Register
Hello, !
Edit Profile | Logout

November 2008 Archives

Time To Grin And "Bear" It

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

Here's what's on my radar today as I try to get a bead on the market.

Since the lows on October 10th, the S&P 500 has rallied nearly 20%, from 839 to yesterday's high of 1007. We had a big drop, but that's a big move! There are 3 directions to go from here.

1. Up.
2. Down.
3. Sideways.

No need to thank me for the punchy analysis. If I had to choose 1 of the 3 options, I would choose either Down or Sideways. Down makes sense because all year, selling these rallies has been the profitable decision. It's a bear market, and this is how bear markets work. Sideways is possible, but even then we're talking about a trading range of some kind that we seem to be near the top of. On October 13th we hit 1006 and went back down. Yesterday we hit 1007 and are trading down. That would be the definition of resistance.

spresist.png

So, it seems reasonable to grin and "bear" it on the short side. I've started positions in the Ultrashort Nasdaq (QID) and Ultrashort Real Estate (SRS), with an eye to S&P 1010 as a level where I'd admit defeat and realize Up was the right answer. Why SRS and QID? SRS has been "the wettest paper sack" in Gartman's lingo, and QID is a hopeful hedge to my long position in Activision (ATVI).

Speaking of ATVI, I have half my position left from the other day, and I've decided to hold it through the earnings report tonight. If this were Prime Minister's Questions, I'd be hearing groans from the other side of the aisle right about now. "Would the Prime Minister please enlighten us as to why he's holding Activision through earnings in a bear market, especially when Electronic Arts bit the dust last week, THQ is shutting down studios, and priests have been hired by malls to perform last rites on consumers? What kind of wanker does the right honorable gentleman think he is?"

Well, first of all, I'm not a Prime Minister. Second of all, this is a bet that Activision is executing better than its competitors. Also, since ERTS reported earnings, ATVI has been falling rather precipitously and so much of the risk might be priced into the stock. Believe me, I'm not all that comfortable with it myself, especially as the market gets crushed. I'd better pay attention--be right back!

4:12 pm: ATVI and THQI report earnings

The market got very ugly in a hurry. You'll probably hear quite a bit about the market reacting to the election, but I usually dismiss that sort of cause-effect analysis. There could be any number of causes and I don't see how pointing out the obvious (there was an election) helps us understand why the market did what it did. Just thought I'd throw that out there.

Back to Activision. ATVI's report was quite nice. I'll write more on it after looking over the earnings call transcript. For now, here are a couple statements from CEO Bobby Kotick (full article here). He's showing a lot of confidence in the company, and we didn't hear anything like this from ERTS CEO John Riccitello.

--Activision Blizzard's financial results were higher than the outlook we provided on our last earnings call, both on a GAAP and non-GAAP basis. Our performance was driven by continued strong worldwide sales...


--We are excited about our holiday releases, which are all based on proven franchises, and will deliver our entire slate on schedule with strong product quality on our key titles.

--As a result of our strong momentum through the first 9 months of the year and our solid holiday slate, we are reaffirming our full year non-GAAP outlook....

--We also announced a $1 billion share repurchase program which illustrates our confidence in the long-term growth of the company....

That's what I like to hear. Contrast this with THQ, which also reported today.

--On a non-GAAP basis, the company reported a fiscal 2009 second quarter net loss of $30.4 million, or $0.46 per share. This was below the company's previous guidance of a loss of $0.35 to $0.39 per share....


--The company's expectations for a more cautious retail environment and continued softness in sales of kids games accounted for approximately $70 million in lower forecasted net sales....

Not good. I used to like THQ, but now I wonder if they will survive. Perhaps they will get bought, but that was a rumor many, many points ago.

Disclosures: Long ATVI, SRS, QID. No position in THQI.

Simultaneously posted on my personal blog: www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com

Friday Video Game Update: Can Gamestop Avoid The Grinch?

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

It's Friday, and that means time for the Friday Video Game Update. This week I'll respond to a reader's question.

GAMESTOP: A GOOD BUY INTO EARNINGS?

A reader left the following comment:

I can't help but think that with ATVI earnings, ERTS earnings (past & future revenue good, profit not), and Ubisoft's (UBI.PA) beat & raise that GME is positioned well to report good earnings and guide in-line. Especially with what they offer the customer in the current economy, trade-in values as well as less expensive used games. Do you own or watch GME?

