<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Stock Surfer</title>
      <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:24:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>EA Gets Sacked; Will Disney Get The Cheese?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Electronic Arts (ERTS) continues to disappoint, this time <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/newsanalysis/techsoftware/10452437.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">giving a big fat profit warning</a> for 2009. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">A</span><a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/10/friday-video-game-update-buying.html">s I've written before,</a> they have no one to blame but themselves.  There are winners and losers in every video game cycle, and this time EA is a loser.  The 3-month chart tells the story (click chart to enlarge):</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SUBEG9G8hmI/AAAAAAAABgk/_uuOJoIry1Y/s1600-h/5vids.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SUBEG9G8hmI/AAAAAAAABgk/_uuOJoIry1Y/s320/5vids.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5278293649551820386" border="0" /></a><br />
Of course, all of them are "losers" according to stock price, but ERTS has been especially bad, only outdone by dismal THQ (THQI), <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/friday-video-game-update-will-thq.html">whose survival is in question</a>.  On a relative basis, the winners are Nintendo (NTDOY) and Activision (ATVI).  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/8132442">Nintendo Wii sales more than doubled over the Thanksgiving holiday week</a>, and Activision is doing a nice job diversifying its business into online gaming with the Blizzard combination. </p>

<p>Speculation is growing that EA will be taken over.  The <span style="font-style: italic;">Wall Street Journal</span>'s "Heard On The Street" column <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122887767234893907.html">suggested that Disney (DIS) might make a bid</a>, and it makes sense to me.  Disney owns ESPN, and EA specializes in sports games.  Very interesting.  But this is nothing more than a rumor.</p>

<p><span style="font-style: italic;">Barron's</span> <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/10/electronic-arts-widespread-downgrades-is-it-a-target/?mod=yahoobarrons">has a good rundown of analyst comments</a> following the profit warning today.  Speaking of <span style="font-style: italic;">Barron's</span>, the thoroughly enjoyable publication suggested it was <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB122834848600877577.html">Game On for Electronic Arts' Shares</a> just before this profit warning.  Ouch!  I don't mean to single them out, it's been a tough market for everyone, myself included.  Let's face it, reasoned arguments for owning stocks have not been working in this environment--we are now in the realm of the technician and the psychologist.  And on that basis, I find myself interested in ERTS.  Today was a 52-week low on huge "capitulation" type volume (6 times more than usual), and perhaps sellers will become exhausted in a few days.  On a move back down to the 15s, I might consider a speculative shot and hope that the House of Mouse comes to the rescue...</p>

<p>Disclosure:  No position in ERTS or DIS.  Long NTDOY and ATVI.<br />
See more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/ea_gets_sacked_will_disney_get.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/ea_gets_sacked_will_disney_get.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:24:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Starting To Hedge The Holiday Cheer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It's the Santa Claus rally, the S&amp;P is at 900, and I'm ambiguously hedging my holiday cheer.  On one hand, we're up 20% from our lows and could run to 1000 before major resistance.  On the other hand, we're already up 20% from our lows and I seriously doubt that this is anything more than a bear market Santa Claus oversold looking-for-a-sucker rally.  Here's a 3-month chart with some key levels to remember (click chart to enlarge):</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/ST6RD72SU7I/AAAAAAAABgM/3E3Pmkkx8-8/s1600-h/spsanta.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/ST6RD72SU7I/AAAAAAAABgM/3E3Pmkkx8-8/s320/spsanta.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5277815310115820466" border="0" /></a><br />
As you can see, we're in between the lows (741) and the highs (1007), and nearing the 50-day moving average (930).  Hence, my ambiguity.  Right now, we're in the middle.</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/ST6aoK18A6I/AAAAAAAABgc/NrNQ3rTReC8/s1600-h/grinch3.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 160px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/ST6aoK18A6I/AAAAAAAABgc/NrNQ3rTReC8/s320/grinch3.gif" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5277825828220830626" border="0" /></a>I'm bearish and grinch-ish, and eager to go short.  I want to throw out my longs, tie antlers to a dog, and steal the joy from Cindy Lou Who.</p>

<p>However, wise traders know you need to trade the tape you have, not the one you want.  The tape we have is one that is going higher in the face of high unemployment and disaster in Detroit (both the automakers and the 0-13 Lions).</p>

<p>So, I've got a smattering of longs.  The two best so far have been the utterly beaten Ultra Oil &amp; Gas ETF (DIG) and the "I'm gonna buy my kids a present even though I'm underwater on my house" play, Nintendo (NTDOY).  Toss in some steady-as-she-goes biotech, and I'm looking at something resembling a portfolio.</p>

<p>But even Santa needs a hedge.  Today I started very small positions in the Ultra Short Real Estate (SRS) and Ultra Short Financials (SKF), both of which are within shouting distance of their 52-week lows, despite making 52-week highs only 11 trading days ago.   They have red noses so far, but will come in handy if the weather gets foggy.  Look at the 3-month chart below, as a reminder why you can't buy and hold anything, even a short, in a bear market.  Wow!</p>

<p>  <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/ST6XS2pgYjI/AAAAAAAABgU/2VfEOFj5C40/s1600-h/santashorts.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/ST6XS2pgYjI/AAAAAAAABgU/2VfEOFj5C40/s320/santashorts.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5277822163487842866" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>Disclosures:  Long DIG, NTDOY, SRS, SKF<br />
See more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/starting_to_hedge_the_holiday.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/starting_to_hedge_the_holiday.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:21:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Reflecting On The Volatile Waves</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Surfers are philosophical by nature.  I'm not sure why that is, but I haven't met a surfer who doesn't think of catching a wave as a profound experience.  Each wave is a new opportunity for the perfect ride, and each wipeout contains an important lesson.  The same goes for stock market traders (although traders tend to be a bit more hyper, due to the faster pace, extreme levels of coffee, and lack of time in the sun).  But here is the key commonality:  The journey is more important than the destination.</p>

<p>[Note: Todd Harrison of <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/">Minyanville</a> says this all the time, so I want to take one sentence to again remind everyone how insightful Minyanville is not only in terms of financial education, but also in personal and professional attitude.  They just won an Emmy Award, and are more than deserving.]</p>

<p>Back to stocks and surfing and my point.  The point is, the ultimate destination (making money) is not unimportant, but you'll never get there if you don't concentrate on one wave (one trade or investment) at a time.  The waves are bigger and badder than usual in the current stock market.  For many investors, sitting on the beach in cash is the safest approach.  For many traders, however, this is an exciting (though challenging) environment.</p>

<p>Coming into the week, I was open to the idea that the lows for 2008 are in.  But the truth is, that view doesn't affect my trading very much.  I think most people have it backward--the long term is more uncertain and less knowable than the short term.  Who knows what will happen by January, or by 2010, or over the next 5 years?  We know there will be an ocean, but we can only see the next few waves forming, and we can only ride the one we're standing on.</p>

