<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>John Czerw</title>
      <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:31:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Handicapping the Strategy Lab SLO</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It's all <strong>dishwasher</strong>, all day long.  He has the highest NAV.  80% of the top 5 favorite posts are his, and 20% of the top 50 posts are his.</p>

<p>No other top 20 NAV contender has a post in the top 50 posts.</p>

<p><strong>dishwasher is the 2/5 favorite to win and has no competition.</strong></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/11/handicapping_the_strategy_lab_3.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/11/handicapping_the_strategy_lab_3.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:31:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Top 50 Posts Inaccuracies</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed some posts that have substantially higher scores than they are credited with on the top 50 Post list.  I have watched these posts over several days to make sure I was not dealing with a timing issue.  Two such posts are:</p>

<p>#34          jslIRA2007           About my new buy HSOA  <br />
Shows 9 votes and 14 score on Top 50.  Has had 13 votes and 26 score for several days.</p>

<p>#41          jczerw                 3rd Quarter Wrap Up<br />
Shows 7 votes and 13 score on Top 50.  Has had  16 votes and 31 score for several days.</p>

<p>Just FYI.  Hopefully it will get fixed soon.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/top_50_posts_inaccuracies.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/top_50_posts_inaccuracies.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:56:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Handicapping The Strategy Lab Open</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The call:</p>

<p><strong>dishwasher (3/5)</strong> is in the lead with the <strong>#2 NAV</strong> and 9 (count em - 9) top 50 posts.  His average vote count is 29 votes per blog post.</p>

<p><strong>MagickNiner (3-1)</strong> has improved his position from last week.  His <strong>NAV is #4</strong> and he has 2 of the top 50 posts, with an average of 16 votes each.</p>

<p>j<strong>slRA2007(5-1)</strong> is still in the hunt with the <strong>#6 NAV</strong> and 1 top 50 post.</p>

<p>Finally, <strong>KC10 and pkauk (both 6-1) </strong>have<strong> NAVs # 8 and 14</strong> respectively and each have 1 top 50 post.</p>

<p>Unless dishwasher falls out of the top 20 NAVs, it would appear he will be the winner.  He also has a dedicated fan club for his posts. It would not surprise me if he held most of the top 50 post spots by the close of the competition. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/handicapping_the_strategy_lab_2.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/handicapping_the_strategy_lab_2.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:27:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Handicapping the Strategy Lab Open</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>With the leading NAV of $14.28 and holding 8 of the top 50 favorite posts, <strong>dishwasher</strong> is the prohibitive favorite to win the SLO.  In addition he holds the top 3 favorite post positions. <strong> I make him the 4/5 favorite.</strong>  </p>

<p><strong>jslRA2006</strong> and <strong>demonhawk86</strong> have NAVs of $13.46 and $13.26.  They also have posts in the top 50 favorites at spots 22 and 29. <strong> I make them 5/2 contenders.</strong></p>

<p>Finally, <strong>MagickNiner</strong> and <strong>pkauk</strong> have NAVs of $12.76 and $12.69 and top 50 posts at 38 and 29. <strong> I put them at 5-1.</strong> </p>

<p>Once again, I think the winner will come from the top 20 NAVs and be a top post vote getter.  dishwasher averages 13 votes for his top 50 posts.  Few competitors hit that average, so it appears dishwasher has a fan club that will insure his standings.  And of course, his stock picking ability seals the deal.</p>

<p>Best of luck to you all.  I'll continue this handicapping update if interest appears to warrant it.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/handicapping_the_strategy_lab_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/handicapping_the_strategy_lab_1.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:52:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Did I step on a landmine with NIHD?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If you'll recall I dumped my <strong>VLO</strong> position and put it into <strong>NIHD</strong> on 9/28.  I selected NIHD after completing a screen looking for higher margin, high growth stocks.  NIHD was the winning candidate off that entire list of about 40 stocks.  Telecom in emerging markets looked like a winner.</p>

