYNM</a></p>

<p>with potential earnings of $81 million per year <br />
from the Dynamic Fuels Geismar project</p>

<p>the facts of this posting were obtained from the <br />
Syntroleum April 2, 2008 Conference Call Script exhibit 99.1<br />
(a copy of which is on file with the SEC)</p>

<p>FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: <br />
I personally own a bit of SYMN stock <br />
in addition to my virtual contest holdings<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/04/synm_-_synthetic_petroleum_fuels.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/04/synm_-_synthetic_petroleum_fuels.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:29:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>USEG - US Energy Corp.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am speculating a bit on USEG - US Energy Corp.</p>

<p>I began research on the company <br />
based upon their Uranium holdings </p>

<p>however according to Standard &  Poor's:<br />
"The uranium mineral assets and associated commercial assets were sold in 2007"</p>

<p>the companies stock price has been driven down quite dramatically recently</p>

<p>there were recent news reports about proposed changes in mining laws, <br />
the company had been planning to develop a molybdenum mine</p>

<p>today (April 17, 2008) the company would seem to be selling <br />
at a price less then the value of the cash the campany has</p>

<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=USEG">finance.yahoo.com</a><br />
reports that the company has about $70 million in cash <br />
(with only about $5 million of debt)</p>

<p>as for how to earn some income with the company's cash:<br />
Standard & Poor's USEG Factual Stock Report (April 12, 2008)<br />
"USEG is building a mid-size multifamily apartment complex in Gillette,Wyoming," <br />
"At mid-March 2008, the entire project was about 60% finished"</p>

<p>financial disclosure:<br />
I believe that I should disclose that I personally own some USEG stock </p>

<p>the company is a very "small capitalization" company, <br />
and such thinly traded stocks can sometimes get quite volatile in price </p>

<p>speculators should be very careful about such thinly traded small cap stocks</p>

<p>of the 24 million shares of USEG stock outstanding, <br />
almost 50% of the stock is held by institutions and insiders<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/04/useg_-_us_energy_corp.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/04/useg_-_us_energy_corp.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:35:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>tulip bulbs or gold?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>my current market outlook is that of <br />
not being able to see much hope for <br />
any significant market rally based upon <br />
new inflows of investment money</p>

<p>it would seem to me that <br />
"the Fed's" drastic interest rate cuts <br />
have confirmed investment community fears <br />
of an impending economy downturn;</p>

<p>however those radical interest rate cuts <br />
does not seem to have alleviated much <br />
of the current market apprehension. </p>

<p><a href="http://WallStreetGecko.com">http://WallStreetGecko.com</a></p>

<p>I'm still rather confident in the value of gold </p>

<p>the current downward price pressure on the commodity <br />
might tend to offer favorable aquisition timing</p>

<p>in my contest portfolio I'm increasing my holdings of: <br />
<strong>BVN</strong> - Compania de Minas Buenaventura SA<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/04/tulip_bulbs_or_gold.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/04/tulip_bulbs_or_gold.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:03:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>$100 oil $1000 gold</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I continue to hold my opinion of <br />
$100 oil and $1000 gold becoming the new norm<br />
(the new floor support pricing)</p>

<p>as set forth in my previous blog <br />
"the demise of comfortable markets"<br />
(February 27 2008)</p>

<p>and as reptialian amplified by: <br />
the <A href="http://WallStreetGecko.com"> WallStreetGecko </A> <BR></p>

<p>interesting trade strategies are being facilitated by <br />
the existance of counter-opinion <br />
expecting a retracement of the <br />
recent high commodity pricing </p>

<p>I have added to my holdings of oil refiners <br />
when their stock prices recently became more attractive  </p>

<p>although pricing of gold mining companies <br />
has remained too high for me to <br />
consider such investment as being value timing opportunity </p>

<p>overall, it is rather depressing to consider that <br />
reptilian concepts might be what works on Wall Street </p>

<p>greed is ... ?</p>

<p>although in attempts to be fair, <br />
it might be reptilian survival instinct, <br />
rather then reptilian greed, <br />
which is fueling the higher commodity pricing </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/03/100_oil_1000_gold.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/03/100_oil_1000_gold.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:14:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>the dimise of comfortable markets</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I need to post something so as to remain in this contest;</p>

