Register
Hello, !
Edit Profile | Logout

The Long and Short of Shorting

Rating: 2.25 (8 votes)    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

In a recent blog entry, Keith Barton asked to see an article regarding how to short. His recent blog, "Double? Ultra? That means the brick wall is twice as hard", explains his recent dealings with short ETFs. Though I am far from an expert, I will give the down and dirty of shorting and several reasons you should do it. I will begin by discussing the mechanics of shorting, then discuss how it pertains to the SLO, and wrap it up by discussing the pros and cons of shorting. As many of you know, my portfolio is made up entirely of ultra short ETFs.

First of all, we have to know what shorting really is. Shorting is when a stock trader "borrows" a brokers stock for a particular company and sells it on the open market. After a period of time, the trader returns the borrowed stock back to the broker by buying it back on the open market. If the stock has fallen in price, the trader returns the stock to the broker and pockets the change. The buying back of a shorted stock is called "covering". If the stock has risen in price when the trader covers, then the trader pays the difference and loses money. The goal for "short sellers" is to see the stock fall in price as much as possible before buying it back to returning the shares to the broker. The bigger the fall in stock price, the bigger the payday for the short seller.

In the SLO, you cannot short an individual stock. It took me a while to figure this out. When the game started, I was extremely busy and I didn't have a lot of time to learn the Marketocracy site as it pertained to the SLO. I wanted to short individual stocks, and since I couldn't, I decided to short the market by buying long stakes in Exchange Traded Funds that specialized in shorting. This has actually been better for me since it gave instant diversity and allowed me to do what I wanted in the first place--short the market. I am not aware of the many choices of short ETFs that exist and are able to be traded on Marketocracy, but I am very familiar with Pro Shares short and ultra short ETFs, and my portfolio is stacked with them. To get a full listing of the Pro Shares ETF offerings, go to proshares.com and click on the "short and ultra short" icon, as our SLO brother Keith Barton did. I have been told about other companies offering short ETFs for the Chinese markets, but I have done no research on them at this point in time. My suggestion would be to spend 20 minutes of efficient research to see what is out there and then see if it can be traded on Marketocracy or your personal portfolio. With Proshares, you can also get lower risk short ETFs if the Ultra Shorts are a little too wild for your taste. Instead of getting DXD, which seeks to inversely double the Dow, you can get DOG, which seeks to be a perfect inverse match to the Dow.

Now for the Pros and Cons of shorting. The biggest Pro that I see with shorting is that few people do it. To defeat the competition, you must have an edge. Shorting can be the edge because few do it. Shorting is also much easier than it used to be due to the abolishment of the "uptick rule", a subject I covered in an earlier blog entry. Everyone knows how to buy long because that is what we have been taught since the beginning. Shorting has existed for many decades now, but has never been that popular. Some believe that it is ethically wrong to bet (and hope) that a company will go down and suffer. If you want to beat the other guy, you must do what the other guy is not doing, and shorting falls in that category. Look back at the history of any stock or index . . . there are periods of high times and periods of low times. No one is immune to the cycles, even the great Warren Buffett. Don't believe me? Check out what happened to Berkshire Hathaway. Those investors that bought BRKA at $78,000 at the beginning of 1999 probably cursed the genius less than a year later when it was sitting a little above $42,000. Most people believe that when the times get tough, you just need to buckle down your research tools and find that one gem that will rise as the markets fall. Hogwash. Sell the market or stock short and profit as it goes down. If you buy long, you beat the market when you lose 15% on an investment while the S&P is losing 20% during the same time period, but who wants to lose money? I'd rather stuff my money in a bank and let inflation take its toll than to have large percentages blown away in a bear market. By shorting the market, especially in a bear market, you can eek out gains while everyone else is losing. However, even if you don't eek out gains, the shorts can provide a hedge that will reduce the damage to your portfolio while you wait for the market to turn the corner. Want to know another great thing about the short ETFs? They pay dividends, too!

Another pro with shorting is that you can use the same research in shorting a stock as you do in buying a stock long. What parameters do you use to determine whether or not to buy a stock long? P/E? Technical analysis? Historical cycles? Lunar Cycles? You use research to determine what makes a stock an attractive buy, and you can use the same research to determine what makes a stock an attractive short sell. What makes a company a bad buy? What makes a company's stock take a significant dive over a 6-12 month period? Figure it out, and you can be successful at selling the stock short. I have never understood traders who can put time and research into picking successful long buys while saying at the same time shorting is "too risky". Everyone has been trash talking Fannie Mae recently, and if you believe what you are saying, put your money where your mouth is. Would you short Fannie Mae in your real life portfolio? How far will Fannie Fall? At the end of September, I dumped on the big banks in my blog "An October Reckoning", and since then Citi has went from $48 per share to about $32 per share. Go compute that percentage. You can stack the odds in your favor by shorting in a bear market. China may be in bubble territory right now, so if you could short the China market and the bubble bursts, you celebrate while others cry. It is the ultimate contrarian play. . . sell the bubble market short when everyone is buying. It's dangerous ground in the bubble, but the payoff can be big if you can tolerate the risk. If you can figure out how to spot a company that is going to run itself into the ground, then you will be an incredibly successful short seller.