<p>A few days after my initial purchase the stock price began to fall.  No news was reported, so I added again.  The first purchase was at 81.66, the second at 73.65.  The price continued to fall.<br />
It wasn't until Monday evening that news came that <strong>S</strong>'s CEO was resigning.  But so what?  NIHD was spun off from S in 2003.  And in the last two years NIHD has advanced 80% while S has only advanced 20%.  And they are different businesses.  So on 10/9 I added again at 69.86.  My cost basis is now 79.63.</p>

<p>The interesting thing is that the price of NIHD fell from a forward PE of 22 to 19.  S's forward PE is also 19.  But NIHD's margins and growth rate are 12 and 40.  And S's margin is less than 1 and their growth rate is low single digits.  It looks to me like there was knowledge of the CEO resignation at S, prior to the announcement, and that some institutional players took the NIHD premium off the table in advance of the news.  </p>

<p>So, did I step on a landmine?  Not really.  I certainly would have rather made my move a week later, but the fundamentals of NIHD remain strong and there isn't a strong linkage to S.  I think<br />
some institutions got nervous.  A conference call on the 25th by NIHD should help.   </p>

<p>So, I didn't step on a land mine, but I did stumble into a hole.  VLO is up 10% since I sold it, and NIHD has fallen 10% since I bought it.  The move hurt my portfolio in the short term, but I'm confident it will play out positively by the end of the competition.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/did_i_step_on_a_landmine_with.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/did_i_step_on_a_landmine_with.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:21:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Handicapping the Strategy Lab Open</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In addition to stock selecting, I also enjoy handicapping horse races.  Tonight I got out my <strong>Daily Racing Form </strong>and reviewed  the past performances of some of our most promising contestants.</p>

<p>I believe that the judges will need to pick someone who finishes in the top 20.  If they don't this will be a writing contest and not performance based.  Here are three contestants that I believe lead the pack:</p>

<p><strong>dishwaster</strong> is # 5 in total returns and off the lead by only 3%.  And what a poster!!!  In the top 50 posts he holds the #3, #12, #14, #17, #21 , #24, and #26 spots.  That's 14% of the topt 50 posts. <strong> I make dishwasher the even money favorite to win at this point.</strong></p>

<p>Behind by several lengths are <strong>gooddaze and pkauk</strong>.  They are neck and neck at $12.27 and $12.26 ( positions 9 and 10).    gooddaze  holds the #19 favorite post and pkauk's posts hold the #33 and #49 spots..  <strong>I make them both 3-1 to win at this point.</strong>   </p>

<p>No other top 20 contestants have top 50 posts, so I don't think they are in the running.</p>

<p>I'll update this analysis from time to time, when there are significant changes, if you are interested.  </p>

<p>Good luck to all. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/handicapping_the_strategy_lab.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/handicapping_the_strategy_lab.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:17:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Real Time Update</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>NIHD</strong> is down about 7% today on higher than usual volume.  I've not seen any definitive information for such a decline.  The fundamentals for the company remain the same - strong!  I am, therefore, taking the last few thousand dollars in my account and buying NIHD.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/real_time_update.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/10/real_time_update.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:40:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>3rd Quarter Wrap Up</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Whew!!  The end of the quarter left me tantalizingly close to a 10% gain.  My NAV was $10.99.<br />
Not bad for eight weeks. But, of course, there were 100+ folks who bested me.  Congrats to them!</p>

<p>This week I invested my last 5% in the <strong>QQQQ</strong> ETF.  My desire was to get some technology exposure, since this sector is doing well.  If you'll recall, I also used ETFs to gain exposure to global growth and basic materials, (<strong><strong>DBN & SLX</strong></strong>) This strategy appears to be working well.  The QQQQ advanced 1.86% since I bought it this week. The SLX is my <strong>biggest</strong> gainer at 18.45% since I bought it a while back.  And DBN is up 12.06%.</p>