<p>THE WEEK IN REVIEW</p>

<p>After Monday's drop, stops were hit and some long positions were gone.  On Tuesday, the market showed strength and I jumped back in, riding to some nice gains.  Wednesday extended the gains, but by the end of the day I was growing cautious, and bought a short ETF at a reasonable price.  Yesterday, with an eye to the upcoming jobs report, I got more short and less long, locking in gains and preparing for the probability of dismal news.  Today we got that dismal news and the shorts are working.</p>

<p>I'm not explaining this process so anyone will copy it (everyone's style should be unique), and I'm certainly not boasting because not all my trades were perfect.  I'm simply trying to explain the journey, why I can be bullish on Tuesday and bearish on Thursday.  It's not meant to be confusing or contradictory.  My overall message is that the waves are fast and furious, and on days that I can't manage risk and move in and out of the surf, I'm on the beach.  I will likely cover many of my shorts by the end of the day and head for Margaritaville.</p>

<p>There will come a time when the stock market will offer longer, smoother rides.  For now, it's important to simply be careful out there.  Enjoy the weekend and check out this guy's journey!</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7nS_aR8XX_U&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7nS_aR8XX_U&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/reflecting_on_the_volatile_wav.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/reflecting_on_the_volatile_wav.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:07:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Enjoy The Holidays, But Prepare For A Cold Winter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I was warming to the idea that the low was in for 2008.  With 20-some days to go in the year, anything could happen, but there has certainly been resilience in the face of bad news.  Friday will be a huge test, because bad news in the jobs report is the baddest news of all.  I would not be surprised to see some selling pressure ahead of the number.  But IF, and it's a big IF, we rally on a bad jobs report, shorts could get squeezed and we'd have a significant continuation of the holiday rally.</p>

<p>Despite Monday's scary drop, many technical traders consider it a textbook "50% retracement" move.  What that means, basically, is that it's not surprising to see a move in one direction pull back in the opposite direction by half before it resumes.  Indeed, expecting a retracement is one of Gartman's rules:</p>

<p><span style="font-family:Arial;"><blockquote style="font-weight: bold;">13.           Respect and embrace the very normal 50-62% retracements that take prices           back to major trends. If a trade is missed, wait patiently for the           market to retrace. Far more often than not, retracements happen...           just as we are about to give up hope that they shall not.</blockquote><br />
</span>What was shocking, of course, is that the retracement happened in only one day!  But let's look at where we stand right now in the S&amp;P 500 (click chart to enlarge).</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STbBhO8SWSI/AAAAAAAABf0/HIFB70Y1Fa8/s1600-h/spdec3.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STbBhO8SWSI/AAAAAAAABf0/HIFB70Y1Fa8/s320/spdec3.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5275616790201915682" border="0" /></a>The red line is the 50-day moving average, and right now it sits around 950.  Also, it should be noted that the rally pulled back just before the S&amp;P reached 900, so 900 will act as resistance as well.</p>

<p>How am I playing it?  I'm sticking with the biotech names that have showed good relative strength, like AMGN, EBS, CELG, and GILD.  But as we get closer to resistance, I'll be placing stops to lock in gains.  I don't know when the next leg down will occur--maybe this month or maybe next year.  But I'm convinced there will be another leg down and don't want to be caught by surprise.</p>

<p>An important indicator on my screen is the real estate sector.  Many have mentioned that commercial real estate is the next big shoe to drop, if it hasn't started already.  It's easy to track "real estate fear" by watching the Ultrashort Real Estate ETF (SRS).  (click chart to enlarge)</p>

<p><br />
<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STbGeTPte3I/AAAAAAAABgE/edNanJyWJQw/s1600-h/srssp.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STbGeTPte3I/AAAAAAAABgE/edNanJyWJQw/s320/srssp.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5275622237375658866" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>As you can see, SRS is still in an uptrend.  The volatility in SRS is crazy, so please handle with care if you trade it, but even if you don't trade it you can watch it for signs of a market meltdown.  Recent support has been just below 120, and if SRS gets close to 115 or so, I'll be looking to buy.  The point is, we should have a plan for the next leg down even if that simply means selling some longs and raising cash.  Enjoy the holiday rally while it lasts, but don't get stuck out in the cold when it's over.</p>

<p>[Note: After writing this, SRS did get to 115 and I started a small position.]</p>

<p>Disclosures:  Long AMGN, EBS, CELG, GILD, SRS.<br />
See more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/enjoy_the_holidays_but_prepare.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/enjoy_the_holidays_but_prepare.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:00:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Avoid The Illusion Of Relative Returns</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Investors are being disabused of many conventional notions this year. If the first giant to fall was <span style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline">"</span><a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/buy-and-hold-beware-devil-you-dont-know.html">buy and hold"</a>, the second should be the idea of <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">relative returns</span>. Relative returns make us feel good, but they can be quite dangerous. Here's why.</p>

<p>Mutual fund companies have sold us the idea of relative returns because it makes them look good. They want to show that they can beat the market (although they remind us that this is only for professionals). So they take a market index like the S&amp;P 500, and use that as a measuring stick for their fund. If the S&amp;P 500 is up 10% in a year, a mutual fund wants to be up more than 10% in that same year. And I would agree, that's a good return. But the situation is not so rosy when the market is down. If the S&amp;P 500 is down 42% (as it is this year), a mutual fund might brag that it is only down 35%. Sure, they beat an index fund by 7% (not including loads and fees, of course), but so what? You're still down 35%! Down 35% is not a good return.</p>

<p>I'm not saying it's easy to get a positive return. Most people, including me, are down this year. But in a bear market, relative returns can't buy you a cup of coffee. It's time to think from a different perspective strategically. It's time to think about absolute returns.</p>

<p>Focusing on absolute returns helps an investor's psyche because it doesn't play the game of chasing winners or holding losers. If I'm worried about relative returns, I might be inclined to carelessly chase a rally even though I know it won't last, or stubbornly hold a loser as long as it's doing better than the Dow. I might avoid taking profits (i.e. making money) because I want to beat the market.</p>

<p>If I don't care about relative returns, I can simply focus on making money. When I make a trade, I'm looking to cut my losers so I don't lose money. If a trade is working, I'm looking to maximize gains in my account, not on paper. I think most people tend to run their portfolios like a mutual fund because they've absorbed the conventional wisdom of buy and hold along with relative returns. I used to do this. But I think there's a better way. I'm still learning about absolute returns, but here are some initial thoughts to get started.</p>

<p>HOW TO GET ABSOLUTE RETURNS</p>

<p><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cut losers quickly.</span> This is rule #1. Absolute returns is all about avoiding big losses. If you are holding a stock and waiting for it to come back, ask yourself this question: Of all the investments available to me right now, is this stock the best opportunity for me to make money in a reasonable timeframe? If the answer to that question is no, sell that stock ASAP and put your money where you can get a positive return. Why hold Citigroup (C) when you can buy Amgen (AMGN)? (click chart to enlarge)</p>

<p><br />
<div></div><div><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5275427794466189858" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 180px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STYVoO9hMiI/AAAAAAAABfk/8_fq9rjdI3w/s320/cvsamgn.png" border="0" /><br />
<span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><br />
Look at the big picture.</span> Absolute returns means you need to look at more than just your stocks. You need to look at overall net worth. If you are holding debt at 7%, and making market returns of 5%, that's a return of -2%. You may not be able to avoid all debt (if you have a mortgage, for example), but if we've learned anything from this crisis, it's that profits are fleeting if we can't handle our debts.</p>