Now for some of the cons.

Let's use Apple stock as an example of how shorting can't pan out as well as longing a stock. In mid 2006, AAPL was at $50 per share. Now it is over $160, a three-fold gain. If you short a stock at $50 per share and it drops to zero, you make $50, or 100%. If it goes to $160, you have lost over 300%. There is no profit ceiling when you buy long, but there is a profit ceiling with shorts. At the same time, there is a bottom when it comes to losses when you buy long. When you sell short, there is no bottom and the possibility of unlimited losses exists.

Another con is that the stock market, when taken in the long term, always tends to go up. According to the Leuthold Group, a Minneapolis money manager that researches market history, the market goes up 66% of the time and down 34% of the time. Take any twenty year period (as long as you aren't starting on October 29th, 1929) and you will have an overall gain. You will not make money shorting in the long term. Shorting is effective only when you hit it toward the beginning of the bear market or if you are talented enough to spot the bad stocks during a market bull. Berkshire Hathaway plummeted over 40% after 1999, but it turned upward and erased the losses in about 4 years. It is more about timing with shorts, and most people get the timing all wrong. With shorts, you must be a correct market timer two times, once when picking the time to short and another when to cover the short. Since the market is a going up 66% of the time, the odds are against you in hitting it close to perfect both times. When shorting a stock or an index, you must have a pre-determined exit point and stick to it.

There are dangers of losing big in short selling, and I recommend practicing with Marketocracy for a while before trying it in the real world. However, by careful research and practice along with some humility, shorts can be an addition to a portfolio that can pay off.

There are several terms associated with shorting that I will not talk about here, only because I can link you to people that can articulate it so much better. Below you will find two examples, one from Marketocracy and one from fool.com. Marketocracy explains the terminology, and the fool article has answers to frequently asked questions.

http://www.marketocracy.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Portfolio.woa/ps/ArticleViewPage/source=MdEcEdBlEbHgJmKiMaKiAbDm

http://www.fool.com/FoolFAQ/FoolFAQ0033.htm

I tip my hat to the SLO leaders; I have watched you from the bottom for a long time now. It's coming down to the home stretch, now let's see if I can catch up.

--Jonathan

Comments (8)

don ferk:

Jonathan,

Jonathan is from the Hebrew meaning "God has Given".

...Great Blog. Maximum Stars from me.

...The only thing I might add is that
shorting can only be taken so far. The 'antidote" to shorting is the Dreaded R&S.
There have been occasions in the History of the Market when Investors have taken posssession of their stock Certificates rather than keeping their stock in "Street Name" with a Broker or other Financial nstitution.

This is accomplished by directing your Broker to " Register and Ship ".

...If Investors or the Funds which Manage Investor's money start a 'Movement' to R&S, The Shorts 'Must' be Called in - regardless of Price or Margin Requirements. The R&S Tactic is a legal form of "Cornering the Market".

The Shorts must BUY Back stock in a condition where not much "Float" is available. The COST
of the LOSS is typically Horrendous.

...The only problem with holding certificates
is that they are not easily tradable. They must be delivered 'physically' to the Broker's office at least 5 days before a Sale can be closed.
Also,they must be kept in Safe Deposit Box or a Dry, FireProof place. If lost,stolen or destroyed, it might take more than a month for the Registation Agent to provide new certificate and 'Cancel" the old ones in the Company's Registry.
The Dividends are mailed to you, so you have to keep track of the income for Tax reporting purposes.

A stock's Price can only Go to Zero, but there is NO 'theoretical' on how high the Price can go. The Liabilities for Shorting are almost Infinite.

Also, The Federal Reserve, which regulates margin requirements can - at any time- raise the requirements and Shorts would then have to "Pony Up" or close-out the transaction by Buying-in the Stock. He thus becomes an extremely 'motivated' Buyer and is guaranteed to be 'Taken to the Cleaners.

Does the word "de-fenestration' Ring a familiar Note ? People operating with borrowed money OR borrowed Stock have jumped out of windows and committed suicide after being "Wiped Out", and not Beach Surfer Boy style, either.