I do own a small position in Gamestop, and have been wondering what to do with it before they report earnings on November 20th. Like most stocks, GME has suffered this year. A troubling sign is that GME has underperformed the retail sector (as represented by the Retail Holders ETF--RTH), but RTH is 20% Wal-mart, so I wouldn't worry about that so much. (wow, that's an ugly decline!)

gme1yrbby.png

More troubling is that GME has recently underperformed a competitor like Best Buy (BBY), despite (I would argue) better fundamentals, such as stronger revenue growth and lower debt. An especially good fundamental sign to me is that Gamestop was able to buy a French game retailer, Micromania, showing off a strong cash position and a strategy for future growth. Part of the underperformance in the stock might be due to the fact that GME has outperformed for so long and it had to do some catching up on the downside (click here for a 5-year chart if you're interested). Here's the competitor snapshot from Yahoo!

compete.PNG

The P/E ratio, PEG ratio, and Price to Sales ratio (P/S) all look decent to me, but the problem recently has been that analyst earnings estimates are still too high across the board. Whether this is true for GME remains to be seen. Forbes points out that although GME has been beat estimates the past 4 quarters, that could set the stock up for a fall.

Forbes: Heading into the earnings report, Wall Street is extremely optimistic when it comes to the retailer. Zacks reports that all 12 of the analysts following the firm rate it a "buy" or better, leaving ample room for downgrades should the company post less than stellar results.

I personally think the earnings will be fine, and downgrades don't worry me so much because the stock has been sold off aggressively already (-60% this year). I'm not sure much can be gleaned from the game publishers' earnings--ATVI, Ubisoft, and Nintendo were fine, but THQI and ERTS were not good at all. It's the outlook that will really matter. If guidance is above estimates, the stock could see a pop, but if guidance is cautious, the response will be anyone's guess. Everyone expects a Grinch-like recession for the holidays, so we need to keep in mind that most retailers are being shunned by the Street.

As for me, I think GME is a good value (depending on your time horizon) in the low to mid 20s. But then again, I thought that in the low to mid 30s! GME made a new 52-week low just yesterday at 23.53. Going forward I'll be looking at how GME (and the overall market) acts leading up to the report. A big run up would beg traders to "sell the news," while a further sell off would set the stage for a rally. It's a tough call, which may argue for staying on the sidelines. I'll probably keep my small position and only trade around it when the risk/reward is particularly appetizing. For now, that means buying for a trade near 24 and selling near 30.

Thanks for the comment and look for another Video Game Update next Friday! If you missed last week's call to buy Activision, check it out.

Disclosure: Long GME, ATVI, NTDOY
Simultaneously posted on my personal site, www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com

Context Check: Technical Picture Mixed, Macro Picture Still Bearish

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

THE TECHNICAL PICTURE: MIXED

Last Wednesday, I wrote that it was time to Grin And "Bear" It as I expected a downside move after the S&P 500 hit its head on resistance around 1000. With the following chart, I mused about a downside slide to support around 900 (the October 10th closing low) or 839 (the same's intraday low).

spresist.png

The downside slide took place, with alarming speed. In the worst 2-day move since the 1987 crash, the S&P 500 fell more than 10% and hit support at 900 (899.73, to be exact). I can't take credit for any predictive ability, this rudimentary technical analysis doesn't always work but it provides a context for trading. Buying a short ETF around 1000 and covering around 900 was a sensible bet.

Looking again at the chart, what do we see? We see a possible "reverse head and shoulders" forming (click here for the definition from Investopedia). That would be bullish. However, if the "right shoulder" at 900 doesn't hold, we'd likely get a test of the next support level at 840.

sp900.png

Again, this is context and it's a hard call which way it will go until it happens. Technical analysis paints the lines on the playing field but doesn't play the game. In my view, giving up today's gap up is a bad sign and I'm anticipating a move lower with some of the short ETFs. This is a bear market, so my benefit of the doubt goes with the bears and I'm playing on their team for now. You can play the current context whichever way you prefer as long as you have an exit strategy to protect against big losses.