<p>The interesting thing about this contest with its 5 month term,  is that it has made me much more responsive to current trends in sectors.  As I've said, I'm a bottoms up stock picker and I've got a bias towards value.  So I'm prone to buy and hold and hold and sometimes hold some more, until the rest of the world sees what I see.  (And generally, it does turn out that way.)  But, what I have been leaving on the table are some exploitable short term trends.  ETFs enable me to participate in these, when I don't have specific industry knowledge or a pick in a certain sector.</p>

<p>Also, a while back I lowered my stake in <strong>XTO</strong> and put that money to work in <strong>FDS</strong>.  It was a good move.  To date FDS has advanced 20% and XTO 13%.  So that belief that FDS had more upside than XTO <em>short term</em> was well founded.</p>

<p>Finally, this week I dumped <strong>VLO</strong>.  It was just about even and I began to doubt an upside.  It is operating at peak capacity and exploiting its ability to refine sour crude to maximize margins, but how will the company grow??  How will it recreate its fundamental unit of value creation - refineries?  Will they build in the US?  Don't think so.  Will they buy other refiners?  They went through an era of acquisitions when prices were low.  Now?  I'm not so sure there are a lot of takeover candidates.  Don't get me wrong.  They are a really strong company but I just can't articulate a growth scenario.  And their PE may move to 10 instead of 6, which would add about $40 a share, but if $85 a barrel oil isn't a catalyst, I'm not sure what would be.</p>

<p>I took my VLO stake and put it into <strong>NIHD</strong> NII Holdings, a telecom  company that serves US and Latin America.  They have 12% margins and 40% growth rates.<br />
I believe there is more upside in NIHD than VLO.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/3rd_quarter_wrap_up.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/3rd_quarter_wrap_up.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:37:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>How I follow my stocks.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There are several sources of info I use to follow the companies whose stocks I own.</p>

<p>First, I follow all news items on the internet relating relating to my companies / stocks.  I am always looking for something that challenges or confirms my assumptions.  Here are two examples of excellent analysis I recently found:</p>

<p><strong>PSYS</strong> in Business Week</p>

<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2007/pi20070924_841452.htm?campaign_id=yhoo">http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2007/pi20070924_841452.htm?campaign_id=yhoo</a></p>

<p><strong>ACAS</strong> Press Release</p>

<p><a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070925/netu122.html?.v=16">http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/070925/netu122.html?.v=16</a></p>

<p><br />
Both of these items offered confirmation of the fundamentals I believe are at work in these companies and confirm my belief that these stocks will advance.</p>

<p>Secondly, I subscribe to ZACKs Equity Research to obtain independent research.  I don't rely on ZACK's for buy/sell signals though.  I reserve that perogative.</p>

<p>Finally, when earnings season is upon us I listen to the conference calls of the companies whose stock I own. Over time you can gain the ability to read between the lines and read the tone of questions and answers.  </p>

<p>No rocket science here.  Just some great ways to consistently review the stocks in my portfolio in a consistent and systematic manner..</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/how_i_follow_my_stocks.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/how_i_follow_my_stocks.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:10:24 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A lowering Fed floats all boats.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I took a look at my top three gainers this week in an effort to see where my gains came from; The Fed or stock fundamentals.  Here are the stocks and their gains:</p>

<p><strong>GIL</strong> (Gildan Activewear)                                       +20%<br />
<strong>SLX</strong> (Market Vectors Steel ETF)                          +10%<br />
<strong>DBN</strong> (Wisdeom Tree International Materials ETF)  +  8%</p>

<p>All three stock/ETFs exceeded the S&P's 3.4% weekly gain.</p>

<p>Prior to the Fed's announcement of a .50 cut in the Fed funds rate and a similar cut in the discount rate, Gildan had gained 10% on news of their acquisition of a sock manufacturer.  On Friday GIL advanced another 10% for a weekly gain of 20%.  Clearly the rate cut didn't hurt GIL, but the driver of their stock price increase was their acquisition, it's acretive effect on earnings, and the prospect of increased growth.</p>