Shorting is extremely, well, "Speculative". The Folks at home should be told not to attemot it - not even leaving it to Professionals" to do it for them.

Don L. Ferk ( aka VikingWarrior )

Keith Barton:

From my own SLO experience it appears it's a lot easier to pick great stocks when everything is going up.

When the market tanks, everyone scrambles for the "defensive" stock - which many times are no defense at all.

When the entire market goes south, only the short works. I managed to move up in SLO mostly because I lost less money then the other fellows, many of their portfolios go up much better than mine.

The market is both ups and downs, JAudio is dead on - you need to know how to play BOTH moves successfully if you're in this for the long term.

I sure appreciate the lesson - while still new to me, the proof of their effectiveness is unquestionable.

3 stars for you, I'll be expecting to hear them footsteps mighty soon.

dishwasher:

Good post Jonathan. Keith and I will be waiting for you to show up in the Top 5 soon :)

rfintokyo:

Im relatively new to watching the SLO and am asking how I can play along. But, I have to admit that the rules not allowing shorting have caught me back. I have friend and colleagues who do subscribe to the notion that shorting is too negative for them. Yet, in the next sentence, they know that Wall St. players like Goldman Sachs are making lots of money is market downturns. They want to do the same thing.

Well, Goldman accomplishes this by discarding all those negative connotations by shorting an obviously dire situation. They are surviving this sub-prime mess only because their trading-desk is capitalizing off of obvious opportunities in negative trends in market sectors.

I am an active trader of the Proshares funds because of their ease and selection. Many of the sector funds are weak in volume which worries me in getting a accurate fill, but thats just another sign that most people dont have an appetite for shorting. Thats good for me and Goldman Sachs I guess. Once everyone starts doing it, it will lose its effect.

To claim that shorting a stock as speculative bewilders me. I could say the same thing for going long on a stock. How do you explain stocks losing their value in the current environment when their fundamentals have nothing to do with the credit crisis. For you to long a stock with so much uncertaintity in the market is either speculative or foolish. Sentiment is the driving force in market prices now, not fundamentals.

Nice work jaudio. I wish i was in there trading (shorting) with you.

Keith Barton:

I would say the move from 157 to 40 is proof enough, just be gentle when you trod over my prone corpse.

Awesome move.

KB

don ferk:

Jon,
Keep it High-Concept, Low Risk & REAL, jon.
Don

don ferk:

Keith,
"genius' is buying a stock that goes up - 'idiocy' is buying a stock that goes down.
Remember the old nostrum - if it's going to go up - buy it.
The answer is the middle road - taking yourself "out of the genius/idiot equation"
and understanding that you Must make Best Efforts & Live wid it. Ka-Peesh?
My own Market 'theory' about this 'phenomenon' is that NO MATTER how much you STUDY or pay attention to detail - only 1 in 3 investments will truly pay off. Dump the loosers not on Mr. market's fickle WHIMS, but when you Find the Facts have changed or something bad has happened effecting the Company's prospects. Ride the Winners up - sell the losers QUICK -don't worry about LOST money, don't Hang in there HOPING to Break-Back EVEN - just Cut 'n Run. Don't wait then take BIG losses. Take your Licking & Keep on Ticking. Catch my DRIFT here. You must WORK on it, Keep Informed, and Learn the Ways O'da WURL' by accumulating and cata-'logging' experience. NSMG.
Don Ferk (aka VikingWarrior)

don ferk:

Jon,

PLEASE DON'T PUBLISH

About the Marketocracy comment about the Economy getting A Check-up :

Here's a song from Warren Zevon's ' life'll Kill You' album " = it's called " My Sh*t's F*cked Up "

(Warren Zevon)

Well, I went to the doctor
I said, "I'm feeling kind of rough"
He said, "I'll break it to you, son
Your shit's fucked up."
I said, "my shit's fucked up?"
Well, I don't see how-"
He said, "The shit that used to work-
It won't work now."

I had a dream
Ah, shucks, oh, well
Now it's all fucked up
It's shot to hell

Yeah, yeah, my shit's fucked up
It has to happen to the best of us
The rich folks suffer like the rest of us
It'll happen to you

That amazing grace
Sort of passed you by
You wake up every day
And you start to cry
Yeah, you want to die
But you just can't quit
Let me break it on down:
It's the fucked up shit

"Warren Zevon died of in-operable
lung cancer about 2 years after this album came out - his last album was 'The Wind '

Don

Post a comment

You are logged in as . Log out


Comment Preview
Preview your comment here

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to register.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1905