<p>my Mom died a few days before Christmas, <br />
and I haven't accomplished much of anything lately;</p>

<p>in American culture one is probably not supposed to admit it, <br />
but I've lived home with my parents my entire life; <br />
my Mom was 87 years old, and my Dad is now 90 years old; </p>

<p>well anyway, its been especially difficult for me emotionally </p>

<p>I believe that there is a philsosophical concept about <br />
trying to shift negative experiences into something positive; <br />
or to at least learn something from experiences in life;</p>

<p>and this is a stock market contest, so:</p>

<p>I guess that an analogy can be found <br />
about the stock market environment, </p>

<p>people have a tendency to become rather complacent <br />
believing that the comfortable market environment <br />
will always be there;  </p>

<p>it tends to be rather difficult to admit that things change; </p>

<p>actaully, it would seem that the entire universe <br />
is rather dynamic in nature </p>

<p>one needs to continue breathing for life to continue </p>

<p>when the dynamics stop, <br />
well the universe doesn't seem to favor such situation</p>

<p>I went to college for engineering <br />
(and also banking finance and investments) <br />
the concept of entropy is based upon such dynamics</p>

<p>well anyway, markets go up and down, <br />
and the differences in opinion is required <br />
for there to be 2 sides to every trade </p>

<p>I believe that I read an editorial in Barron's (DowJones) magazine recently <br />
which explained the former president Harry Truman <br />
was quoted as saying that what he wanted was <br />
a one armed economist </p>

<p>all his economic advisors always viewed the economy as <br />
"on one hand this", "but on the other hand that"</p>

<p>well, on the concept of trying to find credibility <br />
in a society which would seem to be based upon <br />
politics of each politician explaining how <br />
the other candidate is no good, <br />
but yet one of the various "no goods" <br />
becomes the next "leader"</p>

<p>I'm personally chosing to believe the <br />
one side of the opinion which seems to <br />
predict economic "slowdown" <br />
(I don't believe that the term "downturn" <br />
is politically acceptable with the current political administration)</p>

<p>I also am anticipating inflation catching up with the <br />
easy money policies which caused the housing bubble</p>

<p>I'm expecting $100/barrel oil pricing to hold, <br />
and am also expecting $100/ounce gold to be the norm </p>

<p>my understanding is that even though <br />
the price of oil has tripled ($30 to $100) <br />
the higher pricing has not caused <br />
any significant decrease in demand </p>

<p>I'm investing in oil refiner profits  <br />
such as VLO (Valero) and WNR (Western Refining)<br />
as well as owners of oil COP (Conoco Philips)</p>

<p>although it might sound strange, <br />
I am also investing in <br />
airlines such as LCC (US Airways); <br />
although airline profits are effected <br />
by the cost of their fuel, <br />
I don't expect an end to air transportation </p>

<p>I expect that people will get used to the higher oil  prices <br />
and those costs will eventually be passed along to consumers <br />
(like I said, I'm also expecting inflation)<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/02/the_dimise_of_comfortable_markets.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2008/02/the_dimise_of_comfortable_markets.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:04:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>bored with depressing market</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I don't know about you, </p>

<p>however the reptilian WallStreetGecko <br />
<a href="http://wallstreetgecko.com">WallStreetGecko.com</a><br />
seems to be getting a bit bored <br />
with the current depressing mood of the stock market</p>

<p>(the reptile is also currently giving golf tips)</p>

<p>what's the ole cliche?  </p>

<p>never under-estimate the lack of depth of a retilian brain?<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/bored_with_depressing_market.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/bored_with_depressing_market.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:53:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WallStreetWabbit.com</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>sometimes re-edits of blogs don't work very well: the correct IP:<br />
coming soon :<br />
<a href="http://wallstreetwabbit.com">http://WallStreetWabbit.com</a><br />
(should have verified this prior to posting my recent SRSL posting)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/wallstreetwabbitcom.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/wallstreetwabbitcom.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:30:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SRSL Labs - donquixote explanation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>for those who might be curious, <br />
but not curious enough to sort through all of the imagery involved <br />
so as to try to figure out what is goin on: </p>