<p><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"></span><strong>Consider alternative investments.</strong> Perhaps you are comfortable with mutual funds or stocks. That's okay, but we've also learned that stocks around the world have provided very little benefit in terms of diversification. Stocks of every size, shape, and nationality have been going down. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) make it easy to try different asset classes. You can buy the dollar (UUP) or gold (GLD) or natural gas (UNG), or you can short those same assets. You can also short the market through ETFs like the short Dow (DOG). The point is, being long a bunch of different stocks may not help get you absolute returns, but there are other options out there for your money. (click chart to enlarge)</p>

</div><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5275427791176006770" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 180px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STYVoCtE_HI/AAAAAAAABfs/e-mfUrV-Wx8/s320/altinv.png" border="0" />

<p><br />
<p></p><p>[Disclosure: Long AMGN.]</p><br />
see more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/avoid_the_illusion_of_relative.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/avoid_the_illusion_of_relative.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:18:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Monday Observations</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After a bullish run to end November, the markets welcomed December with a big, fat meltdown.  Many traders have become more constructive, but today shows why risk management is still the key.  You may be tired of my saying that.  I don't blame you, I'm tired of thinking it.  I'd like to see a bull market where we could talk about taking risk rather than managing it.  But alas, this is the market we have.</p>

<p>It remains to be seen whether this is the beginning of a new leg down, or a sharp pullback in a bear market rally.  It doesn't really matter to me--I have stops that tell me when to get out of my positions.  Many of them were triggered today, but 2 positions remain on my books:  Amgen (AMGN) and Emergent BioSolutions (EBS).  Frankly, I'm barely comfortable holding these, but the relative strength today has kept me in the names for now.  Here's today's chart of AMGN and EBS compared to the S&amp;P 500.</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STResogmZfI/AAAAAAAABfU/JdSrR3NOSuE/s1600-h/dec1.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STResogmZfI/AAAAAAAABfU/JdSrR3NOSuE/s320/dec1.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274945184439100914" border="0" /></a><br />
I was actually looking to buy the Ultrashort Real Estate ETF (SRS) today, but didn't get even the slightest pullback to do so, nor was I at my computer at 3pm when it really started to roll.  Holders of SRS made 35% today!  Something to consider:  In a bear market, isn't it better to be consistently looking for short entry points rather than long entry points?  Here's a chart of SRS from the past 5 days. However, it's notable that even with the move today, SRS is not back to where it was last Monday.  Timing is everything on these ultra ETFs.</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STResuvBQPI/AAAAAAAABfc/LPVuzMxI48M/s1600-h/srsdec.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/STResuvBQPI/AAAAAAAABfc/LPVuzMxI48M/s320/srsdec.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5274945186110193906" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>Disclosures:  Long AMGN and EBS<br />
See more at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/monday_observations.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/12/monday_observations.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:03:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Turkey With A Side Of Bull For Thanksgiving </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Pundits have been calling for a market bottom for months and this time they may be right. I do not take this to mean that the pundits are now ahead of the curve, I'm just acknowledging that even a blind pig finds a truffle occasionally.</p>

<p>More importantly, some astute market watchers that I follow have also become more constructive of late. They all come from different perspectives and use different strategies, but they are folks I respect and I encourage you to read for yourself: <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/articles/AAPL-GOOG-markets-TGT-HD-AMZN/index/a/20043">Todd Harrison</a>, <a href="http://www.raymondjames.com/inv_strat.htm">Jeff Saut</a>, <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=937995675">Carter Worth</a>, and <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/articles/AAPL-LOW-AMZN-blk-SKF-spx/index/a/20117">Jeff Cooper</a>. No one is necessarily saying that we've seen THE bottom, but it very well could be A bottom for 2008.</p>

<p>As for me, I am warming to this view. The most compelling argument to me, aside from smart folks looking to buy, is that there will be performance chasing into year end. As institutions (especially long-only mutual funds) scramble to put the best spin on a very bad year, they will not want to be left behind if the market catches a bid. On the short side, sellers are seeing fewer opportunities and may decide their fun is done for a while. Let's look at the S&amp;P 500 for some context (click chart to enlarge).</p>

<div><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273004564419990738" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; width: 320px; height: 180px; text-align: center;" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SS15trlEVNI/AAAAAAAABfE/55WmYE0RtLY/s320/spmas.png" border="0" /></div>
<p>As you can see, the past 3 months have been terrible, and the S&amp;P is down a cool 30% over that timeframe. In order to make up for a 30% decline, the S&amp;P will need to go up around 43%. I doubt we'll see that this year or next. However, I think a move to the 50-day moving average (around 990--green line above) is likely. The 200-day (around 1240--red line above) is what many market watchers use to determine a "healthy demand" for stocks, but I don't think we'll make it there. In fact, I would be a seller again around the 50-day.  In the meantime, a move from 860 to 990 would be nothing to sneeze at. That'd be another 15% for the S&amp;P, and some stocks would benefit even more.  Although I've been bearish for quite a while, there just might be some Bull to go with my Thanksgiving Turkey. </p><p> </p><p>As I've said for a while now, I like biotech to outperform in this environment because it has little or no exposure to housing prices, the consumer, or credit issues. Health care in general could get some sort of boost from the new administration, but I would not invest on that basis. I've mentioned Amgen (AMGN), Celgene (CELG), Isis (ISIS), and Illumina (ILMN) many times, but another stock I've been watching but until now never pulled the trigger on is Emergent BioSolutions (EBS). <a href="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/vanmeerten/2008/11/picks_for_november_8_2008.php">Jim Van Meerten</a> mentioned this stock on his blog on InvestorPlace. I don't pretend to know the ins and outs of this company, but I will show you the prettiest chart I've seen all year (click on chart to enlarge). </p><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5273011333417601410" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; width: 320px; height: 180px; text-align: center;" alt="" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SS1_3sD3CYI/AAAAAAAABfM/KZiiqmNIn10/s320/ebs.png" border="0" /> <p></p><p>That, my friends, is a thing of beauty.  EBS consistently bounces off its 50-day, and has not come close to its 200-day.  You don't need to be a technical trader to see that there has been consistent demand for this stock.  I started EBS with a partial position, and will look to add on a pullback.  As with all my current picks, I will be placing stops for protection.  Also, if and when the S&amp;P gets close to 990, I will look to take profits.  </p><p> </p><p>Enjoy your Turkey!</p><p> </p><p>Posted on my personal blog at www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com. Disclosure:  Long EBS, CELG, AMGN, ISIS, ILMN.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/turkey_with_a_side_of_bull_for.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/turkey_with_a_side_of_bull_for.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:07:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Managing Risks For Successful Day Trading</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>With market volatility so high, there are some excellent day trading opportunities out there if you know how to manage your risk.  Many consider day trading quite risky, and indeed it can be.  However, I would argue (and <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/buy-and-hold-beware-devil-you-dont-know.html">I have argued</a>) that buy and hold investing can be just as risky, it's just not advertised as such.</p>