THE MACRO PICTURE: STILL BEARISH

Here's why I still carry a bearish bent:

--The dollar is still going up while commodities are going down. This is a deflationary move and is bearish for stocks. I've started a small position in UUP (Bullish Dollar ETF) because I think this will continue. For years the dollar went down compared to many other currencies. As other countries lower interest rates to try to stimulate growth (something the US has already done, almost to zero), their currencies will lose strength.

--Countries are racing to Zero on interest rates. On a related note, I recommend the following article from Bloomberg: Zero Rate World May Lie Ahead as King, Trichet Cut. Usually rate cuts are cheered by markets as easy money increases risk taking. But what happens when it doesn't work? You can give money to institutions, but you can make them lend or spend, especially when they need to deleverage (reduce debt). Are we looking at the Japanese situation worldwide?

--Unemployment is going higher and earnings are going lower. The unemployment issue seems obvious to most observers and is obviously bad for the economy. Corporate earnings are also going lower, and analyst estimates are still too high. Therefore, stocks are not as cheap as they seem, because the "E" in P/E is still too high. More downgrades are on the way (though hopefully not as bad as GM today, hit with a price target of zero).

--The Financial and Real Estate sectors are especially weak. With all the news about the election and General Motors, financial and real estate stocks have been quietly deteriorating. Goldman Sachs (GS) is acting terribly, and the strongest ticks on my screen are the Ultrashort ETFs of these sectors (SKF and SRS). Is another shoe about to drop, like commercial real estate, insurers, or something we're not even aware of?

--I had a rough weekend in fantasy football. This is probably not a good reason to be bearish on the stock market, but life is complex and a bearish mood can have many causes. If Frank Gore has a big game on Monday Night Football, I might be in a more bullish mood tomorrow!

Disclosure: Long SDS, TWM, SRS, SKF, UUP
Find more at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com.

Low And (Be)Hold, It's A Bear Market Rally

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

Traders were wondering if the October 10th low would hold in the S&P 500, and today they got their answer, at least for the short term. The result was a huge rally today and an opportunity to go long with a clear risk / reward setup. Please see my previous post for a Context Check, where I mused over whether or not the lows would hold and explained why I carried a bearish bent. The context chart:

The 900 level did not hold, and as expected we quickly fell to 839, which was the intraday low from October 10th. You can see from today's daily chart how the decline sped up when the lows were temporarily broken. Even if you don't "believe in" technical analysis, this is how support levels work. They act as decision points for the market. Once broken, stops are triggered and many traders sell to fight another day. The daily chart today shows the break of 839, and you can see the immediate and dramatic slide after support was broken.

However, even if you do "believe in" technical analysis, today showed that it's as much art as science. Yes, the lows were broken, some stops were triggered, and there was a quick drop. However, the bears ran out of steam. The quick move back up above 839 was a very bullish sign.

So how did I trade this? I had some Ultrashort ETFs (SDS, SKF, TWM) that I bought earlier this week in anticipation of a retest of the lows. They worked well, but when we bounced back above 839 today, it was time to take the gains. The bounce also provided a clear risk / reward setup on the long side. I played on the side of traders who saw it as a successful retest, and I went long with a combination of the strongest and weakest sectors (some call this a "barbell" strategy).

One of the strongest sectors, in my view, is biotech. Amgen (AMGN), for example, was up all day and has shown good relative strength over the past couple weeks compared to the overall market. See the strong chart (AMGN in red, S&P 500 in blue):

Just as quality sectors with good relative strength tend to bounce well in a bear market rally (because people want to own them), weak sectors also tend to bounce rather violently (because shorts cover and people want to bottom fish). Two of the weakest sectors are energy and financials, so I bought the Ultralong ETFs (DIG and UYG). I don't plan on holding them long because they really are terrible sectors, but I will play the bounce with trailing stops. Here's the weak and ugly chart (S&P 500 in green, DIG blue and UYG red):

This type of trading is not for everyone. It requires time to watch the ticks and agility to act quickly. But right now, the only way to make sense of these big market moves is by understanding the technical context and using it to your advantage to take calculated risks. Even though I'm playing this rally, make no mistake: this is still a bear market until proven otherwise, and I will not hesitate to go short again when the risk / reward is in my favor.

Two of Dennis Gartman's rules are especially applicable today:

--Trade like a mercenary guerrilla. We must fight on the winning side and be willing to change sides readily when one side has gained the upper hand.