<p>"VikingWarrior" posted:</p>

<p>'Somwhen between 1988 & 1990, A Viking Warrior bought a stock <br />
in a pre-Dot.Bomb High Tech Company which had just IPO'd. <br />
The Insiders kept 60% and Floated 40% to John Q. Public. <br />
The Prospects were Bright and the Investment started to bear fruit. <br />
It had ALL the HallMarks of a " Rocket in yer Pocket". <br />
Then one fine day, the Management decided to " Take the Company Private". <br />
The Board of Directos approved of the "Profferred Offer" '</p>

<p>perhaps in reference to my postings about <strong>SRSL</strong> <br />
(the SRSL in VikingWarrior's posting title gives me that impression)</p>

<p>SRSL is a rather small company<br />
(a bit similar to a <a href="http://wallstreetwabbit.com"><strong>wabbit</strong></a> in a market of bulls and bears)</p>

<p>however a small company holding quite significant patents </p>

<p>in a stock market of quite powerful players, such as Sony,  <br />
who are involved in consumer products featuring audio technology </p>

<p>well, like I said, SRSL holds significant patent rights <br />
to the sophisticated technology developed by Hughes Aerospace</p>

<p>you see, the U.S. military was quite concerned about <br />
their battlefield personnel being able to correctly hear orders broadcast to them, <br />
(battlefields tend to get quite noisy with bombs and such)<br />
well anyway, Hughes developed what some consider to be the <br />
premiere technology to enhance human speech <br />
to make it more intelligible in adverse environments </p>

<p>SRS Labs are currently negotiating with European cell phone leaders <br />
to incorporate SRSL speech inteligibility, and also surround sound, <br />
capabilities in the next generation of multi-media cell phones;<br />
and also with Japanese auto-manufacturers for auto audio enhancement <br />
(Pioneer and Kenwood automotive audio) </p>

<p>well, Sony, being so big, relative to small SRSL, <br />
just might consider it to be more cost effective <br />
to take over micro-cap SRSL <br />
rather then paying fair patent license fees to SRSL </p>

<p>coming soon :<br />
<a href="http://wallstreetwabbit.com">http://WallStreetWabbit.com</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/srsl_labs_-_donquixote_explanation.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/srsl_labs_-_donquixote_explanation.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:51:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SRSL (SRS Labs Inc)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I can't figure out how to respond to comments about my postings; <br />
so best I can do is try to respond in a new posting: </p>

<p>my original posted was that:</p>

<p>SRS Labs has announced that they will commence a <strong><strong>stock buyback</strong></strong>, <br />
in which SRS may acquire up to $10 million of its outstanding common stock, <br />
commencing November 12, 2007 and continue for a six month period.</p>

<p>which would seem to be about <strong>10% of their shares outstanding</strong> </p>

<p>VikingWarrior responded to my posting commenting about SRSL that:</p>

<p>the stock buyback involves "Cashing Out" <br />
Insider selling - All "sold", no "buy" <br />
& thsre is a list of Form 144 (pre-planned) sales,etc.</p>

<p>I can not find any substantiation for VikingWarrior's comment;<br />
the official government SEC website has no such Form 144 <br />
listed as being filed in the last year or so</p>

<p>insider trades listed are:<br />
June 7 2007   David R. Dukes exercised 11,000 options at $5.44 resold at $14.96<br />
May 18, 2007 Winston E. Hickman exercised 12,500 options at $4.60 resold at $13.39</p>

<p>the $10 Million stock buyback would amount to more then 1,700,000 share at today's closing price ($5.82)<br />
no where's near the amount of options routinely cashed in by management</p>

<p>finance.Yahoo.com reports a: <br />
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 14.61 <br />
<strong>Forward P/E</strong> (fye 31-Dec-08) 1: <strong>10.46 </strong><br />
which substantiates earnings are improving quite nicely</p>

<p>I find no SEC filings which would substantiate VikingWarrior's comment<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/srsl_srs_labs_inc.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/srsl_srs_labs_inc.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:32:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SRSL - (SRS Labs Inc.)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've increased my investment in <strong>SRSL</strong> (SRS Labs Inc)</p>

<p>as an update to my previous (September 2007) posting on <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/09/srsl_-_srs_labs_inc.php">SRS Labs Inc</a></p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKWNAS083620071106?rpc=44">Reuters reported on November 6, 2007 </a>that <br />
SRS Labs Inc (SRSL) reported earning in line with estimates, <br />
earnings up to .10/share compared to .08/share a year ago </p>