<p>If you'll recall, I added SLX and DBN to get some international exposure in the portfolio.  Given that growth in Europe, Asia and parts of Latin America exceed U.S. growth rates I wanted to participate in that growth.  While lower interest rates in the US won't hurt these sectors (in fact a lower dollar will help U.S. steel makers in SLX) its the global economy's growth trends that are primarily driving these stocks.</p>

<p>I tend to focus on bottoms up analysis in choosing stocks and sectors.  If all my stocks are boats in the mouth of a river, and the economy is the ocean, the Fed is the tide.  If I buy good boats, they will float in most weather and rise and fall with most tides.  But its the power and capabilities of an individual boat that will enable it to outperform in all conditions.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/a_lowering_fed_floats_all_boat.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/a_lowering_fed_floats_all_boat.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:53:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Portfolio Review / Short Positions on my Picks</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm a bottoms up stock picker.  I look for companies that can cost effectively recreate their unit of value creation.  For <strong>ACAS</strong>, it's business loans and equity positions.  For <strong>XTO</strong>, it's gas wells.  For <strong>LTFD</strong>, it's bingo hall locations.  For <strong>PSYS</strong> it's psychiatric hospitals.  For <strong>FDS</strong> it's customers for their systems.  For <strong>GIL</strong> it's wholesalers that carry their activewear.  For <strong>VLO</strong> it's additional refineries.</p>

<p>Good market or bad.  Strong economy or weak, I'd expect these companies to advance.  The market and the economy affect their stock price, but their fundamental prospects should remain the same throughout any market or economic cycles.</p>

<p>Once I commit to a stock, I tend to view dips as buying opportunities.  But I also spend a lot of time challenging my base assumptions to make sure I haven't missed something.  This is especially so if the market isn't agreeing with my assessment of a stock.  To that end I decided to review the short position ratios on my portfolio.  In essence, I'm' trying to find out where the market disagrees with me and by how much.  I also want to see how short positions may be affecting the performance of my stocks.</p>

<p><u>Short Ratio</u>         <u>Stock</u>       <u>Performance to date</u></p>

<p>6.4...........GIL .............(3.09)<br />
6.3...........PSYS ......... 3.05<br />
4.5...........ACAS.......... 2.31<br />
2.9...........FDS........... (5.79)<br />
1.8.......... XTO............. 3.33<br />
1.4.......... VLO............. 1.19<br />
0.............LTFD............. 5.95</p>

<p>The stocks where the shorts disagree with me most are GIL, PSYS, ACAS and FDS.  Four different sectors and overall the shorts appear to be winning at this point.  The average gain/loss for these four stocks is (3.5%).  And the forward PEs of these stocks run from 11 to 23.  The richest stock is FDS (the biggest loss).  The question is, does chaos in some financial markets create a need for more or less analytic software and/or systems.  I think more, although there could be some stalling of sales momentum in the short run.  But FDS has had 22% quarterly sales growth recently, so there's room to maneuver.</p>

<p>The energy sector seems like a mild short play and the stock returns are good.  So there doesn't appear to be a lot of argument between the shorts and me here.</p>

<p>Finally, the stock that very often sends people screaming when I mention it, LTFD, has zero shorts.  So the little stock that has $12M a year in revenue, is up 60% ytd, trades 20K shares a day, is up 5.95% program to date, and has no one actively betting against it.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/portfolio_review_short_positio.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/portfolio_review_short_positio.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:41:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New additions to Portfolio</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>To date my portfolio has moved between 9.70 and 10.35, basically 3% +/-.  And while my fund's beta is 87, providing a little less volatility than the market, I'm expecting more.</p>