--To trade successfully, think like a fundamentalist; trade like a technician.

Disclosure: Long DIG, UYG, AMGN.
See more at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com

Friday Video Game Update: Will THQ Survive?

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

Sales of video game software in October were strong, rising 35% year over year compared to expectations of 20-25%. But hold on before you run out and buy a basket of video game stocks, because there are definite winners and losers.

I won't recap the October number, you can read about it here. Instead, I'd like to focus on THQ (THQI) as a cautionary tale. THQ came into the current console cycle (meaning: the release of the Xbox 360, Playstation 3, and Nintendo Wii) in a strong position. The company was growing, and management had a plan to increase their intellectual property. As opposed to licensed games where THQ pays a fee for using certain characters or stories (i.e. to Disney/Pixar, for making a game based on the movie Cars), intellectual property would be fully owned by the company, resulting in higher profit margins. Think Take-Two (TTWO) and Grand Theft Auto.

Additionally, as it became clear the Wii was going to be the big console winner, some speculated that THQ would benefit due to its past success on Nintendo (NTDOY) platforms and a history of family-friendly games. THQ management believed this themselves. Everything was lining up well for THQ. You can read about their plans and their optimism in old conference call transcrips on Seeking Alpha. Here are some highlights from CEO Brian Ferrill on the August 2007 call:

On today's call, I would like to share with you our THQ is continuing to execute on our strategies to drive revenue and margin growth. Specifically, we plan to, one, grow annual revenues from our big family and casual franchises. Two, sequel and extend our growing portfolio of owned intellectual properties. Three, introduce one to three new intellectual properties each year that have long-term franchise potential....

At these years E3, it was clear that Nintendo's new platforms are truly expanding the markets for video games and we are excited to build upon our heritage as the leading independent publisher on Nintendo's hardware....

We plan to ship more than 1 million units each of five owned properties, Stuntman, Juiced, Frontlines, MX vs. ATV and Destroy All Humans!

But, in the end, it all comes down to executing on good, popular games. By THQ's own admission, titles like Stuntman and Juiced were simply not competitive. Now I wonder if THQ can survive to see the next cycle. Activision (ATVI) has solidified its position by combining with Blizzard and a gazillion World of Warcraft addicts. Electronic Arts (ERTS) has been struggling, but the sports games keep the cash flowing. Some say Take-Two is a one-hit wonder, but it's a heckuva hit (Grand Theft Auto) and they have arguably some of the best creative talent in the business (Bioshock was very impressive). THQ, in my opinion, doesn't come close with its slate of games.


My friend The Long/Short Trader is more optimistic on THQ (after being pessimistic in 2007), based on the Ultimate Fighting Championship license and a possible takeover bid. While it wouldn't surprise me if THQ got snapped up by Disney or Electronic Arts, I'm beginning to wonder if that isn't the only way THQ can make it. When the next console cycle begins, video game publishers will need to ramp up spending to develop the next generation of games. Even though THQ currently has no debt, they are not expected to make a profit in FY09. They are struggling just when the industry should be near peak profitability for the cycle.

So, the best option for THQ, in my opinion, is to shop themselves to a bigger player. They may survive as an independent company, but they are on the road to being a second-rate publisher. Indeed, the stock shows that they look less like strong and healthy Activision and more like totally dysfunctional Midway (MWY). Ouch. (Click on the chart to enlarge, but beware--it's ugly.)

Disclosure: Long ATVI, TTWO, NTDOY
See more at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com

Buy And Hold: Beware The Devil You Don't Know

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

I fully intended to write an article bashing the buy and hold strategy, and indeed part of me still wants to write such an article. There is much to bash. I even had a title prepared: Buy and Hold Didn't Die, It Never Really Lived. (Cue the YouTube video of Braveheart)

But alas, it is difficult to confirm the death of buy and hold investing when so few of its defenders actually mean the same thing when they defend it. There are several buy and holds. Here are some samples:

  • An article found on InvestorPlace suggests that underweighting certain sectors and changing 25% of the stocks in one's portfolio each year is a version of buy and hold investing. (Is that really holding?)

  • An article from Motley Fool says the goal is to find a stock that you "never, ever" need to sell. (How does one make money with that strategy?)