<p>finance.Yahoo.com reports a:<br />
Trailing P/E (ttm, intraday): 14.61 <br />
Forward <strong>P/E</strong> (fye 31-Dec-08) 1: <strong>10.46</strong> </p>

<p>SRS Labs has announced that they will commence a <strong>stock buyback</strong>, <br />
in which SRS may acquire up to $10 million of its outstanding common stock, <br />
commencing November 12, 2007 and continue for a six month period.</p>

<p>that would seem to be about <strong>10% of their shares outstanding</strong></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/srsl_-_srs_labs_inc.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/srsl_-_srs_labs_inc.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:42:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>this contest, Cramer, ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've been contemplating the concepts <br />
of this Microsoft sponsored contest</p>

<p>it would seem that what Microsoft (MSN)<br />
would seem to be looking for <br />
would be the next (CNBC) Jim Cramer</p>

<p>who, by the way, reportedly includes Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer <br />
as being one of his old buddies back from their days at Harvard </p>

<p>it would seem to me that one of the things that Jim Cramer <br />
is most criticized for is that his stock picks <br />
enjoy a "pumping up" effect from the CNBC media they receive; </p>

<p>when his stock picks are <br />
mathematically scrutinized over the longer term, <br />
the mathematical facts seem to indicate <br />
the most profitable investment strategy <br />
would actually work out to be <br />
shorting Cramer stock picks <br />
at their media induced pumped up state </p>

<p>these Cramer facts being based upon the August 2007 scrutiny <br />
of the folks of DowJones publishing (Barron's/Wall Street Journal) </p>

<p>there was also found to be some rather questionable <br />
stock trading activity prior to Jim Cramer's stocks <br />
being pumped by mega-CNBC</p>

<p>Jim Cramer has told reporters that he is not involved <br />
in any personal stock trading benefit from <br />
the CNBC media publicised stock selections</p>

<p>I  was wondering if it is even possible to <br />
run a "contest" such as this one <br />
which would isolate stock analytic skills <br />
from media induced pumping effects </p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
for those who might not know who Jim Cramer is, <br />
he would seem to answer the rhetorical question of <br />
"hows the stock market doing?"<br />
in one of the most popular YouTube videos: <br />
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=cYPtCmdFCrc">http://youtube.com/watch?v=cYPtCmdFCrc</a><br />
he starts winding up about the first minute into the video,<br />
and really gets going about 2 1/2 minutes into the YouTube video;</p>

<p>you really gotta see it to believe it<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/this_contest_cramer_.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/11/this_contest_cramer_.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:35:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>market characterized by uncertainty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>it would seem to me that the stock market is currently characterized by uncertainty; </p>

<p>in economic cycles: lowering interest rates tends to signal impending recession</p>

<p>"the fed" lowered interest rates again today, seeming to be quite careful <br />
not to use the "housing recession" expression; <br />
instead chosing to call it an <br />
"intensification of the housing correction"</p>

<p>such "intensification" seems to even show up in <br />
"intense" price movements in stocks such as MGI  <br />
which has a significant customer base of <br />
illegal aliens who utilize their service to send money back home, <br />
(bank transfers of money requires identification)</p>

<p>in a current environment of housing related (construction) jobs drying up ... </p>

<p>such future money transfer business expectations might tend to ... </p>

<p>well anyway, MGI seems to have managed to draw down just about all of their <br />
revolving credit line because of "market losses" in their investment portfolio,<br />
causing the credit ratings agencies to start to issue warnings</p>

<p>stock analysts have also mentioned mortgage exposure of MGI</p>

<p>back in July the Washington Post reported that Western Union expected <br />
second-quarter results for their money transfer business to be hurt <br />
by the immigration debate in the U.S. Congress as immigrants feared <br />
that wiring money back to their home countries would attract government attention.</p>

<p>please note correction of prior posting:<br />
Western Union and MoneyGram are seperate companies<br />
Western Union was founded in 1851 <br />
whereas MoneyGram was founded in 1926</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
oil refining "crack spread" would also seem to be evaporating away, <br />
making oil refining currently less profitable <br />
<a href="http://wallstreetgecko.com">WallStreetGecko.com</a></p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
it would seem to be a market of speculative moves <br />
in a market characterized by uncertainty<br />
 <br />
in my non-contest portfolios I'm betting on a few solid dividend type stocks, <br />
however such relatively "safe" investment style would not seem to qualify <br />
in such a high risk contest environment </p>