<p>So how do we manage risks while day trading?  There are several ways, but today I'd like to highlight the basic strategy of using buy and sell stops.</p>

<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">1. Use a buy stop to determine a good entry point.</span></p>

<p>Many people are familiar with sell stops, but not as many people use buy stops.  The concept is simple.  You set your buy stop at a certain percentage, certain dollar amount, or certain technical level above the current price.  So if SRS (Ultrashort Real Estate) is currently trading at 130, a buy stop could be placed 1% above at 131.30, for example.  If SRS trades up to 131.30, you will buy the stock at that price.  If SRS never gets there, you will not buy it and you should be happy because that means the stock is either moving sideways or down, which would not be a profitable day trade.</p>

<p>It may seem counterintuitive to want to buy a stock at a higher price, but day trading is all about catching upward price movement.  This is not an excercise in fundamental analysis where you are buying the stock at an appropriate value and giving it time to realize that value.  In day trading, you simply want to buy a change in the stock price, and it doesn't matter if the change is for legitimate reasons or daily noise.  With a buy stop, you are betting that the price will continue to move up as it triggers your stop.  If you buy as the stock is moving downward, chances are high that you will immediately be underwater on your day trade.  That's not good.</p>

<p>Personally, I like to use trailing buy stops in order to catch reversals in price movement.  Let's say SRS, again, is trading at 130.  If I set a trailing buy stop at 1%, my initial buy point will be 131.30.  If SRS goes down, my buy stop will trail the price downward, and maintain a distance of 1%.  The benefit here is that as SRS continues to get cheaper, my buy point continues to get more attractive.  Once SRS turns around and starts moving up, I will buy that upward price action.  Instead of buying a hard stop at 131.30, I buy a trailing stop in this example at 127.26--a significant difference in price.  Here's how it looks on the chart (click on chart to enlarge).</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSxChlhokPI/AAAAAAAABe0/DX25x6Ps-lk/s1600-h/srs1136.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSxChlhokPI/AAAAAAAABe0/DX25x6Ps-lk/s320/srs1136.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5272662408520306930" border="0" /></a></p>

<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">2.  Use a sell stop to cut losses or lock in profits </span></p>

<p>So I own SRS at 127.26.  The key to day trading after buying a stock is to prevent losses and lock in a gain.  The best way to do this is to set a sell stop.  Without sell stops, day trading can be very risky because you could be down several percent in a flash.  Initially, I like to set a sell stop either at the day's purchase price or at a minimal loss, like 1-2%.  If I set the stop at 127.26, I will likely get stopped out quickly unless I caught the move just right.  Therefore, I often give my trade a little room to work, but no more than 2%.</p>

<p>If the trade is working and I'm up 1-2%, I start thinking of how to preserve the gains.  The first step is to never let a winning trade turn into a losing trade.  In our example, I'd set my stop at 127.26.  The worst case scenario at this point is to finish the trade flat.  After that I might set a hard stop after the stock has gone up and I see some support on the chart, around 130.</p>

<p>Again, trailing stops can be very useful.  After I see that my stop at 130 has held and SRS is continuing to move up, I can set a trailing stop of 1% to try to maximize gains.  In our example, SRS makes it to 140 and my stop trails it to 138.60.  When SRS pulls back, the trailing stop is triggered for a very nice gain.  I might have made more if it goes higher, but I can rest easy knowing it was a successful day trade  (click on chart to enlarge).</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSw_XwZOtaI/AAAAAAAABes/86bxZAAOk00/s1600-h/srs1159.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 181px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSw_XwZOtaI/AAAAAAAABes/86bxZAAOk00/s320/srs1159.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5272658941104272802" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>That's an example of a big winner (almost 9%), but even gains of 1% can be worthwhile over time, as long as you don't lose more than 1% on any given trade.  Let's say you start with $10,000 and you trade the full amount each day for 20 days.  If you lose 1% 5 times (25% of your trades), are flat 5 times (25% of the trades), and gain 1% 10 times (50% of trades), you will probably end up with around $10,500 when it's all said and done, a gain of 5%.  Of course it depends on when you make your gains and when you make your losses, but my calculations are based on a random order of gains and losses.  The point is that sometimes you will win and sometimes you will lose, but you only need to win half the time for some nice gains.  5% is not bad at all for a month's worth of trading.</p>

<p>Here's the key.  Some days you might catch a big move and make much more than 1%.  Those will be great days and they can make your month or your year.  But you should never lose more than 1-2% on a single day trade.  Not only will a big loss be difficult to make up, it can be psychologically and emotionally damaging, and will affect your trading negatively.  Using stops takes the emotion out of trading.  You will undoubtedly get stopped out plenty of times, and perhaps become frustrated by missed opportunities.  But opportunities are made up easier than losses, and risk management is all about avoiding disaster.</p>

<p>Day trading is not for everyone--it's time consuming, takes planning, and you need to be able to focus on the market during trading hours.  Also, many brokers have rules that limit day trading.  Unless you have $25,000 in your account, you may be restricted to 3 day trades in a 5 day period, and if you exceed 3 you may face restrictions.  That said, I think day trading in a volatile environment can be a low risk endeavor as long as you stick to your stops.  As you close out trades each day, you will never wake up and helplessly see your stock gapping down 10%.  In my day trading account, I have missed the recent 15% or so up move in the S&amp;P 500, but I also missed the 25% decline since October 1st.  In day trading, I'm not a slave to relative returns, I can pick my spots and try to make money whether the overall market is going up or down.  In my opinion, this is an important skill in a difficult market.</p>

<p>[Read more on my personal blog at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a>]</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/managing_risks_for_successful.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/managing_risks_for_successful.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:15:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Emotions In Trading: Is Panic Underrated?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/context-check-watching-trading-range.html">Earlier this week</a>, I noted the trading range in the S&amp;P 500 (approximately the low to mid 800s up to 1000). The risk / reward favored a bounce from the bottom of the range, especially after last Thursday's huge reversal up from the lows. However, I also noted that if we broke the lows, there could be another painful leg down.</p>

<div><div></div><div><div>That painful leg started on Wednesday when the lows were broken and continued Thursday. Here's a chart showing the break--remember, past support (the red line) now becomes future resistance.

<p><br />
</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div></div><div></div><div></div><div><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5271139925253216514" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 180px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSbZ1ZYY2QI/AAAAAAAABeM/3jgQti8ZbZA/s320/spbreak.png" border="0" /> </p>

<p><br />
</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>I did a lot of selling on Wednesday as the break began. Sure, that was only a couple days ago, but in percentage terms it's been a huge move. Around 10% since Wednesday in the averages (and worse for many individual stocks, right Citigroup?).</p>

<p><br />
</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div></div><div></div><div><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5271139922412169986" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 180px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSbZ1OzB6wI/AAAAAAAABeE/l4B0c_N8Idk/s320/decline.png" border="0" /></p>

<p><br />
</div><div><div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>One might say selling was a bad move, that I'm selling near the lows. That view may turn out to be correct--I've certainly been wrong many times and will be wrong many times more. But the same argument against selling could have been made (and in fact was made) about the "lows" in March, July, and October. We are lower now than at all those previous lows. Discipline in this market has saved me from huge losses. Eventually, one of the short term lows will turn out to be THE low, but the only way to have capital left to take advantage of THE low is to protect capital in the meantime, which brings us back to discipline and risk management.</p>

</div>
<div>Psychologically, I find it interesting that when it comes to the markets, people are advised to be completely unemotional. While I agree that emotions can cloud judgment, I would also note that if we are aware of our emotions they can clue us in to important actions. In other areas of life, the emotion of fear often spurs prudent action. When we are afraid for our safety, we seek protection. 