<p>To that end, I am adding two ETFs with international focus.  My plan is to capture some of the global growth that is occuring.  The first ETF is <strong><em>SLX</em></strong>.  It invests in Steel companies, including ADRs of foreign companies.  The second ETF is <strong><em>DBN</em></strong>.  It invests in basic materials companies that operate outside the US.</p>

<p>At this point I am 95% invested.  I'll hold the final 5% in case some buying opportunities develop. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/new_additions_to_portfolio.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/new_additions_to_portfolio.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:51:25 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Potentially Valuable Research</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes a very detailed oriented researcher on a public website can produce valuable information.  Please read the attached re: <strong>LTFD</strong>.  I found it on the Yahoo Bulletin Board.</p>

<p> <strong>Florida - Part 2   (1 Rating)       3-Sep-07 09:49 am    <br />
Caution: They have formed corporations before & have never used them. There is no guarantee this one will bear fruit but it makes perfect sense. Jeff has been hinting about Florida forever and Pensacola is about 60 miles from Mobile, so it's basically in the Alabama region.</strong></p>

<p>Notice the date below - Florida is coming & it's coming soon, IMO:</p>

<p>Florida Profit Corporation<br />
PENSACOLA ONE, INC.<br />
Filing Information<br />
Document Number P07000095184<br />
FEI Number NONE<br />
<strong>Date Filed 08/23/2007</strong><br />
State FL<br />
Status ACTIVE</p>

<p>Principal Address<br />
2501 NORTH LAMAR BOULEVARD<br />
AUSTIN TX 78705<br />
Mailing Address<br />
2501 NORTH LAMAR BOULEVARD<br />
AUSTIN TX 78705<br />
Registered Agent Name & Address<br />
INCORPORATING SERVICES, LTD.<br />
1540 GLENWAY DRIVE<br />
TALLAHASSEE FL 32301 US<br />
Officer/Director Detail<br />
Name & Address<br />
Title PT<br />
ZINN, TROY D<br />
2501 NORTH LAMAR BOULEVARD<br />
AUSTIN TX 78705<br />
Title VPS<br />
CHILINSKI, RICHARD<br />
2501 NORTH LAMAR BOULEVARD<br />
AUSTIN TX 78705<br />
Title D<br />
MINCH, JEFFREY L<br />
2501 NORTH LAMAR BOULEVARD<br />
AUSTIN TX 78705<br />
Annual Reports<br />
No Annual Reports Filed<br />
Document Images<br />
08/23/2007 -- Domestic Profit </p>

<p><br />
If LTFD is entering its long awaited growth phase, with the assistance of their institutional investor, additional movement in the stock could be forthcoming.  The recent purchase of two corporations in TX with bingo licenses, the purchase of 15% of the company by the institutional investor, and now the creation of this Florida subsidiary, do auger well.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/potentially_valuable_research.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/09/potentially_valuable_research.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:56:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>VLO uptick</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, <strong>VLO</strong> advanced to greater than 10% of my portfolio, putting it out of compliance, so I sold it back down to 9%.</p>

<p>The<strong> XTO / FDS</strong> allocation shift seems to have been a good move.  XTO which was reduced to 9% ,has fallen 1.73%, while FDS, which was increased to 15%, has advanced 3.43%.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/08/vlo_uptick.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/08/vlo_uptick.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:08:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Allocation Adjustments</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>On Friday I made a change to two of my stock allocations, decreasing <strong>XTO </strong>to 9% of my holdings, and increasing <strong>FDS</strong> to 15% of my holdings.  Reason?  While XTO is an excellent company and stock, the current weakness in the natural gas markets is lessening its chances of appreciation within the timeframe of this competition.  FDS, I believe, has been beaten down because its customers are financial institutions, and it appears to be another case of the baby out with the bath water.</p>

<p>Bottom line, there's more short term upside in FDS than XTO.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/08/allocation_adjustments_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/jczerw/2007/08/allocation_adjustments_1.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:59:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