<p>in the stock market: high gains most usually require assuming a higher risk; <br />
which I'm not that comfortable with in a market characterized by uncertainty.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/market_characterized_by_uncert_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/market_characterized_by_uncert_1.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:26:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>VLO - (Valero) oil pricing contango</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>VLO - (Valero Energy Corp's) core business is oil refining<br />
 <br />
65% of the oil that Valero processes <br />
is purchased by Valero at prices determined by long term contracts <br />
(35% is bought on the spot market)</p>

<p>such strategy reflects a "bet" placed on <br />
continuing high future oil prices; <br />
which reflects the current market contango conditions <br />
<a href="http://WallStreetGecko.com/oil_pricing.html">WallStreetGecko.com</a></p>

<p>sort of like the recent real estate market <br />
where expectations of future higher pricing <br />
justified buying multiple houses <br />
speculating that prices will continue to rise </p>

<p>problem is that if conditions, <br />
such as an impending Turkisk invasion of Kurdish northern Irag, <br />
dissapates, and thereby eases forward market pricing expectations, <br />
well at such point in time the market might tend to become <br />
flooded with product as current inventory gets sold off <br />
in attempts to capture peak prices; </p>

<p>a market becoming "flooded" with product <br />
would tend to result in a switch in future price expectations </p>

<p>Valero, which is contractually obligated to pay the prices <br />
agreed to in their long term contracts, <br />
might be adversely effected by a reduction of contango </p>

<p>I've reduced my exposure to Valero<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/vlo_-_valero_oil_pricing_contango.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/vlo_-_valero_oil_pricing_contango.php</guid>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">VLO</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:26:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>NVEC - (NVE Corporation)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>this posting is an update to my July 2007 posting <br />
about my holdings of NVEC - (NVE Corporation) <br />
who develops and sells devices that use <strong>spintronics</strong>, <br />
a nanotechnology that relies on electron spin rather than electron charge<br />
to acquire, store and transmit information. </p>

<p>NVEC has been awarded numerous awards including <br />
IBD 100: Investor's Business Daily list of  "leading stocks trading in the U.S., <br />
showing superior earnings, strong price performance and leadership within their industry." </p>

<p>in addition to the other business awards to NVEC<br />
<a href="http://www.nve.com/awards.php">http://www.nve.com/awards.php</a></p>

<p>I'm impressed by NVEC being awarded <br />
a NASA Certificate of Appreciation </p>

<p>it seems that their new "spintronic" technology, <br />
is more radiation hardy for space applications <br />
being based upon electron spin (rather then electric charge)<br />
it is inherently more impervious to cosmic ray damage in space<br />
(electron spin is harder to disrupt then electric charge is)</p>

<p>NVEC was also awarded the 2007 Tibbetts Award <br />
which is based upon "economic impact of technological innovation; <br />
business achievement and effective collaborations;"</p>

<p>the Tibbitts Award is sponsored by <br />
the National Science Foundation, NASA, and DARPA<br />
<a href="http://www.zyn.com/tibbetts/about.htm">http://www.zyn.com/tibbetts/about.htm</a></p>

<p>as far as financial aspects of NVEC's current business activities<br />
the most recent NVEC form 10Q filed with the SEC yesterday (October 17, 2007) states:</p>

<p>Product sales for the recent quarter increased 14% compared to the prior-year quarter <br />
Net income for the second quarter of fiscal 2008 increased 28% compared to the prior-year quarter.</p>

<p>the first six months of fiscal 2008, product sales increased 26% compared to last year</p>

<p>Net income for the first half of fiscal 2008 was $0.67 per diluted share <br />
compared to $0.45 per diluted share, for the first half of fiscal 2007.</p>

<p>NVEC's business exhibits strong growth, <br />
and NVEC has been granted numerous patents  <br />
indicating solid future prospects</p>

<p>NVEC is currently working to improve business even more <br />
by developing new sensors for automotive applications<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/nvec_-_nve_corporation.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/nvec_-_nve_corporation.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:56:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>EMC - (EMC Corporation)     VMW - (VMware)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've been trying to analyze EMC and VMWare (VMW) </p>

