Register
Hello, !
Edit Profile | Logout

A rational suggestion - bond insurer ABK

Rating: 2.00 (4 votes)    Vote: Terrible (-3)Worse (-2)Bad (-1)So-so (0)Good (+1)Better (+2)Best (+3)
User name*: '    Password*:
or register if you are a new user
User name*:
First name*:
Last name*:
Password*:
E-mail*:
Retype e-mail*:
Opt-In: Yes, send me email from InvestorPlace Blogs regarding blog post notifications and voting/commenting bulletins, along with The Investor Post weekly e-letter. Please un-check this box if you would prefer not to receive email from us.
Privacy Policy
InvestorPlace Blogs is powered by Marketocracy. Marketocracy has authorized Investor Place Blogs as an official registrar for voting through Marketocracy's Investment Research Rating service. Registered members of InvestorPlace Blogs are linked with a Marketocracy account to establish voting power based on their performance of trading and posting on stocks.

Today Andrew Moloff of Evercore Asset Management published a copy of a letter to Ambac's (ABK) board, in which he suggested strongly that they give up on their capital plan and let the company go into runoff.

His reasoning, which is impeccable, is that the company is worth far more to the shareholders that way than if they give it away by raising equity capital. Because Adjusted Book Value, which was over 80 a share as of the end of the last quarter, is radically higher than the current market price, as low as 4.50 today, the shareholders stand to realize far more in a runoff than if the company raises expensive equity capital.

After doing the math on hypothetical equity offerings at 6 a share, I think management would be well-advised to decline to raise capital under today's prohibitive conditions. Assuming S&P's stress case loss estimates, adjusted upward due to their recent change to 19% cumulative losses on 2006 Sub-prime, are an accurate estimate, I see in excess of 40 per share salvage to the shareholders.

On the other hand, If over 1 billion of capital is raised by issuing equity, the share value would be more like 19 a share after accounting for losses, and assuming valuations return to normal.

I own ABK in my personal portfolio and I will be writing to the board, making the same suggestion. Perhaps it is time for Ambac to take their ball and go home. That seems better than giving in to the insanity of the marketplace.

Tom

Comments (1)

gullapalli:

Tom, Looks like you put a high probability on the survival of these insurance companies. Do they have the money to pay off all the phony mortgages (subprime!)turned into CMOs by Merrill and Lehmans. May be you can explain the underpinnings of your hope for ABK ..

Post a comment

You are logged in as . Log out


Comment Preview
Preview your comment here

You must be logged in to comment. Click here to register.