  • An article found on Seeking Alpha talks about understanding secular and cyclical bull and bear markets. (Why? To better time the market?)

  • Finally, an article from Forbes online drops the names of heavy hitters like Grantham, Siegel, Malkiel, Bogle, and--cue music--Buffett to support sticking with buy and hold. (But don't all those guys have different strategies?)
I'm not sure which buy and hold strategy to bash. But as I was doing some research, I realized it's not so much a specific strategy that bothers me, it's the conventional wisdom that bothers me. Conventional wisdom is dangerous because it is what the masses take for granted, it is the lowest common denominator of understanding. In the form of conventional wisdom, the buy and hold strategy has become a soothing crutch for the average investor, a call to inaction, a warning against straying from the path of pseudo-scientific statistical outcomes.

Don't try to time the market, it can't be done. It's better to do nothing! Just buy and hold. Everything will be fine in the long run. Assume 8% annual returns and plug it into the retirement calculator. Above all, never panic. Do not to interrupt the wealth machine with your simple emotions.
When I think of buy and hold as conventional wisdom, I think of my mother. Like most people, what she knows about investing comes from pamphlets received from kind and well-meaning financial planners. If I were to ask her what buy and hold means, she would probably say that it means you are supposed to keep putting money into stocks (or, more likely, mutual funds) and hold onto them because over the long term, the stock market always goes up...eventually.


You may say this is a caricature of buy and hold, but this is how conventional wisdom works. When the market goes down, casual investors consider it outside the norm and become confused, nervous, or even angry and helpless (What should I do? I can't sell, can I?). A few might become overconfident and throw good money after bad. They trust the strategy and its familiar simplicity, and they are not often presented with alternatives. Worst of all, they are not taught risk management. Why have a stop-loss when the market always comes back?

When buy and holders speak of risk, they are usually not referring to risk at all. They speak of missed opportunities. They trot out charts and studies that show (as always, over the long term) the dangers of not being in stocks, with relative performance (how one does compared with the S&P 500) as the measure of success. However, in this day and age when savings and retirement funds are invested in the markets, when the lines between saving and investing have been blurred, shouldn't people be aware that there have been long periods of time where markets go down or sideways? Shouldn't people be shown a chart of Japan's Nikkei 225 from November 1989 to today?


That should make you think. It's Japan, not Zimbabwe. Now of course it is absurd to say that the past returns of the Nikkei over a certain period of time are indicative of future results (disregarding the similar storyline of a real estate bubble, extremely low interest rates, and a deflationary environment). But it is just as absurd to use buying Microsoft in the 80s as an example of a buy and hold strategy. The truth is that past returns are not indicative of future results, it's more than a disclaimer, and no amount of academic studies referencing the market's history can change that. We can use history as a guide, but that's not risk management. Risk management isn't planning for the norm, it's protecting yourself against the extreme or unusual (read some Nassim Taleb, please).

You may now be thinking that I've decided to just bash buy and hold after all. Not so. (Okay, I did get some shots in.) I respect that some investors, using their own version of a buy and hold strategy, have been quite successful. But some have been unsuccessful, perhaps by picking the wrong stocks and holding them to near zero (yes, smart people have done this). In the same way, there are successful and unsuccessful short term traders who attempt to time the market and use a variety of methods.

My point is not that one method of investing is better than any other. I have my preference, which fits my personality, risk tolerance, time horizon, and skill set. My point is that buy and hold has become conventional wisdom as the "right" approach for the casual investor, whereas day trading has become synonymous with risky behavior. The truth is that while both approaches have risks, only one of the approaches readily acknowledges that risk. So which is more dangerous--the devil you know, or the devil you are led to believe does not exist?

[Simultaneously posted on my personal blog at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com]

Context Check: Watching The Trading Range, Managing Risk

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

The market appears to be holding the lows (3:55 p.m. update: I guess not!), but there's certainly not much confidence out there.

Most traders I follow are expecting a rally of some kind. Selling seems to be reaching the exhaustion point, and the technical setup (holding the lows) is favorable. The closing low this year was 848.92, and the intraday low was 818.69. Here's the chart of the S&P 500. Note the fairly obvious trading range.