<p>there would seem to be a lot of maket speculation in those stocks, <br />
so I'm trying to obtain an understanding of what's going on</p>

<p>first, from reading the SEC filings: <br />
EMC spun off VMware in a quite successful IPO, <br />
Intel purchased 9.5 million newly issued shares of VMware's Class A common stock at $23.00 per share, and<br />
Cisco Systems purchased 6.0 million shares of VMware Class A common stock at $25.00 per share; </p>

<p>EMC still owns 26,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock <br />
and all 300,000,000 shares of our Class B common stock, <br />
representing approximately 86% of the total outstanding shares of common stock <br />
or 98% of the voting power of outstanding common stock</p>

<p>trying to research the SEC filings gets quite interesting, <br />
trying to follow the CISCO ownership for example, one encounters: <br />
Cisco Systems International B.V. ("CSIBV") of The Netherlands<br />
Cisco Systems Netherlands Holdings B.V. ("CSNHBV") of The Netherlands<br />
Cisco Systems Luxembourg S.a.r.l. ("CSLS") of  Luxembourg <br />
Cisco Systems Luxembourg International S.a.r.l. ("CSLIS") of  Luxembourg<br />
Cisco Systems International S.a.r.l. ("CSIS") of Switzerland<br />
Cisco Systems (Bermuda) Limited ("CSBL") of Bermuda<br />
Cisco Systems International Holdings Limited ("CSIHL") of Bermuda <br />
Cisco Technology, Inc. ("CTI"), I.R.S. Identification No. 77-0462351 of the State of California<br />
Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), I.R.S. Identification No. 77-0059951 of the State of California<br />
which is quite an impressive network (hmmm, a CISCO network pun?), <br />
and perhaps representive of trying to do SEC filing research, <br />
but Cisco is still a rather minority owner,  <br />
considering that EMC itself still owns 86% of VMWare stock</p>

<p>when one tries to value the EMC holdings of VMWare <br />
the first problem is that the most recent EMC SEC filing <br />
is their 10Q dated for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2007; <br />
which was prior to the August 2007 initial public offering ("IPO") <br />
which spun off 37,950,000 shares of VMware</p>

<p>in their June 30, 2007 10Q EMC reports Total Stockholder Equity of $10,638,304,000<br />
(there are 2,100,000,000 shares of EMC outstanding)</p>

<p>hmmm, that $10B EMC stockholder equity doe not seem to include <br />
the $37.1B market cap of VMware <br />
(which EMC owns 86% of)</p>

<p>however there is a discrepancy between the<br />
$10B Stockholder Equity EMC reported to the SEC as of June 30, 2007 <br />
and the current $47B Market Cap of EMC</p>

<p>stock market speculators seem to be buying EMC <br />
for the purpose of cashing in on EMC's holdings of 86% of VMware stock</p>

<p>which might be a good idea, <br />
if VMware is actually worth its $37B maket cap</p>

<p>however VMware has actaul earnings of less then $1 <br />
per each share which is selling for around $100</p>

<p>but Intel and Cisco bought VMware IPO stock you say?<br />
yeah, but at $25 per share, not the current $100, <br />
much different Price/Earnings ratio</p>

<p>one other thing that I feel is worth noting is that <br />
a significant portion VMware products/technologies <br />
is based upon "open source" software, <br />
(GNU General Public License, the GNU Lesser General Public License, <br />
"Apache-style" licenses, "Berkeley Software Distribution," "BSD-style" licenses)</p>

<p>for years my personal computers are dual boot (Windows XP/Linux); <br />
I believe that the free Linux Xen virtualization software <br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xen">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xen</a>  <br />
is very similar to VMwares core products</p>

<p>and, Microsoft also seems to be quite active in <br />
developing competing Virtual Machine Operating Systems </p>

<p>well, the market momentum is currently tending to favor <br />
speculation in EMC (and VMware)</p>

<p>I have a little invested in the current market frenzy, </p>

<p>based upon the John Maynard Keynes quote that <a href="http://SuziQuant.com">SuziQuant.com</a> noted <br />
about the stock markets ability to stay irrational</p>

<p>although I am quite skeptical about any such tulip speculation<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/emc_-_emc_corporation_vmw_-_vmware.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/donquixote/2007/10/emc_-_emc_corporation_vmw_-_vmware.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:01:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