<p><br />
</div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>In early October I told my wife I was really worried about the market, that I had a gut feeling that something was seriously wrong. She took notice because I rarely express fear like that, I'm usually quite happy-go-lucky (despite the bearishness on this blog). Well, the market crashed the following week, and although I was heavy in cash I was not completely out as I should have been. I rationalized, I listened to the "don't panic" conventional wisdom, and ignored my fears. I'm NOT saying we should be quick to panic, but I am saying that panic can be underrated. Sometimes we should listen to our emotions and try to evaluate them rather than dismiss them out of hand. They are there for a reason. </div><div></p>

</div><div>Here's a 1-year chart of various good times to panic. </div><div>

</div></div><div><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5271140244592394450" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 180px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSbaH_AyANI/AAAAAAAABec/lT7e5Ncl1xs/s320/sppanic.png" border="0" /> 

<p><br />
<div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div>Notice how small the early drops look compared to the more recent drops. But I do remember January being quite scary as volatility started to ramp. I also remember the conventional wisdom crowd in January advising everyone not to panic. I remember doing a lot of selling in January. It felt terrible and I felt like a foolish chicken. I don't feel so foolish anymore.</div><div></div></p>

<p><br />
<div>Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to endorse panic as a strategy for making money. It isn't. If anything it's a last gasp at self-protection. I also don't mean to make light of panic selling because I know people have lost a lot in this market, and it feels terrible. What I do mean to do is spur you, reader, to think about your emotions in trading. Emotions can be dismissed, managed, or acted upon, but the point is that we all have them and we all need to learn what to do with them.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/emotions_in_trading_is_panic_underrated.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/emotions_in_trading_is_panic_underrated.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:49:37 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Context Check:  Watching The Trading Range, Managing Risk</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The market appears to be holding the lows (3:55 p.m. update: I guess not!), but there's certainly not much confidence out there.  </p>

<p>Most traders I follow are expecting a rally of some kind.  Selling seems to be reaching the exhaustion point, and the technical setup (holding the lows) is favorable.  The closing low this year was 848.92, and the intraday low was 818.69.  Here's the chart of the S&amp;P 500.  Note the fairly obvious trading range.</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSQ8IM_87qI/AAAAAAAABd8/kYUp6cCnqiI/s1600-h/sp1119.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSQ8IM_87qI/AAAAAAAABd8/kYUp6cCnqiI/s320/sp1119.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5270403575556402850" border="0" /></a>Being near the bottom of the range is not pleasant, and although a bounce would make sense, I can't say anything is looking very good right now.  Therefore, it's important to plan for both scenarios.  If we bounce, I will hold my current longs and probably add to them.  If we break the lows, I will raise cash and live to fight another day.</p>

<p>The worst looking indicators in my book, other than the car crash known as the auto industry, are the real estate and financial sectors.  Unlike the overall market, they are at new lows.  The Ultrashort ETFs (SRS and SKF) continue to work, but I am out of them for now (regrettably).</p>

<p>The only relative strength on my screen is in large cap biotech.  I am long Celgene (CELG) and Amgen (AMGN).  My other longs, in the video game sector and smaller biotech, are acting terribly and the price action must be respected.  I have no position in Electronic Arts (ERTS), but <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/10/friday-video-game-update-buying.html">I mentioned that I'd be interested under $20</a>.  I didn't buy any, but I notice today that it has a 17-handle.  Yuck!  This is why stops are important, and one should have an exit strategy for every trade.</p>

<p>Along those lines, I received a very thoughtful comment regarding <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/06/trading-update-tc-pbr.html">a post from the beginning of June</a> where I wrote about trying to use predetermined buy points on certain stocks for a trade.  Obviously, most of those stocks are much lower now than they were then, and I don't use that strategy with any regularity. The commenter, who is just now reading that post for some reason, ridiculed the <a href="http://www.dacharts.com/articles/_22rulestrading.htm">Gartman trading rules</a> and suggested I "go down to the circus and ask the other clowns" what stocks to buy.  Insightful.</p>

<p>This goes to the point I was making in<a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/buy-and-hold-beware-devil-you-dont-know.html"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span>Buy And Hold:  Beware The Devil You Don't Know</a>.  There are many viable trading strategies out there, and buy and hold (in some version) is one of them.  My problem with it in its conventional wisdom form is that it's sold as a relatively safe strategy.  In my view, the only safe strategy is one that includes selling as part of the plan.  Regarding any previous trade idea espoused on this blog, none of them should be regarded as ideas for anyone other than me, and even for me they are not ideas for the long haul with no exit strategy.  I know I will be wrong sometimes, perhaps frequently, and that is why I believe so strongly in risk management.  If there's one think this market has taught us, it's that we ignore risk management at our own peril.</p>

<p>Update--Managing Risk:  3:55 p.m.  We will close below the lows, and it again calls into question how low the "lows" can go.  Therefore, I'm trimming nearly all my positions and living to fight another day.  Risk management means sometimes you take a small loss to avoid an even bigger loss.  Good luck out there! </p>

<p>Disclosure:  Long Celgene (CELG).  [sold my AMGN for a small loss]<br />
Posted simultaneously on my personal blog, <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/context_check_watching_the_tra.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/context_check_watching_the_tra.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:17:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Buy And Hold:  Beware The Devil You Don&apos;t Know</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I fully intended to write an article bashing the buy and hold strategy, and indeed part of me still wants to write such an article. There is much to bash. I even had a title prepared: <em>Buy and Hold Didn't Die, It Never Really Lived</em>. (Cue the YouTube video of Braveheart)</p>

<p>But alas, it is difficult to confirm the death of buy and hold investing when so few of its defenders actually mean the same thing when they defend it. There are several buy and holds.  Here are some samples:<br />
<ul><li><a href="http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/archives/2008/11/the_death_of_bu.html">An article</a> found on InvestorPlace suggests that underweighting certain sectors and changing 25% of the stocks in one's portfolio each year is a version of buy and hold investing. (Is that really holding?) </li><br />
<li><a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/11/16/dont-sell-this-stock-ever.aspx?source=ihpdspmrc0000001">An article</a> from Motley Fool says the goal is to find a stock that you "never, ever" need to sell. (How does one make money with that strategy?) </li><br />
<li><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/106108-is-buy-and-hold-dead-hardly">An article</a> found on Seeking Alpha talks about understanding secular and cyclical bull and bear markets. (Why? To better time the market?) </li><br />
<li>Finally, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/24/magazines/fortune/buyandhold_okeefe.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008102816">an article</a> from Forbes online drops the names of heavy hitters like Grantham, Siegel, Malkiel, Bogle, and--cue music--Buffett to support sticking with buy and hold. (But don't all those guys have different strategies?) </li></ul>I'm not sure which buy and hold strategy to bash. But as I was doing some research, I realized it's not so much a specific strategy that bothers me, it's the conventional wisdom that bothers me. Conventional wisdom is dangerous because it is what the masses take for granted, it is the lowest common denominator of understanding. In the form of conventional wisdom, the buy and hold strategy has become a soothing crutch for the average investor, a call to inaction, a warning against straying from the path of pseudo-scientific statistical outcomes. <em></p>