Being near the bottom of the range is not pleasant, and although a bounce would make sense, I can't say anything is looking very good right now. Therefore, it's important to plan for both scenarios. If we bounce, I will hold my current longs and probably add to them. If we break the lows, I will raise cash and live to fight another day.

The worst looking indicators in my book, other than the car crash known as the auto industry, are the real estate and financial sectors. Unlike the overall market, they are at new lows. The Ultrashort ETFs (SRS and SKF) continue to work, but I am out of them for now (regrettably).

The only relative strength on my screen is in large cap biotech. I am long Celgene (CELG) and Amgen (AMGN). My other longs, in the video game sector and smaller biotech, are acting terribly and the price action must be respected. I have no position in Electronic Arts (ERTS), but I mentioned that I'd be interested under $20. I didn't buy any, but I notice today that it has a 17-handle. Yuck! This is why stops are important, and one should have an exit strategy for every trade.

Along those lines, I received a very thoughtful comment regarding a post from the beginning of June where I wrote about trying to use predetermined buy points on certain stocks for a trade. Obviously, most of those stocks are much lower now than they were then, and I don't use that strategy with any regularity. The commenter, who is just now reading that post for some reason, ridiculed the Gartman trading rules and suggested I "go down to the circus and ask the other clowns" what stocks to buy. Insightful.

This goes to the point I was making in Buy And Hold: Beware The Devil You Don't Know. There are many viable trading strategies out there, and buy and hold (in some version) is one of them. My problem with it in its conventional wisdom form is that it's sold as a relatively safe strategy. In my view, the only safe strategy is one that includes selling as part of the plan. Regarding any previous trade idea espoused on this blog, none of them should be regarded as ideas for anyone other than me, and even for me they are not ideas for the long haul with no exit strategy. I know I will be wrong sometimes, perhaps frequently, and that is why I believe so strongly in risk management. If there's one think this market has taught us, it's that we ignore risk management at our own peril.

Update--Managing Risk: 3:55 p.m. We will close below the lows, and it again calls into question how low the "lows" can go. Therefore, I'm trimming nearly all my positions and living to fight another day. Risk management means sometimes you take a small loss to avoid an even bigger loss. Good luck out there!

Disclosure: Long Celgene (CELG). [sold my AMGN for a small loss]
Posted simultaneously on my personal blog, www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com

Emotions In Trading: Is Panic Underrated?

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

Earlier this week, I noted the trading range in the S&P 500 (approximately the low to mid 800s up to 1000). The risk / reward favored a bounce from the bottom of the range, especially after last Thursday's huge reversal up from the lows. However, I also noted that if we broke the lows, there could be another painful leg down.

That painful leg started on Wednesday when the lows were broken and continued Thursday. Here's a chart showing the break--remember, past support (the red line) now becomes future resistance.



I did a lot of selling on Wednesday as the break began. Sure, that was only a couple days ago, but in percentage terms it's been a huge move. Around 10% since Wednesday in the averages (and worse for many individual stocks, right Citigroup?).



One might say selling was a bad move, that I'm selling near the lows. That view may turn out to be correct--I've certainly been wrong many times and will be wrong many times more. But the same argument against selling could have been made (and in fact was made) about the "lows" in March, July, and October. We are lower now than at all those previous lows. Discipline in this market has saved me from huge losses. Eventually, one of the short term lows will turn out to be THE low, but the only way to have capital left to take advantage of THE low is to protect capital in the meantime, which brings us back to discipline and risk management.

Psychologically, I find it interesting that when it comes to the markets, people are advised to be completely unemotional. While I agree that emotions can cloud judgment, I would also note that if we are aware of our emotions they can clue us in to important actions. In other areas of life, the emotion of fear often spurs prudent action. When we are afraid for our safety, we seek protection.


In early October I told my wife I was really worried about the market, that I had a gut feeling that something was seriously wrong. She took notice because I rarely express fear like that, I'm usually quite happy-go-lucky (despite the bearishness on this blog). Well, the market crashed the following week, and although I was heavy in cash I was not completely out as I should have been. I rationalized, I listened to the "don't panic" conventional wisdom, and ignored my fears. I'm NOT saying we should be quick to panic, but I am saying that panic can be underrated. Sometimes we should listen to our emotions and try to evaluate them rather than dismiss them out of hand. They are there for a reason.

Here's a 1-year chart of various good times to panic.


Notice how small the early drops look compared to the more recent drops. But I do remember January being quite scary as volatility started to ramp. I also remember the conventional wisdom crowd in January advising everyone not to panic. I remember doing a lot of selling in January. It felt terrible and I felt like a foolish chicken. I don't feel so foolish anymore.


Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to endorse panic as a strategy for making money. It isn't. If anything it's a last gasp at self-protection. I also don't mean to make light of panic selling because I know people have lost a lot in this market, and it feels terrible. What I do mean to do is spur you, reader, to think about your emotions in trading. Emotions can be dismissed, managed, or acted upon, but the point is that we all have them and we all need to learn what to do with them.

Managing Risks For Successful Day Trading

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

With market volatility so high, there are some excellent day trading opportunities out there if you know how to manage your risk. Many consider day trading quite risky, and indeed it can be. However, I would argue (and I have argued) that buy and hold investing can be just as risky, it's just not advertised as such.

So how do we manage risks while day trading? There are several ways, but today I'd like to highlight the basic strategy of using buy and sell stops.

1. Use a buy stop to determine a good entry point.

Many people are familiar with sell stops, but not as many people use buy stops. The concept is simple. You set your buy stop at a certain percentage, certain dollar amount, or certain technical level above the current price. So if SRS (Ultrashort Real Estate) is currently trading at 130, a buy stop could be placed 1% above at 131.30, for example. If SRS trades up to 131.30, you will buy the stock at that price. If SRS never gets there, you will not buy it and you should be happy because that means the stock is either moving sideways or down, which would not be a profitable day trade.

It may seem counterintuitive to want to buy a stock at a higher price, but day trading is all about catching upward price movement. This is not an excercise in fundamental analysis where you are buying the stock at an appropriate value and giving it time to realize that value. In day trading, you simply want to buy a change in the stock price, and it doesn't matter if the change is for legitimate reasons or daily noise. With a buy stop, you are betting that the price will continue to move up as it triggers your stop. If you buy as the stock is moving downward, chances are high that you will immediately be underwater on your day trade. That's not good.

Personally, I like to use trailing buy stops in order to catch reversals in price movement. Let's say SRS, again, is trading at 130. If I set a trailing buy stop at 1%, my initial buy point will be 131.30. If SRS goes down, my buy stop will trail the price downward, and maintain a distance of 1%. The benefit here is that as SRS continues to get cheaper, my buy point continues to get more attractive. Once SRS turns around and starts moving up, I will buy that upward price action. Instead of buying a hard stop at 131.30, I buy a trailing stop in this example at 127.26--a significant difference in price. Here's how it looks on the chart (click on chart to enlarge).

2. Use a sell stop to cut losses or lock in profits

So I own SRS at 127.26. The key to day trading after buying a stock is to prevent losses and lock in a gain. The best way to do this is to set a sell stop. Without sell stops, day trading can be very risky because you could be down several percent in a flash. Initially, I like to set a sell stop either at the day's purchase price or at a minimal loss, like 1-2%. If I set the stop at 127.26, I will likely get stopped out quickly unless I caught the move just right. Therefore, I often give my trade a little room to work, but no more than 2%.

If the trade is working and I'm up 1-2%, I start thinking of how to preserve the gains. The first step is to never let a winning trade turn into a losing trade. In our example, I'd set my stop at 127.26. The worst case scenario at this point is to finish the trade flat. After that I might set a hard stop after the stock has gone up and I see some support on the chart, around 130.

Again, trailing stops can be very useful. After I see that my stop at 130 has held and SRS is continuing to move up, I can set a trailing stop of 1% to try to maximize gains. In our example, SRS makes it to 140 and my stop trails it to 138.60. When SRS pulls back, the trailing stop is triggered for a very nice gain. I might have made more if it goes higher, but I can rest easy knowing it was a successful day trade (click on chart to enlarge).

That's an example of a big winner (almost 9%), but even gains of 1% can be worthwhile over time, as long as you don't lose more than 1% on any given trade. Let's say you start with $10,000 and you trade the full amount each day for 20 days. If you lose 1% 5 times (25% of your trades), are flat 5 times (25% of the trades), and gain 1% 10 times (50% of trades), you will probably end up with around $10,500 when it's all said and done, a gain of 5%. Of course it depends on when you make your gains and when you make your losses, but my calculations are based on a random order of gains and losses. The point is that sometimes you will win and sometimes you will lose, but you only need to win half the time for some nice gains. 5% is not bad at all for a month's worth of trading.