<blockquote><em>Don't try to time the market, it can't be done. It's better to do nothing! Just buy and hold. Everything will be fine in the long run. Assume 8% annual returns and plug it into the retirement calculator. Above all, never panic. Do not to interrupt the wealth machine with your simple emotions.</em></blockquote></em>
When I think of buy and hold as conventional wisdom, I think of my mother. Like most people, what she knows about investing comes from pamphlets received from kind and well-meaning financial planners. If I were to ask her what buy and hold means, she would probably say that it means you are supposed to keep putting money into stocks (or, more likely, mutual funds) and hold onto them because over the long term, the stock market always goes up...eventually.

<p><br />
You may say this is a caricature of buy and hold, but this is how conventional wisdom works.  When the market goes down, casual investors consider it outside the norm and become confused, nervous, or even angry and helpless (What should I do?  I can't sell, can I?).  A few might become overconfident and throw good money after bad. They trust the strategy and its familiar simplicity, and they are not often presented with alternatives. Worst of all, they are not taught risk management.  Why have a stop-loss when the market always comes back?</p>

<p>When buy and holders speak of risk, they are usually not referring to risk at all. They speak of missed opportunities. They trot out charts and studies that show (as always, over the long term) the dangers of not being in stocks, with relative performance (how one does compared with the S&amp;P 500) as the measure of success. However, in this day and age when savings and retirement funds are invested in the markets, when <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/10/investing-saving-and-deflation.html">the lines between saving and investing have been blurred</a>, shouldn't people be aware that there have been long periods of time where markets go down or sideways? Shouldn't people be shown a chart of Japan's Nikkei 225 from November 1989 to today?</p>

<p><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5269534519973668802" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; width: 320px; height: 180px; text-align: center;" alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SSElugqwZ8I/AAAAAAAABd0/d12NOrwWxJg/s320/n225.png" border="0" /><br />
That should make you think.  It's Japan, not Zimbabwe.  Now of course it is absurd to say that the past returns of the Nikkei over a certain period of time are indicative of future results (disregarding the similar storyline of a real estate bubble, extremely low interest rates, and a deflationary environment).  But it is just as absurd to use buying Microsoft in the 80s as an example of a buy and hold strategy.  The truth is that past returns are not indicative of future results, it's more than a disclaimer, and no amount of academic studies referencing the market's history can change that.  We can use history as a guide, but that's not risk management.  Risk management isn't planning for the norm, it's protecting yourself against the extreme or unusual (read some Nassim Taleb, please).</p>

<p>You may now be thinking that I've decided to just bash buy and hold after all.  Not so.  (Okay, I did get some shots in.)  I respect that some investors, using their own version of a buy and hold strategy, have been quite successful.  But some have been unsuccessful, perhaps by picking the wrong stocks and holding them to near zero (yes, smart people have done this).  In the same way, there are successful and unsuccessful short term traders who attempt to time the market and use a variety of methods.</p>

<p>My point is not that one method of investing is better than any other.  I have my preference, which fits my personality, risk tolerance, time horizon, and skill set.  My point is that buy and hold has become conventional wisdom as the "right" approach for the casual investor, whereas day trading has become synonymous with risky behavior. The truth is that while both approaches have risks, only one of the approaches readily acknowledges that risk.  So which is more dangerous--the devil you know, or the devil you are led to believe does not exist?  </p>

<p>[Simultaneously posted on my personal blog at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a>]</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/buy_and_hold_beware_the_devil.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/buy_and_hold_beware_the_devil.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:03:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Friday Video Game Update: Will THQ Survive?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sales of video game software in October were strong, rising 35% year over year compared to expectations of 20-25%.  But hold on before you run out and buy a basket of video game stocks, because there are definite winners and losers.</p>

<p>I won't recap the October number, you can <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/video-games-ring-up-strong/story.aspx?guid=%7BA509687D-1353-4263-B655-CF1A6662C25E%7D&amp;siteid=yhoof">read about it here</a>.  Instead, I'd like to focus on THQ (THQI) as a cautionary tale.  THQ came into the current console cycle (meaning: the release of the Xbox 360, Playstation 3, and Nintendo Wii) in a strong position.  The company was growing, and management had a plan to increase their intellectual property.  As opposed to licensed games where THQ pays a fee for using certain characters or stories (i.e. to Disney/Pixar, for making a game based on the movie <span style="font-style: italic;">Cars</span>), intellectual property would be fully owned by the company, resulting in higher profit margins.  Think Take-Two (TTWO) and Grand Theft Auto.</p>

<p>Additionally, as it became clear the Wii was going to be the big console winner, some speculated that THQ would benefit due to its past success on Nintendo (NTDOY) platforms and a history of family-friendly games.  THQ management believed this themselves. Everything was lining up well for THQ.  You can read about their plans and their optimism in old <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/thqi/transcripts">conference call transcrips on Seeking Alpha</a>.  Here are some highlights from CEO Brian Ferrill on the August 2007 call:</p>

<blockquote>On today's call, I would like to share with you our THQ is continuing to execute on our strategies to drive revenue and margin growth. Specifically, we plan to, one, grow annual revenues from our big family and casual franchises. Two, sequel and extend our growing portfolio of owned intellectual properties. Three, introduce one to three new intellectual properties each year that have long-term franchise potential....

<p>At these years E3, it was clear that Nintendo's new platforms are truly expanding the markets for video games and we are excited to build upon our heritage as the leading independent publisher on Nintendo's hardware....</p><p>
</p><p>We plan to ship more than 1 million units each of five owned properties, Stuntman, Juiced, Frontlines, MX vs. ATV and Destroy All Humans!
</p></blockquote><p></p>
But, in the end, it all comes down to executing on good, popular games.  By THQ's own admission, titles like Stuntman and Juiced were simply not competitive.  Now I wonder if THQ can survive to see the next cycle.  Activision (ATVI) has solidified its position by combining with Blizzard and a gazillion World of Warcraft addicts.  Electronic Arts (ERTS) has been struggling, but the sports games keep the cash flowing.  Some say Take-Two is a one-hit wonder, but it's a heckuva hit (Grand Theft Auto) and they have arguably some of the best creative talent in the business (Bioshock was very impressive).  THQ, in my opinion, doesn't come close with its slate of games.