Here's the key. Some days you might catch a big move and make much more than 1%. Those will be great days and they can make your month or your year. But you should never lose more than 1-2% on a single day trade. Not only will a big loss be difficult to make up, it can be psychologically and emotionally damaging, and will affect your trading negatively. Using stops takes the emotion out of trading. You will undoubtedly get stopped out plenty of times, and perhaps become frustrated by missed opportunities. But opportunities are made up easier than losses, and risk management is all about avoiding disaster.

Day trading is not for everyone--it's time consuming, takes planning, and you need to be able to focus on the market during trading hours. Also, many brokers have rules that limit day trading. Unless you have $25,000 in your account, you may be restricted to 3 day trades in a 5 day period, and if you exceed 3 you may face restrictions. That said, I think day trading in a volatile environment can be a low risk endeavor as long as you stick to your stops. As you close out trades each day, you will never wake up and helplessly see your stock gapping down 10%. In my day trading account, I have missed the recent 15% or so up move in the S&P 500, but I also missed the 25% decline since October 1st. In day trading, I'm not a slave to relative returns, I can pick my spots and try to make money whether the overall market is going up or down. In my opinion, this is an important skill in a difficult market.

[Read more on my personal blog at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com]

Turkey With A Side Of Bull For Thanksgiving

Rating: not yet rated    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

Pundits have been calling for a market bottom for months and this time they may be right. I do not take this to mean that the pundits are now ahead of the curve, I'm just acknowledging that even a blind pig finds a truffle occasionally.

More importantly, some astute market watchers that I follow have also become more constructive of late. They all come from different perspectives and use different strategies, but they are folks I respect and I encourage you to read for yourself: Todd Harrison, Jeff Saut, Carter Worth, and Jeff Cooper. No one is necessarily saying that we've seen THE bottom, but it very well could be A bottom for 2008.

As for me, I am warming to this view. The most compelling argument to me, aside from smart folks looking to buy, is that there will be performance chasing into year end. As institutions (especially long-only mutual funds) scramble to put the best spin on a very bad year, they will not want to be left behind if the market catches a bid. On the short side, sellers are seeing fewer opportunities and may decide their fun is done for a while. Let's look at the S&P 500 for some context (click chart to enlarge).

As you can see, the past 3 months have been terrible, and the S&P is down a cool 30% over that timeframe. In order to make up for a 30% decline, the S&P will need to go up around 43%. I doubt we'll see that this year or next. However, I think a move to the 50-day moving average (around 990--green line above) is likely. The 200-day (around 1240--red line above) is what many market watchers use to determine a "healthy demand" for stocks, but I don't think we'll make it there. In fact, I would be a seller again around the 50-day. In the meantime, a move from 860 to 990 would be nothing to sneeze at. That'd be another 15% for the S&P, and some stocks would benefit even more. Although I've been bearish for quite a while, there just might be some Bull to go with my Thanksgiving Turkey.

As I've said for a while now, I like biotech to outperform in this environment because it has little or no exposure to housing prices, the consumer, or credit issues. Health care in general could get some sort of boost from the new administration, but I would not invest on that basis. I've mentioned Amgen (AMGN), Celgene (CELG), Isis (ISIS), and Illumina (ILMN) many times, but another stock I've been watching but until now never pulled the trigger on is Emergent BioSolutions (EBS). Jim Van Meerten mentioned this stock on his blog on InvestorPlace. I don't pretend to know the ins and outs of this company, but I will show you the prettiest chart I've seen all year (click on chart to enlarge).

That, my friends, is a thing of beauty. EBS consistently bounces off its 50-day, and has not come close to its 200-day. You don't need to be a technical trader to see that there has been consistent demand for this stock. I started EBS with a partial position, and will look to add on a pullback. As with all my current picks, I will be placing stops for protection. Also, if and when the S&P gets close to 990, I will look to take profits.

Enjoy your Turkey!

Posted on my personal blog at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com. Disclosure: Long EBS, CELG, AMGN, ISIS, ILMN.