<p><br />
My friend <a href="http://www.longshorttrader.com/2008/10/thq-is-ultimate-fighting-stock.html">The Long/Short Trader is more optimistic on THQ</a> (after being pessimistic in 2007), based on the Ultimate Fighting Championship license and a possible takeover bid.  While it wouldn't surprise me if THQ got snapped up by Disney or Electronic Arts, I'm beginning to wonder if that isn't the only way THQ can make it.  When the next console cycle begins, video game publishers will need to ramp up spending to develop the next generation of games.  Even though THQ currently has no debt, they are not expected to make a profit in FY09.  They are struggling just when the industry should be near peak profitability for the cycle.</p>

<p>So, the best option for THQ, in my opinion, is to shop themselves to a bigger player.  They may survive as an independent company, but they are on the road to being a second-rate publisher.  Indeed, the stock shows that they look less like strong and healthy Activision and more like totally dysfunctional Midway (MWY).  Ouch. (Click on the chart to enlarge, but beware--it's ugly.)<br />
    <br />
<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SR3G9nrf1AI/AAAAAAAABdE/iiRMBLXydNg/s1600-h/thq2yr.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SR3G9nrf1AI/AAAAAAAABdE/iiRMBLXydNg/s320/thq2yr.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268585901019091970" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>Disclosure:  Long ATVI, TTWO, NTDOY<br />
See more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/friday_video_game_update_will.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/friday_video_game_update_will.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Low And (Be)Hold, It&apos;s A Bear Market Rally</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Traders were wondering if the October 10th low would hold in the S&P 500, and today they got their answer, at least for the short term.  The result was a huge rally today and an opportunity to go long with a clear risk / reward setup.  Please see my previous post for a <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/context-check-technical-picture-mixed.html">Context Check</a>, where I mused over whether or not the lows would hold and explained why I carried a bearish bent.  The context chart:</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRxz18w4qsI/AAAAAAAABcc/nWfCkDm-Em4/s1600-h/sp900.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRxz18w4qsI/AAAAAAAABcc/nWfCkDm-Em4/s320/sp900.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268213034798066370" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>The 900 level did not hold, and as expected we quickly fell to 839, which was the intraday low from October 10th. You can see from today's daily chart how the decline sped up when the lows were temporarily broken. Even if you don't "believe in" technical analysis, this is how support levels work.  They act as decision points for the market.  Once broken, stops are triggered and many traders sell to fight another day.  The daily chart today shows the break of 839, and you can see the immediate and dramatic slide after support was broken.</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRxz2Xue10I/AAAAAAAABcs/g6-dZT73UR0/s1600-h/spbreak.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRxz2Xue10I/AAAAAAAABcs/g6-dZT73UR0/s320/spbreak.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268213042035742530" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>However, even if you do "believe in" technical analysis, today showed that it's as much art as science.  Yes, the lows were broken, some stops were triggered, and there was a quick drop.  However, the bears ran out of steam.  The quick move back up above 839 was a very bullish sign.</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRyuzFbOIcI/AAAAAAAABc0/UmZ8CduWQKM/s1600-h/sphold.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRyuzFbOIcI/AAAAAAAABc0/UmZ8CduWQKM/s320/sphold.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268277856769548738" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>So how did I trade this? I had some Ultrashort ETFs (SDS, SKF, TWM) that I bought earlier this week in anticipation of a retest of the lows.  They worked well, but when we bounced back above 839 today, it was time to take the gains.  The bounce also provided a clear risk / reward setup on the long side. I played on the side of traders who saw it as a successful retest, and I went long with a combination of the strongest and weakest sectors (some call this a "barbell" strategy).</p>

<p>One of the strongest sectors, in my view, is biotech.  Amgen (AMGN), for example, was up all day and has shown good relative strength over the past couple weeks compared to the overall market.  See the strong chart (AMGN in red, S&P 500 in blue):</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRxz2BSh4RI/AAAAAAAABck/mh-xlMr4V5I/s1600-h/amgn.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRxz2BSh4RI/AAAAAAAABck/mh-xlMr4V5I/s320/amgn.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268213036012921106" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>Just as quality sectors with good relative strength tend to bounce well in a bear market rally (because people want to own them), weak sectors also tend to bounce rather violently (because shorts cover and people want to bottom fish).  Two of the weakest sectors are energy and financials, so I bought the Ultralong ETFs (DIG and UYG).  I don't plan on holding them long because they really are terrible sectors, but I will play the bounce with trailing stops. Here's the weak and ugly chart (S&P 500 in green, DIG blue and UYG red):</p>

<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRyy2m_9erI/AAAAAAAABc8/TgLlPqfTVQc/s1600-h/diguyg.png"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_DUlCBX4F9b4/SRyy2m_9erI/AAAAAAAABc8/TgLlPqfTVQc/s320/diguyg.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5268282315368135346" border="0" /></a></p>

<p>This type of trading is not for everyone.  It requires time to watch the ticks and agility to act quickly.  But right now, the only way to make sense of these big market moves is by understanding the technical context and using it to your advantage to take calculated risks.  Even though I'm playing this rally, make no mistake:  this is still a bear market until proven otherwise, and I will not hesitate to go short again when the risk / reward is in my favor.</p>

<p>Two of <a href="http://www.dacharts.com/articles/_22rulestrading.htm">Dennis Gartman's rules</a> are especially applicable today:</p>

<p><span style="font-weight: bold;font-family:Arial;" >--Trade like a mercenary guerrilla. We must fight on the winning side and be willing to change sides readily when one side has gained the upper hand.</span></p>

<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">--</span><span style="font-weight: bold;font-family:Arial;" >To trade successfully, think like a fundamentalist; trade like a technician.</span></p>

<p>Disclosure:  Long DIG, UYG, AMGN.<br />
See more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/low_and_behold_its_a_bear_mark_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/low_and_behold_its_a_bear_mark_1.php</guid>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">AMGN</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">DIG</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SDS</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SKF</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">TWM</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">UYG</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:28:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Context Check: Technical Picture Mixed, Macro Picture Still Bearish</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><u>THE TECHNICAL PICTURE: MIXED</u></strong></p>

<p>Last Wednesday, I wrote that it was time to <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/11/time-to-grin-and-bear-it.html">Grin And "Bear" It</a> as I expected a downside move after the S&P 500 hit its head on resistance around 1000. With the following chart, I mused about a downside slide to support around 900 (the October 10th closing low) or 839 (the same's intraday low).</p>

<p><img alt="spresist.png" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/spresist.png" width="512" height="288" /></p>

<p>The downside slide took place, with alarming speed. In the worst 2-day move since the 1987 crash, the S&P 500 fell more than 10% and hit support at 900 (899.73, to be exact). I can't take credit for any predictive ability, this rudimentary technical analysis doesn't always work but it provides a context for trading. Buying a short ETF around 1000 and covering around 900 was a sensible bet.</p>

<p>Looking again at the chart, what do we see? We see a possible "reverse head and shoulders" forming (<a href="http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inverseheadandshoulders.asp">click here for the definition from Investopedia</a>). That would be bullish. However, if the "right shoulder" at 900 doesn't hold, we'd likely get a test of the next support level at 840.</p>

<p><img alt="sp900.png" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/sp900.png" width="512" height="288" /></p>

<p>Again, this is context and it's a hard call which way it will go until it happens. Technical analysis paints the lines on the playing field but doesn't play the game. In my view, giving up today's gap up is a bad sign and I'm anticipating a move lower with some of the short ETFs. This is a bear market, so my benefit of the doubt goes with the bears and I'm playing on their team for now. You can play the current context whichever way you prefer as long as you have an exit strategy to protect against big losses.<br />
<u><strong><br />
THE MACRO PICTURE: STILL BEARISH</strong></u></p>

<p>Here's why I still carry a bearish bent:</p>

<p>--<strong>The dollar is still going up while commodities are going down.</strong> This is a deflationary move and is bearish for stocks. I've started a small position in UUP (Bullish Dollar ETF) because I think this will continue. For years the dollar went down compared to many other currencies. As other countries lower interest rates to try to stimulate growth (something the US has already done, almost to zero), their currencies will lose strength.</p>

<p>--<strong>Countries are racing to Zero on interest rates.</strong> On a related note, I recommend the following article from Bloomberg: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=ayE0YPzpdD38&refer=exclusive">Zero Rate World May Lie Ahead as King, Trichet Cut</a>. Usually rate cuts are cheered by markets as easy money increases risk taking. But what happens when it doesn't work? You can give money to institutions, but you can make them lend or spend, especially when they need to deleverage (reduce debt). Are we looking at the Japanese situation worldwide?</p>

<p>--<strong>Unemployment is going higher and earnings are going lower.</strong> The unemployment issue seems obvious to most observers and is obviously bad for the economy. Corporate earnings are also going lower, and analyst estimates are still too high. Therefore, stocks are not as cheap as they seem, because the "E" in P/E is still too high. More downgrades are on the way (though hopefully not as bad as GM today, hit with a price target of zero).</p>

<p>--<strong>The Financial and Real Estate sectors are especially weak.</strong> With all the news about the election and General Motors, financial and real estate stocks have been quietly deteriorating. Goldman Sachs (GS) is acting terribly, and the strongest ticks on my screen are the Ultrashort ETFs of these sectors (SKF and SRS). Is another shoe about to drop, like commercial real estate, insurers, or something we're not even aware of?</p>

<p>--<strong>I had a rough weekend in fantasy football.</strong> This is probably not a good reason to be bearish on the stock market, but life is complex and a bearish mood can have many causes. If Frank Gore has a big game on Monday Night Football, I might be in a more bullish mood tomorrow! </p>

<p>Disclosure:  Long SDS, TWM, SRS, SKF, UUP<br />
Find more at <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/context_check_technical_pictur.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/context_check_technical_pictur.php</guid>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GM</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">GS</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SDS</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SKF</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SRS</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">TWM</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">UUP</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:35:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Friday Video Game Update: Can Gamestop Avoid The Grinch?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It's Friday, and that means time for the Friday Video Game Update.  This week I'll respond to a reader's question.</p>

<p><strong>GAMESTOP:  A GOOD BUY INTO EARNINGS?</strong></p>

<p>A reader left the following comment: </p>

<blockquote>I can't help but think that with ATVI earnings, ERTS earnings (past & future revenue good, profit not), and Ubisoft's (UBI.PA) beat & raise that GME is positioned well to report good earnings and guide in-line. Especially with what they offer the customer in the current economy, trade-in values as well as less expensive used games. Do you own or watch GME?</blockquote>

<p>I do own a small position in Gamestop, and have been wondering what to do with it before they report earnings on November 20th.  Like most stocks, GME has suffered this year.  A troubling sign is that GME has underperformed the retail sector (as represented by the Retail Holders ETF--RTH), but RTH is 20% Wal-mart, so I wouldn't worry about that so much.  (wow, that's an ugly decline!)   </p>

<p><img alt="gme1yrbby.png" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/gme1yrbby.png" width="512" height="299" /></p>

<p>More troubling is that GME has recently underperformed a competitor like Best Buy (BBY), despite (I would argue) better fundamentals, such as stronger revenue growth and lower debt. An especially good fundamental sign to me is that Gamestop was able to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/gamestop-buy-french-game-retailer/story.aspx?guid={DCFAAD1C-DAFA-4F42-ABE5-981D64D826A1}&siteid=yhoof">buy a French game retailer</a>, Micromania, showing off a strong cash position and a strategy for future growth. Part of the underperformance in the stock might be due to the fact that GME has outperformed for so long and it had to do some catching up on the downside (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=GME&t=5y&l=on&z=m&q=l&p=&a=&c=rth,bby">click here for a 5-year chart </a>if you're interested).  Here's the competitor snapshot from Yahoo!</p>

<p><img alt="compete.PNG" src="http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/compete.PNG" width="643" height="520" /></p>

<p>The P/E ratio, PEG ratio, and Price to Sales ratio (P/S) all look decent to me, but the problem recently has been that analyst earnings estimates are still too high across the board.  Whether this is true for GME remains to be seen.  <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/07/activision-electronic-arts-pf-ii-in_jd_1107optionswatch_inl.html?partner=yahootix">Forbes points out </a>that although GME has been beat estimates the past 4 quarters, that could set the stock up for a fall.  </p>

<blockquote>Forbes: Heading into the earnings report, Wall Street is extremely optimistic when it comes to the retailer. Zacks reports that all 12 of the analysts following the firm rate it a "buy" or better, leaving ample room for downgrades should the company post less than stellar results.</blockquote>

<p>I personally think the earnings will be fine, and downgrades don't worry me so much because the stock has been sold off aggressively already (-60% this year).  I'm not sure much can be gleaned from the game publishers' earnings--ATVI, Ubisoft, and Nintendo were fine, but THQI and ERTS were not good at all.  It's the outlook that will really matter.  If guidance is above estimates, the stock could see a pop, but if guidance is cautious, the response will be anyone's guess.  Everyone expects a Grinch-like recession for the holidays, so we need to keep in mind that most retailers are being shunned by the Street. </p>

<p>As for me, I think GME is a good value (depending on your time horizon) in the low to mid 20s.  But then again, I thought that in the low to mid 30s!  GME made a new 52-week low just yesterday at 23.53.  Going forward I'll be looking at how GME (and the overall market) acts leading up to the report.  A big run up would beg traders to "sell the news," while a further sell off would set the stage for a rally.  It's a tough call, which may argue for staying on the sidelines.  I'll probably keep my small position and only trade around it when the risk/reward is particularly appetizing.  For now, that means buying for a trade near 24 and selling near 30.  </p>

<p>Thanks for the comment and look for another Video Game Update next Friday!  If you missed <a href="http://thestocksurfer.blogspot.com/2008/10/friday-video-game-update-buying.html">last week's call to buy Activision</a>, check it out.  </p>

<p>Disclosure: Long GME, ATVI, NTDOY<br />
Simultaneously posted on my personal site, <a href="http://www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com">www.thestocksurfer.blogspot.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/friday_video_game_update_can_g_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://www.investorplaceblogs.com/users/thestocksurfer/2008/11/friday_video_game_update_can_g_1.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:23:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
